similar to: [LLVMdev] [OT] GCC specs language and adding options

To add to what Duncan said, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I have been trying to get to grips with GCC's specs language in order to add > COFF and ELF emission options. Good luck. :) > I have noticed that the '-emit-llvm-bc' option does not appear to work at > all either with -S or without, giving

I was able to also build sparky (http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky/) at -O4 under llvm-gcc-4.2 and llvm-g++-4.2 on darwin with minor patches... --- sparky/c++/_tkinter.c.orig 2009-01-30 22:14:28.000000000 -0500 +++ sparky/c++/_tkinter.c 2009-01-30 22:16:40.000000000 -0500 @@ -3089,6 +3089,9 @@ } } +PyMODINIT_FUNC +init_tkinter(void)

mobi phil wrote: > thanks, sounds great, heard about llvm-lto, but was not following in > details. I have an llvm-lto in my dev branch build....now what I do not > find are some example on how to use it for link time inline-ing. In > worst case have to deal with the overhead to experiment With what linker? LLVM LTO is available by default with Apple's XCode development

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:57:28AM -0800, Devang Patel wrote: > Hi Jack, > > On Jan 25, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > Doing that changes the error messages into a bus > > error on the darwin linker. > > > Pl. file bugzilla report (or radar) with a reproducible test case so > that we can investigate this linker crash. > > As you

Hi everyone, Both llvm-gcc and clang would use llvm as its backend. Dose everyone know the difference of bitcode generated by llvm-gcc and llvm? Or actually they are same, like if I use the same compiler options, like -O4. Any help is appreciated. Best, Yuxi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I need advice in instrumenting programs using liblto and gold plugin. Specifically, I added my pass in tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp. My pass inserts functions (myLoad and myStore) for some load and store instructions. The functions exist in a library file. I found that the approach works for the example in the link: http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html $ llvm-gcc -flto a.c -c -o a.o $ ar q

Hi John, Thank you for your advice. LIBS and LDFLAGS work for the configure script, but they gave errors in the make stage for apache and mysql. I used either of the following ones with other flags: - export LIBS="-L/home/sangmin/Dropbox/Falcon/bin/ -ldummy" - export LDFLAGS="-L/home/sangmin/Dropbox/Falcon/bin/ -ldummy" Here are the error messages: Compile error (apache):

Usage of the builtin appears independent of LTO, see below. With any of -fno-builtin, -fno-builtin-memcpy, and -ffreestanding, which are all typically used to prevent usage of memcpy calls, we still always get a memcpy builtin in TlsDriverEntryPoint(). I see this even without -flto (e.g. try with just -emit-llvm). I guess it is because this memcpy is not coming from the original source, but

On 3/24/11 6:23 PM, Sangmin Park wrote: > Hi, > > I need advice in instrumenting programs using liblto and gold plugin. > Specifically, I added my pass in tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp. > My pass inserts functions (myLoad and myStore) for some load and store > instructions. > The functions exist in a library file. > > I found that the approach works for the example in

Yeah, it crashes indeed. I can reproduce the problem locally. Let me see what is going on. On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:00 PM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote: > In my previous test case, after add the `-fno-builtin` to clang then > build, the lld-link still has same crash as below: > > > > $ make > >

Hi Shahzad, > Is it possible that we can use LLVM optimization beside O1, O2, O3 > along with dragonegg plugin? sure, try this: gcc -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so ...other_options_here... -S -o - -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-ir-optimize=0 | opt -pass1 -pass2 ... Here -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir tells it to output LLVM IR rather than target assembler.

Hello. I'm posting this question here, because there seem to be no LLD-specific mailing list. Sorry in advance if this is wrong one. I compile two C source with following command: clang -flto -o %name.bc %name.c LLVM is augmented with my custom pass, which amongst other things create a global with appending linkage: @myvar = appending constant [1 x [1 x i8]*] ... I also have another pass

lld should not crash in this case (so that's a bug that needs fixing), but setting it aside, did you try adding `-fno-builtin` to clang so that clang doesn't handle `memcpy` as a built-in function? On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:46 PM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Rui, > > For the test case in my previous email, if I change the `memcpy` to > `foobar` in

+Peter Collingbourne <pcc at chromium.org> LTO is used in this test case, and one source file defines its own `memset` function while the other file uses llvm.memset. Looks like LTO is confused by the user-defined memset. Could you take a look? Steven, Do you need to use LTO? I thought that LTO is a workaround to not produce an object file that cannot be handled by your ELF-to-COFF

Thanks alot Chad for quick response. Does this means that, we can not use LLVM optimizations except O1, O2, O3, O4 and unroll-loops with clang? One more thing I would like to know that If I want to process multiple modules with opt at the same time like opt -adce *.bc then how is it possible with opt in one go, if I process all the bytecode files within Makefile. Thanks. Shahzad On Thu, Jun

Hi LLVM, I am using 3.0, and I have a question about the __thread in c and thread_local in LLVM IR: O1-O4 and the final linked code behave differently. //////////////////////////////////// The following C code is from the LLVM testcase (SingleSource/UnitTests/Threads/2010-12-08-tls.c) #include <stdio.h> __thread int a = 4; int foo (void) { return a; } int main (void) {

Hi Shahzad, > I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to > produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is > producing an error > > $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c > -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce this won't work because you aren't passing the IR to opt (you need -o - for that if using a pipe) and you

Hi Steven, One thing I noticed is that you are defining `memcpy`, which clang has an intrinsic with the same name. Can you try renaming it to a random name, like `foobar`, to see if the problem still exists? On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:10 AM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote: > I’ve submitted a BZ for this issue as below: > > > > Bug 42626 - lld-link crash when

Hi Rui, We met a lld-link crash problem when build 32bits openssl1.0 with LTO in uefi firmware. We narrow down and figure out a simple test case to reproduce this problem as blow. Please advise. Thank you! $ cat main.c void TlsDriverEntryPoint () { unsigned char *ret = 0; const unsigned char cryptopro_ext[17] = {0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,

On 2009-12-23 08:22, Li Shengmei wrote: > > Hi, all > > I use llvm-gcc –O4 to compile SPEC 2000, some benchmarks > can’t be built successfully, such as 164.gzip, 175.vpr etc. > > The error messages are as follows. > > > > …… > > zh.o unlzw.o unpack.o unzip.o util.o zip.o -o gzip > > bits.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized