similar to: [LLVMdev] make llvm-ld to link 64-bits libs???

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] make llvm-ld to link 64-bits libs???"

2005 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] gccld not passing -export-dynamic to gcc for link
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:13:15PM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote: > The attached patch fixes this. ...but had tabs in it. Misha kindly reminded me off-list that this was bad. Try this one instead. -- Nicholas Riley <njriley at uiuc.edu> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley> -------------- next part -------------- Index: tools/gccld/GenerateCode.cpp
2005 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] gccld not passing -export-dynamic to gcc for link
gccld passes -shared through if it's generating a shared library, but if you're compiling a program that needs to have its symbols externally accessible, it doesn't pass -export-dynamic through to gcc for the final link. The attached patch fixes this. I've tested with a small test case I sent Chris, and with Python; both seem to work. I also fixed some inaccurate comments in
2003 May 22
1
[LLVMdev] allow gcc .... /full/path/to/libfoo.a
gccld would barf if you tried to specify the full pathname of an archive on the command line to gcc, (e.g., instead of gcc ... -L/full/path/to -lFOO you say gcc ... /full/path/to/libFOO.a) which many GNU Makefiles try to do. This patch fixes that. Ok to commit? -- gaeke at uiuc.edu gccld.cpp: Fix typo in header. Add IsArchive static method. Roll LoadLibraryFromDirectory() into
2009 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] Something wrong with my libpthread.so
Hi,all I tried to run the generated whole-program bitcode of BIND,but I got some information: 0 lli 0x0000000000feda16 1 lli 0x0000000000fed88f 2 libpthread.so.0 0x0000003df340eee0 3 libc.so.6 0x0000003df28332f5 gsignal + 53 4 libc.so.6 0x0000003df2834b20 abort + 384 5 libc.so.6 0x0000003df282c2fa __assert_fail + 234 6 lli
2006 Mar 05
1
[LLVMdev] Possible solution to a llvm-ld bug
Hello, As previously mentioned I had a linking problem using llvm-ld (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-February/005246.html) I was getting a error if I used -L switch when linking using the following command line: llvm-ld -o t1.app t1.bc t1.a -L/opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib -lcrtend I believe I've tracked down the problem; in the "main" of tools/llvm-ld.cpp the
2009 Oct 31
1
[LLVMdev] I have built a whole-program bitcode file foropenldap-2.19
I'm not completely sure but something like the build system will still call the native linker when it meets a LLVM object file which causes an error. I once tried to modify the codes of gold-plugin, but the trouble is still there,I think we should hack collect2 of llvm-gcc to make it invoke llvm-ld automatically when it receive the -emit-llvm option(I once tried this, but I found that even
2006 Jun 08
2
install.packages() does not warn when 'lib' arg is missing on Linux or Windows
Hello, Man page for 'install.packages' says that if the 'lib' arg is missing, then it "defaults to '.libPaths()[1]' with a warning". But, given the 'install.packages' source code, it seems that this warning is issued only when 'length(.libPaths()) > 1'. So typically, this warning will appear on Mac OS X but not on a Linux or Windows systems
2009 Sep 11
2
No 64 bit binary for Fax for Asterisk
Hi, Last night I was working on trying to get Fax for Asterisk installed. I followed all the instructions, but noted that the download selector only provider an X86 32 Bit binary. The machine I'm using is: 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 13 17:46:45 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux Consequently, on load it presents an error: [Sep 12 10:25:35] WARNING[31306]: loader.c:368 load_dynamic_module:
2018 Jul 24
0
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
On 07/24/2018 07:50 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Benjamin Tyner >>>>>> on Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:43 -0400 writes: > > Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: > > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html > > > but in any case perhaps the problem could partially be remedied on
2018 Jul 25
1
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
On 24.07.2018 23:37, Benjamin Tyner wrote: > > > On 07/24/2018 07:50 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>> Benjamin Tyner >>>>>>> ???? on Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:43 -0400 writes: >> ???? > Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: >> ???? > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html >>
2013 Dec 01
0
[PATCH v2 4/4] efi: PE file size differ from in-memory size
PE headers code_sz and image_sz indicate more or less, the size of the file and the size of the in-memory image. They are now given the right value. In the ELF format, only the program headers are reliable to determine the actually needed part of the file and the in-memory size. The .bss section should always be marked as NOLOAD for ld since its content shouldn't be included into the binary
2008 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] llvm-ld EmitShellScript and -L
Hi, I wanted to load /usr/lib64/libreadline.so into lli (aka "link against it" in llvm-ld). Impossible with llvm-ld, because it uses sys::Path::FindLibrary() which only checks the system lib paths, so it always picked up /usr/lib/libreadline.so. Even copying it into ./mylib, and specifying -L mylib doesn't work - again because sys::Path::FindLibrary() doesn't know about
2013 Nov 27
0
[PATCH 4/4] efi: PE file size differ from in-memory size
PE headers code_sz and image_sz indicate more or less, the size of the file and the size of the in-memory image. They are now given the right value. In the ELF format, only the program headers are reliable to determine the actually needed part of the file and the in-memory size. The .bss section should always be marked as NOLOAD for ld since its content shouldn't be included into the binary
2018 Jul 21
0
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html but in any case perhaps the problem could partially be remedied on line 245 of src/library/base/R/library.R by passing the lib.loc to .getRequiredPackages2() ...here is a patch (untested) Index: src/library/base/R/library.R
2018 Jul 21
3
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
>>>>> Benjamin Tyner >>>>> on Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:42:09 -0400 writes: > Here's a trick/workaround; if lib.loc is the path to your > library, then prior to calling library(), >> environment(.libPaths)$.lib.loc <- lib.loc Well, that is quite a "trick" -- and potentially a pretty dangerous one, not intended when making
2018 Jul 24
4
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
>>>>> Benjamin Tyner >>>>> on Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:43 -0400 writes: > Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html > but in any case perhaps the problem could partially be remedied on line > 245 of src/library/base/R/library.R by passing the lib.loc to
2012 Jun 17
3
[LLVMdev] BlockAddress instruction is copied instead of cloned during module link?
I have a module having the blockaddress instruction. When I link it into another module and delete the original, blockaddress disappears and is replaced by inttoptr (i32 1 to i8*). Please compile and run the attached program to see the demo of this problem. Right after linking modules, blockaddress still exists: @switch.bbs = internal global [3 x i8*] [i8* blockaddress(@my_func,
2008 Jul 02
3
could not import module ELFCLASS32
Sorry if this is the wrong list, but doing a code checkout via Mercurial produces the following: #hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.2-testing.hg destination directory: xen-3.2-testing.hg requesting all changes adding changesets abort: could not import module ELFCLASS32! transaction abort! rollback completed Is there a workaround for this right now? -- Joe Auty NetMusician: web
2010 Oct 19
1
[R 2.12] install.packages() with no lib argument does not work
Dear R users, I have just upgraded R from 2.11 to 2.12 on Ubuntu 9.04 (see more informations at the end) from the cran apt-get repository. One of the new things concerning the install.packages() function is stated here : install.packages() and remove.packages() with lib unspecified and multiple libraries in .libPaths() inform the user of the library location used with a message
2024 May 10
0
Heads-up: r2u installs (only) to /usr/lib/R/site-library.
I started using r2u (see https://eddelbuettel.github.io/r2u) recently and thought I was having a problem in that I was getting out-of-date versions of packages. I made enquiries of Dirk Eddelbuettel about this, and he enlightened me as to what the problem really was. I was seeing old versions of packages that were stored in a library, different from /usr/lib/R/site-library. I have a personal