similar to: [LLVMdev] Fwd: [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Building llvm-gcc with llvm-2.5 debian packages

Mikael Lepistö wrote: > On 15.9.2009, at 12:11, Duncan Sands wrote: > > >> Hi Pekka, >> >> >>> To put it the another way: is there a reason to disallow >>> compiling llvm-gcc (optionally) against an installed LLVM (e.g. >>> from the Debian package)? It seems to work fine with this patch >>> Mikael posted. >>>

Hi, I've been encountering a problem with function pass manager with llvm-2.6. Somehow system does not know how to create analysis pass if it's required by some other pass. I got following after adding various debug prints to PassManager.cpp I got following results for my reduced test program which just loads module and then tries to make a function pass manager. elhigu at

Hi, I've been hitting my head to wall two days now. This is practically my first contact with InstrInfo.td files. Is there any tutorial how to make this kind of stuff? Or should I just keep on studying Sparc and other backends? So I added new intrinsic to llvm/include/llvm/TCEInstrinsics.td: def int_tce_customop : Intrinsic<[llvm_void_ty, llvm_ptr_ty, llvm_vararg_ty], [],

On 15.9.2009, at 12:11, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Pekka, > >> To put it the another way: is there a reason to disallow >> compiling llvm-gcc (optionally) against an installed LLVM (e.g. >> from the Debian package)? It seems to work fine with this patch >> Mikael posted. > > I think it would be great if llvm-gcc could be built against > an installed LLVM.

Hi Pekka, > To put it the another way: is there a reason to disallow > compiling llvm-gcc (optionally) against an installed LLVM (e.g. > from the Debian package)? It seems to work fine with this patch > Mikael posted. I think it would be great if llvm-gcc could be built against an installed LLVM. However my impression was that Mikael's original patch would break building against

On May 4, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Mikael Lepistö wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to set tbgen to be installed with llvm? For our > project http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/#tta-tce it would be very > helpful, because our tools generate compiler backend plugins in the > fly for each customized processor and plugin generation needs tbgen > for handling td files. Sure,

Chris Lattner wrote: > > On May 4, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Mikael Lepistö wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Would it be possible to set tbgen to be installed with llvm? For our >> project http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/#tta-tce it would be very >> helpful, because our tools generate compiler backend plugins in the >> fly for each customized processor and plugin

Hi, Would it be possible to set tbgen to be installed with llvm? For our project http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/#tta-tce it would be very helpful, because our tools generate compiler backend plugins in the fly for each customized processor and plugin generation needs tbgen for handling td files. Because of tbgen not beeing distributed, our users cannot use llvm from their favorite

Mikael Lepistö wrote: > Anybody has an opinion would it be good thing to add support for > llvm-gcc to be able to be built with existing llvm installation? To put it the another way: is there a reason to disallow compiling llvm-gcc (optionally) against an installed LLVM (e.g. from the Debian package)? It seems to work fine with this patch Mikael posted. For us at TCE project* it's a

On 3/11/13 6:32 AM, Mikael Lepistö wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing llvm pass for OpenCL code which does some memory checking to > verify that code does not access memory outside of the programs own > statically allocated areas. If you're looking to see if your program only accesses in-bounds memory, SAFECode and Address Sanitizer may be able to do this for you already. If

Hi, I have written new dummy target to llvm-gcc for our processor architecture, which contains basically only the information which is necessary to generate llvm byte code. I could check tomorrow in work, which parts of llvm- gcc had to be altered for our "tce-llvm-gcc" cross-compiler. I also hardcoded compiler to use llvm-ld and llvm-as as it's bintools, for being able to

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, [UTF-8] Mikael Lepist? wrote: > >>> def MOVNTPSmr : PSI<0x2B, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins i128mem:$dst, >>> VR128:$src), >>> "movntps {$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", >>> [(int_x86_sse_movnt_ps addr:$dst, VR128:$src)]>; >>> >>> There is corresponding code in llvm-gcc to tell GCC how to

Hi, I'm doing llvm pass for OpenCL code which does some memory checking to verify that code does not access memory outside of the programs own statically allocated areas. To make dynamic check generation easier, I would like to collect all allocas and global variable definitions and create one big memory structure (for each global, local and private) containing all the allocated memory as

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Mikael Lepist� wrote: >> I was talking with aKor in #llvm how we could implement custom operation >> support for our ASIP architecture. We came into solution that the best >> way would be to write new custom operation intrinsic and optimization >> pass for raising certain type of function calls to those intrinsics

> From: Mikael Lepist? <mikael.lepisto at tut.fi> > > Hi, Hi Mikael > I was talking with aKor in #llvm how we could implement custom operation > support for our ASIP architecture. We came into solution that the best > way would be to write new custom operation intrinsic and optimization > pass for raising certain type of function calls to those intrinsics > (similar

Hi, I was talking with aKor in #llvm how we could implement custom operation support for our ASIP architecture. We came into solution that the best way would be to write new custom operation intrinsic and optimization pass for raising certain type of function calls to those intrinsics (similar to raising mallocs). Basically our custom operation are like calls, with operand name and multiple

Hi, We have been working on porting llvm-gcc crosscompiler (basically I had to create new dummy target configuration with some minimal information about the our processor, endianess, type sizes, etc.) which compiles llvm bytecode (doesn't compile native binaries nor assembler) for our processor architecture and new llvm target for our custom processor. We already managed to compile also

Boris, > Yes, I know that. configure --target=a-b-c will fail because there > is no such stuff known in gcc. So, what is the answer/consequence? An > existing gcc back-end for architecture "a" is a precondition for a > LLVM back-end for architecture "a"? No. This is requirement of using gcc as a frontend. This looks pretty weird, but it is: frontend should

Hi, I wrote an LLVM blog post about our use of LLVM in the TCE project and a bit of a background for the TCE project in general. I hope some of you will find it interesting :) http://blog.llvm.org/2010/06/tce-project-co-design-of-application.html -- Pekka

Hi there, i created a Function Pass to retrieve the Control/Data Flow Graph from a simple program, now i would like to statically schedule the Instructions. Is this possible by starting to modify the SelectionDAG Files ? Or can i even build a "standalone" custom scheduler? Thank you very much for any tipps. Ben