similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] MaximumSpanningTree goes generic.

Hi, I succeeded in converting the MaximumSpanningTree module to a generic one that is able to hold any kind of data. There was talk about puting this into llvm/ADT, is this implementation ready for that? Any complaints if I put this in? Thanks, Andi -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more information see

Hi, since the MaximumSpanningTree-Algorithm is useful in may ways it would be great to have this available as generic algorithm. (See http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090824/085454.html) Problem is: I can't get it to work. The attached patch (which depends on lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MaximumSpanningTree.* being removed before application) does not compile

Andreas Neustifter wrote: > $> .../lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MaximumSpanningTree.cpp:38: error: > 'stable_sort' is not a member of 'std' > > which I find kind of curious since std::stable_sort didn't make a > problem in the specific implementation. > I don't see anything that definitely pulls <algorithm> in, so it may be a case of one

I experienced FAIL: /localtmp/astifter/llvm/llvm-svn/test/FrontendC/2007-03-27-VarLengthArray.c Failed with exit(1) at line 1 while running: /nfs/a5/astifter/astifter/llvm/llvm-svn-obj/../llvm-svn-install/bin/llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -w -S /localtmp/astifter/llvm/l lvm-svn/test/FrontendC/2007-03-27-VarLengthArray.c -o - | /bin/grep {getelementptr inbounds \[0 x i32\]} child process exited abnormally

Felipe Lessa wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:40:45AM +0200, Sebastian Redl wrote: >> I think it would be best to use Mozilla's way for this. If we have any >> skilled vector artists, they could try to recreate the image as a vector >> graphic (it is not so complex as to prevent this) which would allow for >> free scaling. > > Actually even if you had an

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Albert Graef wrote: > Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this >> case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? > > Hmm, that one has its left wing cut off, that wreaks havoc on the symmetry. > > The 136x136 version at http://llvm.org/Logo.html seems perfect for

Hi, when I try to build libprofile with r80670 (both llvm and llvm-gcc) I get this error: make[1]: Entering directory `.../llvm-svn-debug-obj/runtime/libprofile' llvm[1]: Building Debug Bytecode Archive libprofile_rt.bca (internalize) llvm[1]: Installing Debug Shared Library /nfs/a5/astifter/astifter/llvm/llvm-svn-debug-obj/../llvm-svn-debug-install/lib/libprofile_rt.so 0 llvm-ld

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas >> Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Daniel! >>> >>> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>>> >>>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Andreas Neustifter wrote: > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > > > I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of > >

Hi Andreas, First, thanks again for undertaking this work and submitting it back. There is a lot of good stuff here and it would be great to see it get back into the tree. I have a few major high-level comments on the patch. First off, the patch is quite large and should be broken down into separate incremental changes which are easier to review and apply. I think the patches should more or less

Sorry, forgot attachment. On 23.07.09 07:40), Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Good Morning. > > On 22.07.09 14:47), Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >>> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >>> with the rest of this patch is that it

Hi Daniel, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > First, thanks again for undertaking this work and submitting it back. There is a > lot of good stuff here and it would be great to see it get back into the tree. Thanks for taking the time to review this, I know its a huge patch. I still have a few questions on how you would like this patch to be re-factored and split up. > [...]

Hi! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Sorry for the lag time... No problem. As long as I know that you get to it sometime its fine for me... > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas > Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> Hi Daniel! >> >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, since I'm planing on a whole bunch of changes in the area of the Profiling Infrastructure I would like to ask humbly if it is possible to have approve-after-commit permission for the following files: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfoLoader.h include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfoTypes.h

Hi, Tilmann Scheller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andreas > Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> Is there something wrong with my cross-compiler or is the llc-generated code bad? > Most likely the latter, the powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu target is not > officially supported by LLVM. In fact there is no support for the > 64-bit PowerPC

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of > the next patches so that you can work on them

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) Okay, here comes the next one. I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of the next patches so that you can work on them as you have time. Greetings, Andi - --

Hi Albert, Albert Graef wrote: > Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> I'm not an artist, so the simplifying is not so easy for me, but its >> true that that is the really hard part. So I did two full-scale sketches >> with different texts. > > Looks nice, even at 256 pixels. Just for the fun of it I sticked it on > http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/ (scaled to 128 pixels,

Albert Graef wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> I'm happy to announce that Apple has agreed to let llvm.org (and >> anyone else) use the great LLVM logo they designed for WWDC. If >> you're interested, you can see the full version of the logo on this >> page: >> http://llvm.org/Logo.html > > Looks cool! > > I'm awful at this kind of

Applied as r78477. I do have a few comments on the patch, below, but I'll wait to see where things are going before acting on them. :) -- > Index: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h > =================================================================== > + // MissingValue - The value that is returned for execution counts in case > + // no value is available. > +