similar to: [LLVMdev] Cross-module optimization

Hi! I have this error while building my code: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!") Actually I'm trying to load functions from .bc file and use them in the code that I'm building with IRBuilder. I found that function parameter type is %struct.reValue* and

Hi Andrii, > May be is there some workaround? Like joining all the modules in one > and then optimize it. Unfortunately I couldn't find a way to join modules. llvm-link does this. Ciao, Duncan.

Hello, I'm using autotools to build my little lang. So I want to have something like this in my Makefile.am: mylang_SOURCES = mylang.cpp mylang_LDADD = mylib.a `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core jit native ipo` But automake complains: tools/Makefile.am:8: linker flags such as `--cppflags' belong in `mylang_LDFLAGS I tried different workarounds but nothing helps :( The only

Hi Andrii-- They're not equivalent as far as LLVM is concerned - the parameter type is { { i32 }. { i64 } }* whereas the function is being given a { i32, i64 }*. Probably the easiest way to work around this is a simple bitcast. Alastair On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:32, Andrii Vasyliev wrote: > Hi! > > I have this error while building my code: > Assertion failed: ((i >=

>> May be is there some workaround? Like joining all the modules in one >> and then optimize it. Unfortunately I couldn't find a way to join modules. > llvm-link does this. Thanks for answer, Duncan! But I want to do it in my program and then run it with ExecutionEngine... Hey, but I took a look inside of llvm-link and found a Linker class which does modules linking! :) So,

Hi I have a program similar to kaleidoscope with same optimization passes. It works fine. But when I tried to add Constant Merge Pass with a line: OurFPM.add(createConstantMergePass()); the program died with segmentation fault. Then I tried to add the same line to native kaleidoscope from http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html and I've got the same segmentation fault. The backtrace

Hi, I am begineer to llvm, implementing a main.cpp from https://github.com/davidar/lljvm/blob/master/backend/main.cpp A) : When I am declaring a command: * PassManager PM* * PM.add(new DataLayout td)* It shows error: > *error: missing template arguments before ‘PM’* * PassManager PM;* ^ >*main_test.cpp:48:2: error: ‘PM’ was not declared in this scope* *

Hi Philip, I also tried that including file: #include "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h" but error remain same. Please help. On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 2:58 AM Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ratnesh, > > the PassManager used in that example has moved into the legacy namespace: > http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1legacy_1_1PassManager.html > >

Guys, Could you please clarify if SMP available for XEN on ARMv7 with virtualizations extensions? Browsing through stuff for Arndale I do see enabling secondary CPU on XEN site and SMP enabling on dom0 kernel site. But I do not see SMP infrastructure implementation on the XEN site. Sincerely, Andrii Anisov. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

Hi >>>>> "AV" == Andrii Vasyliev <andrii.vasyliev at gmail.com> writes: AV> Hello, I'm using autotools to build my little lang. So I want to AV> have something like this in my Makefile.am: AV> mylang_SOURCES = mylang.cpp mylang_LDADD = mylib.a `llvm-config AV> --cppflags --ldflags --libs core jit native ipo` AV> But automake complains:

Okay, so I am on OSX, I am trying to install the LLVM library. Trying to compile their simple example (http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl7.html) I keep on getting a host of errors, the source of which is its not finding any of the included files ( #include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h" #include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngine.h" #include

Hello, Could you please clarify what libs and utils Xen tools need to run? Is it possible link XEN tools statically? Is there a chance to setup busybox based system for Dom0? Sincerely, Andrii Anisov. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Hi I hope this is a proper place to put my question. I've compiled Kaleidoscope from "Adding JIT and Optimizer Support" tutorial. Basically it works just fine but when I try to run extern'ed putchard function it aborts. Please, tell me what am I doing wrong? Here is more information: My PC runs FreeBSD. I've copied the toy source code exactly and didn't change it.

I am working on high load daemon development, which listens on UDP and processes packets. Last few months I noticed some strange issue when it takes 500-700 ms to answer packet, while usually it takes 20 ms. I've run strace on all daemon processes and found this thing: 13:35:36.979887 stat("/etc/localtime", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2309, ...}) = 0 13:35:36.979944 write(3,

Hi I mean when I have in my program pointer to a function how should I build IR to call the function by the pointer? Or how can I create llvm::Function with a pointer to a function? I want to have something like this: int factorial (int n) { return n==0 ? 1 : n*factorial(n-1); } typedef int (*intFunc) (int); intFunc fptr = factorial; Value * N = ConstantInt::get(Type::Int32Ty,10);

Can you use an intermediate variable? TMP = `...` mylang_LDADD = ... $TMP On 2009-05-08, at 04:40, Andrii Vasyliev wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using autotools to build my little lang. > So I want to have something like this in my Makefile.am: > > mylang_SOURCES = mylang.cpp > mylang_LDADD = mylib.a `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core > jit native ipo` > >

IRBuilder is a templated class, and one of the template arguments is the constant folder to use. By default it uses the ConstantFolder class which does target-independant constant folding. If you want to disable constant folding you can specify the NoFolder class instead, i.e. declare the builder as follows: IRBuilder<true, llvm::NoFolder> builder(body) On 26 Nov 2013, at 19:23, Daniel

Hi Chris, On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 02:59:03PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jun 2, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > >> Can you give some background about what kinds of things you're > >> thinking > >> about for this? > > For example, when I have a function returning {i32, i32} and I want > > to add > > another i32 to that. If

I have had great luck in the last couple of months getting llvm to do cool stuff with directly linked modules using llvm-as and llvm-ld. Now, I would like to get some of the same functionality working through an ExecutionEngine; however, I am having trouble making functions call across module boundaries. I know from previous discussions on this list that what I am attempting should be easy. I

Hello, I'm not sure what I am trying to do is possible. I'm trying to create two modules, and call a function in one module from another module. First, a reassurance that I'm not trying to do something completely off the wall would be nice as I don't see any tutorials that do this. Second, any help getting this to work would be wonderful. Thanks, Aaron In my code, you'll