similar to: [LLVMdev] sys::MemoryFence() using __sync_synchronize() with GCC on ARM does not generate a memory fence

One of the things that may taint my prior analysis... At the time I was last evaluating Windows git GUIs, I was looking for something that would make handling .patch and .diff files easier. In particular, if a patch didn't apply, I really wanted to get some visual indication of which hunk failed, and some interface to resolve the conflict. I didn't find any tools that handled that

Hi all when i compiled llvm-3.0 with icedtea1.11.4 together,A memory_barrier error happened ,And now I write to all of you for the following questions need your help and suggestion : 1, Is any function which can replace the "make_function" in the following function, 2 , Or is there any different paramters in make_function with the similar action with the following one

Sourcetree is pretty good on windows, and I hear ok things about Git Extensions. I have not used the GitHub app though. I typically use Sourcetree to view the logs, and command line for everything else. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Craig, Ben via llvm-dev Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 10:01 AM To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev]

hello, yesterday I tried to package dovecot-2.0beta5 + pigeonhole from Mercurial repository. I put pigeonhole as a subdir in the dovecot sourcetree. Following http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole/raw-file/tip/INSTALL I called ./autogen.sh; ./configure --with-dovecot=..; make In the buildprocess I saw this output ( from autogen.sh ): Putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `..'.

Just passing this bit of feedback on! :) jack. ----- Forwarded message from Thorsten Titze <thorsten.titze@hangar-eleven.de> ----- Delivered-To: jack@64.139.18.57 Delivered-To: jack@icecast.org Delivered-To: jack@xiph.org Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 12:42:19 +0200 To: feedback@vorbis.com From: Thorsten Titze <thorsten.titze@hangar-eleven.de> Subject: Ogg Vorbis RC2 library for Dreamcast

vitamin wrote: > > agusmba wrote: > > > > > I guess you'll have to compile it or extract it from the winetest test suite. > > > > > > I'm a bit reluctant to download the whole sourcetree plus all the related dev packages just to get the dinput_test.exe.so. I googled around for that file but couldn't find any binary online. Maybe I'm

hi, i'm tried to setup a samba-server with ACL support. i realized that this is still not what Users might look for. here are some things that are anoying: - POSIX-ACLs only support rwx - a user, group or everybody with the rights rwx seem to have "Full Access" (in the Windows-Explore) although "Full Access" includes the ability to change the ACL - but this is only

Hello Vorbis People, I just want to announce, that my opensource mediaplayer for Linux (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gmerlin) has now full read/write support for Ogg Vorbis files. The necessary Vorbis libraries (Version RC1) are included in my tarball. Possible are the following things: - Playback and seeking in all Ogg Vorbis files I've tested so far - Conversion of any supported audio

I've managed to get some more debug info in the logs. I cleared the log, changed the log debug level to 4 and started icecast, shout and a client. Here are some relevant lines from the log : CLIENT CONNECTION : [01/Mar/2001:11:36:58] [6:Connection Handler] Accepted client 2 from ... This client connection ends up as source thread 5. The first error is mentioned after about 20 minutes.

Hi, Some time in the last few weeks I noticed my cmake build of svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 start to warn about atomics being unavailable and thus building thread-unsafe. I just looked into it and found an easy solution, using the atomic functions in <libkern/OSAtomic.h> in /usr/include. The attached patch does this and also modifies the cmake and autoconf tests to 'pass'

Hi Folks I recently got back the message below form a company I suggested supporting WINE with their software. Is there any answer - or is it, as they suggest, a lost cause? The error I get from WINE is: RTG Bills (title) ADO error 1AD ActiveX component can't create object [OK](button) Is there anyway to have ActiveX & ADO work with WINE? Regards, Morgan. > No, RTG Bills won't

Hi list! I''m trying to run 2.4.29-xenU with grsec. Jacob Gorm Hansen said couple of weeks ago, that grsec should work with xen when pax is disabled.. Well, to get the kernel compiling there''s some source hacking that needs to be done.. I''ll describe what I did and what error I got: I downloaded xen-2.0-testing-src.tgz and extracted it. I edited the toplevel Makefile

Hi, I get this error when compiling a code that contains "__sync_synchronize()" fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x85ddfb0: ch = AtomicFence 0x85fd8d8, 0x85c7890, 0x85dd9e8 [ORD=4] [ID=27]example.c:378:13 0x85c7890: i64 = Constant<7> [ID=5]example.c:378:13 0x85dd9e8: i64 = Constant<1> [ID=6]example.c:378:13 I believe it should be equivalent to

In the current trunk, System/Atomic.[h,cpp] define void llvm::sys::MemoryFence(). This conflicts with the MemoryFence macro in <windows.h> and (since it's a preprocessor macro, and not a scoped function definition) causes the sys::MemoryFence definition on Atomic.cpp:23 to explode, as it's nonsensically expanded to a cl intrinsic (_mm_mfence). This breaks the Visual Studio build.

On May 28, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley wrote: > In the current trunk, System/Atomic.[h,cpp] define void > llvm::sys::MemoryFence(). This conflicts with the MemoryFence macro in > <windows.h> and (since it's a preprocessor macro, and not a scoped > function definition) causes the sys::MemoryFence definition on > Atomic.cpp:23 to explode, as it's

On May 17, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Owen, I would really rather that you didn't take this path. Threading > support in LLVM should always be optional: it should be possible to > use LLVM on systems where we don't have support for threading > operations. Indeed, some systems don't support threads! I'm not trying to make it required. I had provided

Is this actually the case? I can't find it documented anywhere on MSDN or the rest of the internet. --Owen On Jun 1, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley wrote: > Yes, indeed. > > On May 28, 10:41 pm, Owen Anderson <resis... at mac.com> wrote: >> >> Wait, it defines MemoryFence() AND MemoryBarrier()?? >> >> Sheesh, they had to take all the

Owen Anderson wrote: > Is this actually the case? I can't find it documented anywhere on > MSDN or the rest of the internet. C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\Include>grep -n -F MemoryFence WinNT.h 2231:#define MemoryFence _mm_mfence C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\Include>grep -n -F MemoryBarrier WinNT.h 2288:#define MemoryBarrier __faststorefence

Hello, I trying TSAN on Darwin on LLVM itself (sanitizing multi-threaded ThinLTO link). However I see two main issues on my debug build: 1) Statistics: the pre/post increment is not safe, it seems to be acknowledge in the code itself: // FIXME: This function and all those that follow carefully use an // atomic operation to update the value safely in the presence of // concurrent

I tried checking out the latest llvm/clang from SVN (as of a few hours ago) and compiling it (clang 3.6.1 doesn't compile 3.7 because it fails a version check, so I repeated the technique of compiling with Microsoft C++ first, then using the resulting clang-cl.exe). It fails with a bunch of error messages along the lines of: LLVMSupport.lib(Atomic.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external