similar to: [LLVMdev] Problem in InlineCost.h

I'm having trouble debugging x86 code generated by LLVM. GDB does work with the code, but not correctly, for example, the "next" command does not skip over a function call. Here's an example. Source program gdb1.c: int x; void foo(){ x++; } void bar(){ x--; } int main(){ foo(); bar(); return 0; } commands: $ llvm-gcc -g -emit-llvm -c gdb1.c -o gdb1.bc $ llc

Thanks for the suggestions. It looks like Duncan's suggestion got me a step closer, but I still can't build llvm-gcc... On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Christian Sayer <Christian.Sayer at dibcom.fr> wrote: > did you try a simple > > $ ../llvm-2.5/configure --prefix=/pkg/bin/llvm/ > CC=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/gcc CXX=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/g++ Tried that, same error.

Hi, After r256521 - which removes InlineCostAnalysis class - I think there is no strong reason for InlineCost.cpp to be part of the Analysis library. Is it fine to make it part of TransformUtils? I submitted r266477 (which has now been reverted) that made Analysis depend on ProfileData in order to obtain ProfileSummary for the module, but there is an existing dependency of ProfileData on

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com> > To: "Xinliang David Li" <davidxl at google.com> > Cc: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com>, "Hal Finkel" > <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 4:31:05 PM

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The difference between Analysis and Transforms is *not* about passes, but >> about what

> On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Easwaran Raman" <eraman at google.com> >> To: "via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com>, "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com>, "via llvm-dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Xinliang David Li" <davidxl at google.com> > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 4:54:36 PM

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > The difference between Analysis and Transforms is *not* about passes, but > about what the code *does*. > > Code for mutating the IR should be in Transforms, and code that analyzes > the IR without mutating it should be in Analysis. This is why, for example, > InstructionSimplify is in

Hi, > Ok, I 'synchronized' both of them, but now I am getting a different > error. On running make, the output ends with the following error: please don't only reply to me, please reply to the list too. That way others can comment, and the discussion is archived. > cc1: /home/gautam/code/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/InlineCost.h:44: >

Hi, I just took this test on Tickle.com. What''s Your Fame and Fortune? http://web.tickle.com/invite?test=1177&type=t Take it and see how you score. You can see my score at the end. Surekha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060612/8fc88913/attachment.html

While attempting to compile llvm-gcc on Intel x86_64 2-way 4-core machine, i got the following errors: configure line i used is: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/configure --enable-llvm=`pwd`/../../llvm-2.5 --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-languages=c,c++ --host=x86_64-redhat-linux --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-multilib --disable-shared Errors: lvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/gcc/.

Hi all We did some failover/failback tests on 2 nodes��A and B�� with architecture 'glusterfs + ctdb(public address) + nfs-ganesha'�� 1st: During write, unplug the network cable of serving node A ->NFS Client took a few seconds to recover to conitinue writing. After some minutes, plug the network cable of serving node A ->NFS Client also took a few seconds to recover

On 8/7/2017 1:02 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > Can someone fill me in on the issue with the dominator tree, > precisely, during inlining? > We now have the capability of quickly keeping it up to date without > too much trouble (it may require pushing it through a bunch of places, > but the actual changes to do should be easy). If I'm not mistaken (which I very well could be

Martin Schwenke schrieb am 15.02.2023 23:23: > Hi Uli, > > [Sorry for slow response, life is busy...] Thanks for answering anyway! > On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:06:26 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller via samba > OK, this part looks kind-of good. It would be interesting to know how > long the entire failover process is taking. What exactly would you define as the begin and end of the

Hi, > cc1: /pkg/build/llvm/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/InlineCost.h:44: > llvm::InlineCost::InlineCost(int, int): Assertion `Cost == C && "Cost > exceeds InlineCost precision"' failed. > ../../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/gcc/libgcov.c:644: internal compiler error: Aborted this is indeed a miscompilation by your system compiler. However so many compilers

I am still having problems getting everything installed. I realized that the successful build of llvm-2.5 had in fact been configured to use the system gcc (4.1.2). However, I was unable to sucessfully build llvm-gcc with gcc 4.1.2. I went back and attempted to build llvm-2.5 with gcc-4.2.4 (installed in a separate directory from system gcc). However, I got the same build error as before. Then I

On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:30:37 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller <ulrich.sibiller at atos.net> wrote: > Martin Schwenke schrieb am 15.02.2023 23:23: > > OK, this part looks kind-of good. It would be interesting to know how > > long the entire failover process is taking. > > What exactly would you define as the begin and end of the failover? From "Takeover run

When I attempt to follow any tutorial for llvm and add the `llvm-config --cxxflags --ldflags --libs all` line to my GXX_FLAGS, g++ chokes on llvm/GlobalValue.h, complaining of an invalid cast from int to llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes. I receive this error under both Red Hat and Ubuntu and the version of G++ I am using is 4.1.2. Thanks in advance, Jared -------------- next part -------------- An

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Xinliang David Li" <davidxl at google.com> > To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "via llvm-dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 5:45:21 PM

On 04/18/2016 04:05 PM, Easwaran Raman via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com > <mailto:chandlerc at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:20 PM Easwaran Raman <eraman at google.com > <mailto:eraman at google.com>> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:00 PM,