similar to: [LLVMdev] How to express physical register dependencies between instructions

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:32:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy > way [1]. > > To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to > the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in > that way, but not all. The goal of this work is to make the notation >

Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy way [1]. To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in that way, but not all. The goal of this work is to make the notation consistent, and finally get rid of the gross hacks. Having whitespaces after -I does not matter since commit

A physical register cannot be live across the block. So it must have a use in the block or it must be marked dead. From your dump, it looks like the CCFLAGS defs are not being marked dead. It's unclear where things went wrong, but you can step through LiveVariables to debug this. Evan On Jan 9, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Christian Sayer wrote: > Hello, > > For my backend, I define and

Hi. On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:37 PM Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote: > > Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy > way [1]. > > To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to > the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in > that way, but not all. The goal of this

Hello, For my backend, I define and use a CC register similiarly to the EFLAGS register in X86 (I call it CCFLAGS). But if I make all arithmetic/logic instructions affect it ('let Defs = [CCFLAGS] in...' in InstrInfo.td) I run into // The only case we should have a dead physreg here without a killing or // instruction where we know it's dead is if it is live-in to the function

Evan, >A physical register cannot be live across the block. So it >must have a use in the block or it must be marked dead. From >your dump, it looks like the CCFLAGS defs are not being marked >dead. It's unclear where things went wrong, but you can step >through LiveVariables to debug this. Thanks for your response. I did quite some stepping through the llc passes, and it

Hi Jani, On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 06:51:09PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > With the -Wformat-truncation warnings fixed, finish the job started in > commit a61ddb4393ad ("drm: enable (most) W=1 warnings by default across > the subsystem"), and enable that warning too. > > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> When it is enabled for all of drm then the

Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy way [1]. To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in that way, but not all. The goal of this work is to make the notation consistent, and finally get rid of the gross hacks. Having whitespaces after -I does not matter since commit

Hi, I've the following error when I want to create a conditionnal redirector in samba 4 : " server complex operation 'IpValidate' not implemented  " Version : Version 4.6.7-Ubuntu Not using bind9 but Samba 4 DNS internal Must I user bind 9 ? My goal is to create un approbation between AD2016 et samba 4. Regard -- *Hervé* *HÉNOCH* *Responsable informatique* Tél. :

With the -Wformat-truncation warnings fixed, finish the job started in commit a61ddb4393ad ("drm: enable (most) W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem"), and enable that warning too. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> --- Gut feeling says there are more issues, and my configs just don't catch them all, but let's see what the build bots have to

Hi Eli, Thanks again for your reply. I am unsure about implementing the getCrossCopyRegClass for my target. My target does not support or allow moves to and from the SR. The SR exists because it has implicit involvement in some instructions, but it is opaque to the assembler and to the user as a register. I mean, there are no instructions to directly move or read it, or even access it directly.

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 17:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > It seems that there should be a better way to do it, > but this works too. In some cases there might be: > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ > ?# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License (version 2 > only) > ?# as published by the Free

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 17:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > It seems that there should be a better way to do it, > but this works too. In some cases there might be: > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ > ?# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License (version 2 > only) > ?# as published by the Free

Recently trying to build nouveau.ko out of the kernel tree results in the following error for me (in-kernel builds are fine): uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h:30:17: fatal error: drm.h: No such file or directory This can be fixed by adding include/uapi/drm to the include path. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- IIUC this problem has already been brought up - it only seems

I'd like to use lattice to make graphics under conditional structure like : if (TRUE) { barchart(....) dev.print(png, file = "image1.png", width = 600) } but there's nothing in the output file. It seems that it's too long to print graphic into the graphical output and the saved file is a blank picture. it works if I do that without the conditionnal structure. it doesn't

Hi, What does it mean if a custom Node in the instructions description file is declared to have a Chain? Looking at different backends, I have the impression that it describes some sort of side effect and usually used for nodes affecting the control flow. But I'm not quite sure. Can someone describe the semantics of this property and also what is a typical usage of it? In particular, I have

__CHECK_ENDIAN__ isn't on by default presumably because it triggers too many sparse warnings for correct code. But virtio is now clean of these warnings, and we want to keep it this way - enable this for sparse builds. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- It seems that there should be a better way to do it, but this works too. drivers/block/Makefile | 1

I'm and Asterisk@home user - been so now for almost a year. Lately, I've upgraded to the latest & greatest.. (which is built on 1.2.5) and am unable to install oh323. I've already asked over at the (A@H) Sourceforge forum but no one seems to think it worth answering. The error I get is pretty obvious but I don't know where to go from here. More importantly, I need to have

Dear all, Using lattice I would like to print a conditionnal plot of 32 panels in a limited number of panels (eg 4) in each of several pages: xyplot(pds~time|Idnid,data=croispond3,layout=c(4,4)) This works well in principle, but the pages are printed without any possibility of stopping the printing process before each next page. I have tried par(ask=T) before the xyplot command line but

All, I have been trying to get CAPI4Linux working on my machine and being frank am failing miserably! I am looking for any help available, I am real newbie (so please be gentle) and choose to run Mandrake 9.2 as it appears quite friendly (or so I thought!). I have been following the guidance found at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+How+to+connect+with+CAPI for the AVM card (actually I