similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] docs/Bugpoint.html: mention -debug-pass=Arguments

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@iki.fi> wrote: > ıuoʎ <yonjah@gmail.com> writes: >> I have a host running a few guests all configured to autostart. >> I'm also using libvirt-guests to suspend the guests when the host >> restarts or shuts down > > I have a similar setup. I solved it by writing a small daemon that syncs

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors > <timo.lindfors at iki.fi> wrote: >> Tianwei <tianwei.sheng at gmail.com> writes: >>> someone suggested me to use gold-plugin, I know nothing about it yet, I will >>> have a try later. Does anyone have a good solution for this problem? >> Afaik gold does not help here. I

* Timo Juhani Lindfors (timo.lindfors at iki.fi) wrote: > Hi, > > Alexandre Gouraud <alexandre.gouraud at enst-bretagne.fr> writes: > > if it does not already exists, could it mean it is a nonsense, then why? > > Why don't you compile your program directly to LLVM bitcode? - In security-testing you sometimes apply black boxing. I've had a similar idea

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors at iki.fi> wrote: > Tianwei <tianwei.sheng at gmail.com> writes: >> someone suggested me to use gold-plugin, I know nothing about it yet, I will >> have a try later.  Does anyone have a good solution for this problem? > > Afaik gold does not help here. I tried it and managed to only generate >

Hi, attached patch fixes an obvious typo in docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html. best regards, Timo Lindfors -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-docs-writing-pass-typo1.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 407 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091012/27de943d/attachment.patch>

Hi Timo, Thanks for commenting. I feel like I have to justify why I don't want to use QEMU, which is fine since my choice is not frozen actually. QEMU is much more than what I need for dynamically instrumenting software. My goal is automated testing to find bugs, which can quickly be intensive in term of computational load. Thus I am trying to get the smallest (and fastest) tool. Even using

--emit-llvm?? On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com>wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this > one as well. > Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one? > > Viktor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nick Lewycky" <nicholas at

Hi, what's the current state of being able to build simple analysis passes out-of-tree against only llvm headers and libraries with llvm-config? I see that clang and klee do not use llvm-config but for example rubinius does. Should both approaches be documented? Currently for example docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html says "you need to create a new directory somewhere in the LLVM source

Hello everyone, I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this one as well. Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one? Viktor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Lewycky" <nicholas at mxc.ca> To: "Daniel Dunbar" <daniel at zuster.org> Cc: "Kelly, Terence P (HP Labs Researcher)" <terence.p.kelly at

--emit-llvm, if not conflict >>> Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> 10/30/2009 11:11 AM >>> --emit-llvm?? On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com> wrote: Hello everyone, I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this one as well. Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one? Viktor

Hi, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: > Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/Format.h"? Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. Btw, llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp seems to also use fprintf -- does mixing it with errs() cause problems and should it be converted to use format()? best regards, Timo Lindfors

Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Nick Lewycky<nicholas at mxc.ca> writes: >> The interpreter uses libffi to make external function calls. However, it >> needs to be detected at LLVM's compile time. If you're using the >> released packages, we disabled that because we were worried about users >> who don't have libffi installed. > > This seems to be

Hi Nick: Thanks for pointing me to libffi. Recompile LLVM with libffi does solve the problem of printf. But it still has other problems: 1) sinf() returns 0 in the interpreter, but returns correct value in JIT (see hellosin.c) 2) calling pthread_create cause lli to crash in the interpreter mode, but no problem in JIT (see phello.c). My questions are: i) can I call any arbitrary external function

Tianwei <tianwei.sheng at gmail.com> writes: > someone suggested me to use gold-plugin, I know nothing about it yet, I will > have a try later. Does anyone have a good solution for this problem? Afaik gold does not help here. I tried it and managed to only generate native code. I'm currently investigating an alternative approach to produce whole-program bitcodes: 1) add

Thank you for this information. If so, is there any way to grasp which kinda data throw in and out in LLVM as shown in such a way in gdb? Thanks, Seung Jae Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:54:04 -0600 >From: "John T. Criswell" <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] bugpoint usage >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at

Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> writes: > The interpreter uses libffi to make external function calls. However, it > needs to be detected at LLVM's compile time. If you're using the > released packages, we disabled that because we were worried about users > who don't have libffi installed. This seems to be quite a common problem (I too hit it once, thought it

Hi Nick: The first problem have been solved by calling llvm-ld: $ llvm-ld -o hellosin.llvm hellosin.bc -lm $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/usr/lib/libm.so hellosin.llvm.bc hello sin: 0.50 The pthread problem remains after llvm-ld: $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/lib/libpthread.so.0 phello.llvm.bc 0 lli 0x08796bf8 Segmentation fault For those who are getting "invalid

Hi, LLI now supports -load but bugpoint LLI:ExecuteProgram() still assumes that it doesn't. The attached patch makes bugpoint pass -load arguments to LLI and lets one to use bugpoint with programs that depend on native shared libraries. best regargs, Timo Lindfors -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-bugpoint-load1.patch Type: text/x-diff

Hello. Can I use debugging options such as 'step', 'next'(in gdb) also in LLVM bugpoint? Thank you.

Xu Yang wrote: > Hi Nick: > > The first problem have been solved by calling llvm-ld: > > $ llvm-ld -o hellosin.llvm hellosin.bc -lm > $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/usr/lib/libm.so hellosin.llvm.bc > hello sin: 0.50 Only because the optimizer saw sin(constant) and folded it away. The entire program became 'print constant string'. There is certainly a bug