similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-db status

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-db status"

2009 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-db status
I found that llvm-db is the front end for lib/Debugger. I would like to ask you if there is anyone who is actively working on this problem, and if you any specific directions/goals/wish list ~Ioannis On Sep 27, 6:41 pm, Chris Lattner <clatt... at apple.com> wrote: > On Sep 27, 2009, at 3:34 PM, idoud wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I would like to ask what is the
2009 Sep 28
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-db status
No one is working on it or even thinking about it. It is so far from being useful that it should probably just be removed. -Chris On Sep 27, 2009, at 4:29 PM, idoud <doudalis at gmail.com> wrote: > I found that llvm-db is the front end for lib/Debugger. > > I would like to ask you if there is anyone who is actively working on > this problem, > and if you any specific
2009 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-db status
On Sep 27, 2009, at 3:34 PM, idoud wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to ask what is the status concerning llvm-db. When I am > trying to use it I get the following error: > "Error: No supported binding to inferior processes (debugger not > implemented)." > > Searching in the mailing list I found that you have discontinued > working on it. > > I would like to
2009 Sep 12
3
Inquiry:Migration from Linux 7.2 to CentOS 5
Dear All Can you please do me favor and let me know what are the highlights of major benefits of CentOS Release 5 (Final) over the RedHat Linux 7.2 (Enigma) as we are going to migrate to it ? Thank you in advance Regards H.Motamedi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2008 Jul 01
4
[LLVMdev] llvm/tools/lto* rename heads up
Devang removed the old llvm/tools/lto directory and renamed lto2 -> lto. The end result of this is that 'svn up' may complain. If you get an error about this from svn, just do: $ rm -rf llvm/tools/lto* $ svn up llvm/tools to fix it, -Chris
2016 Mar 29
1
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hi Dimitry, this definitely worked. I am passed by the linking errors regarding libc++ or similar. My build stopped now at 95% while linking a clang extra, I am not pretty sure which because i do not have my laptop, possible the clang-rename, if such exists. No undefined references here, however, my hdd's free space run out, so this might be the cause. I have to move or expand now, alas!! The
2016 Mar 28
0
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hi Ioannis, Just delete the projects/libcxx directory, then rebuild from scratch. You should only need to checkout llvm (in the top level directory) and cfe (into the tools/clang subdirectory). -Dimitry > On 29 Mar 2016, at 00:08, Ioannis Koukoulis <i.g.koukoulis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Dimitry, > > I do not particularly need to build libc++ from the package. Is the
2009 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
I've tried to write a DFGPrinter based on the CFGPrinter, as you suggested, but encountered problems. The GraphWriter expects GraphTraits<GraphType>::nodes_begin()/nodes_end(). The way this is implemented in CFG.h, a function is a graph of basic blocks. A GraphTraits<Function*> inherits from GraphTraits<BasicBlock*>, and implements those nodes_begin()/nodes_end()
2005 Dec 28
1
[Fwd: Re: R on Mandriva 2006]
Apologies for the empty post that went to the list... On ??????, ???????????????????? 28, 2005 9:11, Paolo Bulla wrote: > Hello anyone, > I'm trying to install R on Mandriva 2006 distribution via rpm file with the > line > urpmi R-2.0.0-1mdk.i586.rpm ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is an older rpm that Michele Alzeta contributed for Mandrake 10.0 (and that was a long time
2009 Aug 18
1
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ioannis Nousias < > ioannis.nousias at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> >> Also, LLVM-TV seems outdated. I've tried to compile it with 2.5 LLVM >> and >> >> got various errors due to API changes. Tried to correct them, but got >>
2008 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/tools/lto* rename heads up
I have experienced this with a svn 1.5 client but not with 1.4.6. Did anybody see this with a 1.4.6 (or older) client? Btw. what is the server version? Anyway this seems to be a bug in subversion. Cheers, Gabor PS: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=79361 On Jul 1, 5:27 am, Chris Lattner <clatt... at apple.com> wrote: > Devang removed the old
2009 Aug 13
1
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Hi Ioannis, On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 19:31 +0100, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Thanks Tobi for the tip. > > however I also need the Data-Flow-Graph of each basic block/functions. > As I said, I need a view of how the instructions 'link' to each other > (via registers or memory aliasing or whatnot) I believe that there is not yet a DOT printer for this kind of information.
2009 Aug 13
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:17 +0100, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I > > want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are > > chained together. The documentation mentions
2009 Aug 18
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ioannis Nousias < ioannis.nousias at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Also, LLVM-TV seems outdated. I've tried to compile it with 2.5 LLVM and > >> got various errors due to API changes. Tried to correct them, but got > >> overwhelmed. Has the project been abandoned? > > > > Yes, it is really really old and abandoned.
2009 Aug 13
2
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Chris Lattner wrote: On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I > want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are > chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling > certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when >
2016 Mar 28
2
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hi Dimitry, I do not particularly need to build libc++ from the package. Is the name of the package's libc++, libcxx, because this is where the installation starts finding undefined references, during linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so. Please check below the first part of the log when the first error appear, I omited repeating results. Furthermore, the undefined references are
2008 Jul 18
4
Problems with dovecot/sieve and vacation
Hello, First of all, initial data: # dovecot --version 1.0.rc15 # dovecot -n # /etc/dovecot.conf protocols: imaps pop3s disable_plaintext_auth: yes login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login login_max_processes_count: 256
2012 Jul 29
2
Error in for-loop
Hello erverybody, I have a problem with my second for-loop. 1. First i read the tables. datos.mx1 <- read.table('PETmx1.csv',head=TRUE,sep=';') datos.min <- read.table('PETmin.csv',head=TRUE,sep=';') http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4638257/PETmx1.csv PETmx1.csv http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4638257/PETmin.csv PETmin.csv names(datos.mx1)
2016 Mar 26
0
llvm build failed while Linking CXX shared library ../../../lib/libc++.so
Hi Ioannis, If you only want the clang static analyzer, there is no need to check out and build libc++ as part of the process. The rest of the build can just use the system C++ library, which will be libstdc++ on Xubuntu. That said, without the full build log, it is hard to say what went wrong. Specifically, which references were undefined? -Dimitry > On 26 Mar 2016, at 16:04, Ioannis
2006 Nov 08
3
How to implement status codes in DB and Rails
This is more of a design issue I''m wrestling with, and was wondering what other people are doing. I have a products table with status values of In Stock, Out of Stork or Discontinued. This is unlikely to change any time soon. Approach A, is to have thses actual values in the status column, at least the meaning is very apparent, yet querying for products with a specific status could