similar to: [LLVMdev] converting x86 instructions to LLVM instructions

Hi Timo, Thanks for commenting. I feel like I have to justify why I don't want to use QEMU, which is fine since my choice is not frozen actually. QEMU is much more than what I need for dynamically instrumenting software. My goal is automated testing to find bugs, which can quickly be intensive in term of computational load. Thus I am trying to get the smallest (and fastest) tool. Even using

Alexandre Gouraud <alexandre.gouraud at enst-bretagne.fr> writes: > like to write the same kind of thing, but not using QEMU as they claim in > the paper, but rather with my own pin tool. You could also use valgrind to convert x86 to valgrind's IR and then write a tool to convert that IR to LLVM.

Dear all, I am studying a paper (cf below) that says they have written a piece of code to translate x86 instructions to LLVM. I am interested in this, and would like to write the same kind of thing, but not using QEMU as they claim in the paper, but rather with my own pin tool. >From what I have red until now on LLVM, and my relative poor knowledge of assembly, I have the feeling that this is

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 14:21, Alexandre Gouraud <alexandre.gouraud at enst-bretagne.fr> wrote: > Hi Timo, > > Thanks for commenting. I feel like I have to justify why I don't want to use > QEMU, which is fine since my choice is not frozen actually. > > QEMU is much more than what I need for dynamically instrumenting software. > My goal is automated testing to find

Hi Alexandre, On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Alexandre Gouraud <alexandre.gouraud at enst-bretagne.fr> wrote: > I am studying a paper (cf below) that says they have written a piece of code > to translate x86 instructions to LLVM. I am interested in this, and would > like to write the same kind of thing, but not using QEMU as they claim in > the paper, but rather with my own

> > > Are there particular reasons why you want to translate to LLVM IR? > (E.g. the authors of the paper wanted to be able to use KLEE with > machine code) > > Hi Tilmann I want to do the same. Using KLEE with machine code. With such a framework, I could try to do the same that what is explained here :

Hi, what's the current state of being able to build simple analysis passes out-of-tree against only llvm headers and libraries with llvm-config? I see that clang and klee do not use llvm-config but for example rubinius does. Should both approaches be documented? Currently for example docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html says "you need to create a new directory somewhere in the LLVM source

Hi, when reporting http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5104 I spent quite a while trying to figure out what passes are used by "-O1" so that I could give this list to bugpoint. It turns out -debug-pass=Arguments is mentioned in docs/HowToSubmitABug.html but under a chapter titled "Compile-time optimization bugs" which I naively ignored since my bug was not a compile-time

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@iki.fi> wrote: > ıuoʎ <yonjah@gmail.com> writes: >> I have a host running a few guests all configured to autostart. >> I'm also using libvirt-guests to suspend the guests when the host >> restarts or shuts down > > I have a similar setup. I solved it by writing a small daemon that syncs

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors at iki.fi> wrote: > Tianwei <tianwei.sheng at gmail.com> writes: >> someone suggested me to use gold-plugin, I know nothing about it yet, I will >> have a try later.  Does anyone have a good solution for this problem? > > Afaik gold does not help here. I tried it and managed to only generate >

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors > <timo.lindfors at iki.fi> wrote: >> Tianwei <tianwei.sheng at gmail.com> writes: >>> someone suggested me to use gold-plugin, I know nothing about it yet, I will >>> have a try later. Does anyone have a good solution for this problem? >> Afaik gold does not help here. I

--emit-llvm?? On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com>wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this > one as well. > Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one? > > Viktor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nick Lewycky" <nicholas at

Hello everyone, I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this one as well. Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one? Viktor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Lewycky" <nicholas at mxc.ca> To: "Daniel Dunbar" <daniel at zuster.org> Cc: "Kelly, Terence P (HP Labs Researcher)" <terence.p.kelly at

--emit-llvm, if not conflict >>> Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> 10/30/2009 11:11 AM >>> --emit-llvm?? On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com> wrote: Hello everyone, I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this one as well. Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one? Viktor

Is there a way to make a shading interpolation on an image plot? Something similar to matlab 'shading interp', I think it is called Gouraud shading. What I want is to make a image plot look nicer. with image() it looks very facetted, and I would like to make it look smoother. I've tried with interp.surface() in fields package but it (obviously) makes nan values at the borders and

Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Nick Lewycky<nicholas at mxc.ca> writes: >> The interpreter uses libffi to make external function calls. However, it >> needs to be detected at LLVM's compile time. If you're using the >> released packages, we disabled that because we were worried about users >> who don't have libffi installed. > > This seems to be

Hi, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: > Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/Format.h"? Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. Btw, llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp seems to also use fprintf -- does mixing it with errs() cause problems and should it be converted to use format()? best regards, Timo Lindfors

Hi, attached patch fixes an obvious typo in docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html. best regards, Timo Lindfors -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-docs-writing-pass-typo1.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 407 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091012/27de943d/attachment.patch>

Hi Nick: Thanks for pointing me to libffi. Recompile LLVM with libffi does solve the problem of printf. But it still has other problems: 1) sinf() returns 0 in the interpreter, but returns correct value in JIT (see hellosin.c) 2) calling pthread_create cause lli to crash in the interpreter mode, but no problem in JIT (see phello.c). My questions are: i) can I call any arbitrary external function

Tianwei <tianwei.sheng at gmail.com> writes: > someone suggested me to use gold-plugin, I know nothing about it yet, I will > have a try later. Does anyone have a good solution for this problem? Afaik gold does not help here. I tried it and managed to only generate native code. I'm currently investigating an alternative approach to produce whole-program bitcodes: 1) add