similar to: [LLVMdev] [2.6] attention llvm users

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [2.6] attention llvm users"

2009 Mar 03
0
LLVM 2.5 Release!
Hi Everyone, LLVM 2.5 is live: you can download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ and read about it here: http://llvm.org/releases/2.5/docs/ReleaseNotes.html LLVM 2.5 includes an amazing collection of bug fixes, performance improvements (both in the compiler itself and in the generated code) and new features. Some highlights include a new XCore backend, significantly improved llvm-gcc
2009 Oct 24
0
LLVM 2.6 Release!
Hi LLVM Friends, Fans, Followers and Fanatics, LLVM 2.6 is live! You can download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ and read about it here: http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/ReleaseNotes.html This release includes approximately 6 months of development that provide major enhancements and new features over the LLVM 2.5 release. This includes significantly better X86-64 code generation,
2012 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] [3.1 Release] Release Notes and External Projects
On 11.05.2012, at 22:55, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all! > > Please remember to update the release notes! We're getting close to the release date, and we need the notes to be up-to-date. I added some bigger picture notes to http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html this morning, but we're still missing a lot of text, specifically: - clang: clang has it's own release notes
2010 Apr 22
8
[LLVMdev] 2.7 release notes
Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit improvements if you have commit access): http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Things still needed are marked with FIXMEs. These include: 1. Clang needs a blurb describing what's new in 2.7. Have the clang folks been doing anything for the last 6 months? 2. I
2012 Dec 14
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.2 release notes + LLVM Users
The LLVM 3.2 release is winding down, and that means release notes! There are two pieces to this. First, if you're an external LLVM user, we'd like to list you as such in the release notes. This is a great way to get some free advertisement. The section is here: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_32/docs/ReleaseNotes.html?revision=HEAD#externalproj Please email
2011 Mar 10
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 release notes + "Projects using LLVM" + API changes
Hi All, With 2.9 starting to make its way out into the world, it is time to start poking at the release notes. I plan to make a pass through llvm-commits to cull some of the major changes into bullets, but am already behind and insanely busy with other stuff over the next week. If you have commit access, I'd really appreciate it if you could take a pass through llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
2010 Sep 29
0
[LLVMdev] projects that work with llvm 2.8
Hi All, I'm preparing the release notes for LLVM 2.8 and would appreciate it if you could send me a blurb if you maintain an out-of-tree project that works with it. The list from 2.7 was here: http://llvm.org/releases/2.7/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#externalproj I need your input by saturday night (Oct 2). No projects listed in 2.7 will be carried forward unless you send me an update. Thanks
2010 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] projects that work with llvm 2.8
Dear Chris, Project Name: Kai Project Website: http://www.oriontransfer.co.nz/research/kai Project Description: Kai (Japanese 会 for meeting/gathering) is an experimental interpreter that provides a highly extensible runtime environment and explicit control over the compilation process. Programs are defined using nested symbolic expressions, which are all parsed into first-class values with
2011 Nov 27
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0 release notes
The first draft of the LLVM 3.0 release notes now done, in llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html (the web page isn't autoupdating at the moment). Please take a look and make corrections or enhancements as you see fit. There are still a few things that I need from specific people (marked with XXX's): - BillW is writing a blog about exception handling. - The llvm.expect intrinsic isn't documented
2011 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] [3.0 Release] Call for External Open Source Projects Using LLVM 3.0
Another one: Name: SDC - The Stupid D Compiler (https://github.com/bhelyer/SDC) Description: A project seeking to write a self-hosting compiler for the D programming language, without using the frontend of the reference compiler (DMD). Regards, Alex On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Good day! > > To get ready for the release, we need
2013 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] Call For Projects Using LLVM
Hey! Do you have a project that uses LLVM in a significant way? I.e., it uses the LLVM / Clang libraries as an integral part of its processing, not just that it’s compiled by clang. If so, please send a short blurb so that we can place it into the ReleaseNotes file. You don’t have to spam the mailing list. Just send it directly to me and I can add it for you. :-) Share and enjoy! -bw P.S. Even
2005 Aug 28
0
All extensions now cannot loggin!!!!
2009 Oct 11
2
[LLVMdev] 2.6 release notes
The PIC16 is an 8-bit target but under the "LLVM IR and Core Improvements"heading it's called a 16-bit target. --John > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:14:21 -0700 > Subject: [LLVMdev] 2.6 release notes > Hi
2011 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] [3.0 Release] Call for External Open Source Projects Using LLVM 3.0
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Good day! > > To get ready for the release, we need to make sure that the list of external open source projects using LLVM 3.0 (file:///Volumes/Sandbox/llvm/llvm.src/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#externalproj) is up to date. Please send me an email with the project's name and a short description of it.
2011 Apr 06
0
[LLVMdev] Last call for "external users of llvm" in the 2.9 release notes
Hi All, If you have an out of tree project that works with the 2.9 release, and would like to be mentioned here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#externalproj please send me a blurb ASAP. -Chris
2011 Oct 25
9
[LLVMdev] [3.0 Release] Call for External Open Source Projects Using LLVM 3.0
Good day! To get ready for the release, we need to make sure that the list of external open source projects using LLVM 3.0 (file:///Volumes/Sandbox/llvm/llvm.src/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#externalproj) is up to date. Please send me an email with the project's name and a short description of it. Alternatively, if the project was commented out and you would still like to be listed, just tell me
2011 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0 release notes
Internal API changes mentioned the Type system changes twice... merging. It should now read: The biggest and most pervasive change is that the type system has been rewritten: PATypeHolder and OpaqueType are gone, and all APIs deal with Type* instead of const Type*. If you need to create recursive structures, then create a named structure, and use setBody() when all its elements are built. Type
2013 Dec 03
1
[LLVMdev] Please update LDC references on LLVM website
On 03.12.2013 14:30, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Can you send a patch? Hi Rafael, the patch is attached. @Mikael, Tim Thanks for the help. I really needed only the link to the repo. Regards, Kai > > On 2 December 2013 06:44, Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I like to submit some updates to the LLVM website regarding the LDC >> compiler. All
2009 Oct 10
3
[LLVMdev] 2.6 release notes
Hi All, I'm done with the first pass over the 2.6 release notes, see them here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes-2.6.html Please feel free to directly edit the file or send improvements. We aim to release 2.6 tomorrow or early next week. -Chris
2008 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] ldc (LLVM backend for the D Programming Language) has x86-64 support
On Oct 27, 2008, at 11:03 PM, Kelly W wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I just thought I would let people here know that ldc (llvm backend > for the D Programming Language) is getting pretty usable (a few > larger libraries compile) and it now has x86-64 support added. I > decided to run some timings on some D and C++ code to compare ldc to > dmd (the mainline compiler),