similar to: [LLVMdev] llc and debug information

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Nick Jalbert <jalbert at eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm having an issue with debug information and llc.  A test program: > #include <iostream> > using namespace std; > void foo() { >     cout << "My return address is " << __builtin_return_address(0) << >         endl << flush; > }

Thanks for the quick responses, but unfortunately still no luck: > llvm-g++ -g -O0 -c -emit-llvm test.cpp > llc -O0 test.o > g++ test.o.s > ./a.out My return address is 0x400bb2 > addr2line 0x400bb2 ??:0 Also to further implicate llc, this works: > llvm-g++ -g -O0 -S test.cpp > g++ test.s > ./a.out My return address is 0x400bf9 > addr2line 0x400bf9

Nick Jalbert wrote: > Thanks for the quick responses, but unfortunately still no luck: > > > llvm-g++ -g -O0 -c -emit-llvm test.cpp > > llc -O0 test.o > > g++ test.o.s > > ./a.out > My return address is 0x400bb2 > > addr2line 0x400bb2 > ??:0 > > Also to further implicate llc, this works: > > > llvm-g++ -g -O0 -S test.cpp >

The following two files correct problems with the ComboBox implementation. You will also need my typemap.i.patch file (forthcoming) in order for the void * typemap to work properly (I think). Roy _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing list wxruby-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users

> That's a weird one. Does addr2line work? > $ addr2line -e CGF.so <address> cafxx at ubuntu:~/Projects/llvm2/Debug+Asserts/bin$ objdump -t ../lib/CGF.so | grep flatten 0000000000005622 l F .text 0000000000000aa6 _ZN12_GLOBAL__N_111CGFFunction7flattenEv 00000000000041d6 l F .text 000000000000049c _ZN12_GLOBAL__N_111CGFCallSite7flattenEv

> Are you loading the shared library directly from the build directory, > or are you installing it first? I'm invoking it directly, I guess:./opt -load=CGF.so -cgf -debug test.S should I install it? (I have no idea about how to do it, though...) > If you run "file CGF.so" on the file you actually load, does it say it > is stripped or non-stripped? cafxx at

Hi, I configure llvm to generate code for alpha. I use a the following steps to generate code from the source files: 1) llvm-gcc -c main.c -emit-llvm main.bc 2) opt -load <library fo myPass> -myPass main.bc main.opt.bc 3) llc -march=alpha main.opt.bc -o main.S 4) alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu-as main.S -o main.o Most of the files that i compile run just fine. Suddenly, i have hit on a file

On Jun 24, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Carlo Alberto Ferraris wrote: > >> Are you loading the shared library directly from the build directory, or are you installing it first? > I'm invoking it directly, I guess: ./opt -load=CGF.so -cgf -debug test.S > should I install it? (I have no idea about how to do it, though...) > >> If you run "file CGF.so" on the file

Hi Ian, I am trying to add supporting dumping 32-bit guest on arm32 to see what happened in my dom0 kernel when booting. It seems gvirt_to_maddr() is not workable under arm32. But why has it been implemented both in include/asm-arm/arm{32,64}/page.h? Thanks. Baozi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Hi, all When compiling a program with -g -O0, and if we have a PC, then with addr2line, we can get the line number of the instruction. My quesions are: what is the result of Phi node instruction, can we get the similar results ? -- Best Regards! Eric Lew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> On 30 Sep 2020, at 21:42, Jason Keltz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 9/30/2020 3:01 PM, Remy Zandwijk via samba wrote: >>>>> On the client, add: >>>>> >>>>> gensec_gssapi:requested_life_time = <int> # seconds >>>>> >>>>> to smb4.conf. E.g. a ticket life time of one hour:

Hi, Daniel I want to profile load/store operations, in order to reduce the overhead of profiling, I try to instrument the optimized llvm ir, which has phi nodes. BTW, when the value of some load/store operations may have multi-source, then the load will be translated into phi nodes, and all phi nodes are placed in the front of BB. Sometimes, the position is not where the load happens, is there

> Cool, can you use clang 3.3 then? :) I can, but digging deeper I see that the compiler-rt sanitizer tests depend on just-built-clang for its object instrumentation. The next time the instrumentation changes, I'd expect those tests to break. If the lit tests that require -fsanitize were moved to the clang repo, then I think it'd be safe to build compiler-rt with clang 3.3 or gcc

Good morning, What is the general consensus about using LLVM 2.9 vs tip of tree for developing new backends? Is LLVM 2.9 still recent enough to make forward porting easy once 3.0 comes out? Is tip of tree considered stable enough for non-core development? My reason for asking is that a fellow grad student and I are about to start implementing a new backend for RISK-V - a research

On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > Hi Louis, > I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done? > By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work for me because gssproxy), do you do this before accessing root files..? > sudo root > kinit -k 'host$' > OK, after a bit of a battle, I now have a Centos 7 Unix

Hi, TL;DR - We should update the bot(s) responsible for building the LLVM documentation so that they use recommonmark 0.5.0, and apply https://reviews.llvm.org/D63211. Full context: I recently started trying to build the sphinx docs. However, a change by Jordan (r363100) resulted in me no longer being able to build them, even though the build bots were green and he could build them himself.

On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > > On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>> Hi Louis, >>> I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done? >>> By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work >>> for me because

(resurrecting the thread, as much is discussed here already) Formulating Kostya's suggestion: What do you think of compiling LLVM sources into ASan/TSan runtime by just taking the library sources, providing custom compiler (target) flags *and* a flag "-Dllvm=__sanitizer_llvm"? Yeah, it's hacky and applicable to LLVM libs, but OTOH we don't plan to use smth else for now (in

On 11/9/2020 3:00 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 09/11/2020 19:41, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I have Samba AD configured correctly, and can mount kerberized NFS >> from all the CentOS 7 clients.? I'm not able to use "root" on the >> client even though the nfs export specifies the option: >> no_root_squash option.

Hi All, I want to change debug information of an llvm instruction so that the modified debug info is subsequently passed to executable binary. So if I use "addr2line" utility on the binary, it will return my modified debug information. I've tried to change by using the following code snippet: MDNode *N = Inst->getMetadata("dbg"); DebugLoc Loc =