similar to: [LLVMdev] Next Austin Users' Group meeting

12:00 PM at Bombay Bistro, 183 at Braker next to HEB.

I'm taking Talin's idea and running with it with respect to the Austin area. If you're into LLVM and within easy-enough driving distance to make it worthwhile to get together every month or so in Austin, please post here. If there's enough interest, I'll set something up at a local restaurant or someplace like that.

I'm still planning to meet this Friday at Bombay Bistro (183 & Braker, next to HEB).

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm taking Talin's idea and running with it with respect to the Austin > area.  If you're into LLVM and within easy-enough driving distance to > make it worthwhile to get together every month or so in Austin, please > post here.  If there's enough interest, I'll set something

Snow is expected around lunchtime. Let's stay safe and I'll see y'all in January.

Hi Jean-Daniel On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org>wrote: > > Le 19 oct. 2009 à 15:05, Kenneth Uildriks a écrit : > FWIW, there is a LLVM bar camp planed in Paris the next month: > > http://barcamp.org/LLVM%20BarCamp%20Paris (French web page) > > > -- Jean-Daniel > Could you please tell me if it will be in French or

In response to our poll and Chris' efforts in finding available space, we will be meeting at the Apple Campus in Cupertino, CA on Friday, August 1, 2008. We are tentatively going to start at 8:00 AM and end at 5:00 PM. The agenda for the day is still being planned. If you're interested in speaking, please email me off-list with details about the subject you would like to

Le 19 oct. 2009 à 15:05, Kenneth Uildriks a écrit : > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: >> >> On Oct 18, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Talin wrote: >> >>> So I wasn't able to attend the developer meeting this year, even >>> though >>> I had signed up for it. This was a big disappointment to me,

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it > required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings.  I > hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk. > LLVMGetAttribute had a bug in it. Here's the revised version of the patch

Le 20 oct. 2009 à 10:27, Artur Pietrek a écrit : > Hi Jean-Daniel > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org > > wrote: > > Le 19 oct. 2009 à 15:05, Kenneth Uildriks a écrit : > FWIW, there is a LLVM bar camp planed in Paris the next month: > > http://barcamp.org/LLVM%20BarCamp%20Paris (French web page) > > > --

My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings. I hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the trunk. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cbindings.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 7269 bytes Desc: not available URL:

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Kenneth Uildriks<kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > It would be unfortunate in a way if "this instruction can trap and go > there" is taken to mean "if this instruction has no effect other than > a possible trap, the instruction and the trapping behavior *must* be > preserved". What exactly would the semantics be if the

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Evan Shaw <chickencha at gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm writing a frontend with the LLVM C bindings for a language that >> has a goto statement, similar to C's. I'm having some trouble figuring >> out what to do for the case where the label is

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Talin wrote: > >> So I wasn't able to attend the developer meeting this year, even >> though >> I had signed up for it. This was a big disappointment to me, >> particularly because I had hoped to get some hands-on assistance for >> some

Hi, For those who are interested I will be presenting at the Austin Linux Users Group meeting tonight. Topic: What's holding Linux back? When will grandma be ready for Linux? More info: http://www.austinlug.org/ I'll be happy to answer Samba questions at or after the meeting. Cheers, John T.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Evan Shaw <chickencha at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Evan Shaw <chickencha at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm writing a frontend with the LLVM C bindings for a language that >>> has a goto statement, similar to

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Kenneth Uildriks<kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Eli Friedman<eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Kenneth Uildriks<kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: >>> It would be unfortunate in a way if "this instruction can trap and go >>> there" is taken to

On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kenneth Uildriks > <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: >> My front-end is sync'd with the trunk now, and working well, but it >> required some additional functions exposed in the C bindings. I >> hereby submit them for review and approval for inclusion in the >> trunk.

The Austin Asterisk User Group is meeting next Monday. See aaug.bybent.com for more information on the location. Topic and date aren't correct on the page, but the location and time are. -- Chris Tooley 512-646-1507 ctooley@gnumber.com

Looks like I''ll be in Austin from Tuesday (late) night until Saturday morning. Any Puppeteers in Austin who want to get together? I''ve got vague plans to hang out with whurley, but I''d love to meet a few more people in the community. Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday night should work fine (although not all three). -- Always behave like a duck - keep calm and