similar to: [LLVMdev] Trouble with rewriting MaximumSpanningTree as template.

Andreas Neustifter wrote: > $> .../lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MaximumSpanningTree.cpp:38: error: > 'stable_sort' is not a member of 'std' > > which I find kind of curious since std::stable_sort didn't make a > problem in the specific implementation. > I don't see anything that definitely pulls <algorithm> in, so it may be a case of one

Hi Andreas, First, thanks again for undertaking this work and submitting it back. There is a lot of good stuff here and it would be great to see it get back into the tree. I have a few major high-level comments on the patch. First off, the patch is quite large and should be broken down into separate incremental changes which are easier to review and apply. I think the patches should more or less

Hi, I succeeded in converting the MaximumSpanningTree module to a generic one that is able to hold any kind of data. There was talk about puting this into llvm/ADT, is this implementation ready for that? Any complaints if I put this in? Thanks, Andi -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more information see

Hi, I succeeded in converting the MaximumSpanningTree module to a generic one that is able to hold any kind of data. There was talk about puting this into llvm/ADT, is this implementation ready for that? Any complaints if I put this in? Thanks, Andi -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more information see

Hi all, as proposed in http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-February/020396.html I implemented the algorithm presented in [Ball94]. It only instruments the minimal number of edges necessary for edge profiling. The main changes introduced by this patch are: *) a interface compatible rewrite of ProfileInfo *) a cleanup of ProfileInfoLoader (some functionality in ProfileInfoLoader

The comment says it was added due to a bug in MSVC 2013 implementation of stable_sort. Newer versions of MSVC have fixed this bug in stable_sort according to this webpage record https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/886652 Can we remove the check now? ~Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

To whom it may concern, I'm running some testcases(A and B) in Linux LLVM(built in Ubuntu16.04) and Windows LLVM(built by Visual Studio 2015), both of which were LLVM 4.0.0 and built with same source codes, but I got different assembly files(A_Linux != A_Windows, B_Linux = B_Windows). Privacy reasons prevent me from sharing my testcases here, sorry. I compared debug information and found the

In addition I think the LayoutPass std::stable_sort be replaced with std::sort as total ordering is guaranteed as each File would get an ordinal and each atom would get an ordinal too, after the below problem is fixed. Thanks Shankar Easwaran On 10/6/2013 10:54 PM, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like the the ELFPassFile doesnot get an ordinal value > assigned, as its

Hi Daniel, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > First, thanks again for undertaking this work and submitting it back. There is a > lot of good stuff here and it would be great to see it get back into the tree. Thanks for taking the time to review this, I know its a huge patch. I still have a few questions on how you would like this patch to be re-factored and split up. > [...]

Ping ? Do you think that we need to have an API in LinkingContext to return the next ordinal available, so that files created by passes can be assigned ordinals ? Thanks Shankar Easwaran On 10/6/2013 11:07 PM, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > In addition I think the LayoutPass std::stable_sort be replaced with > std::sort as total ordering is guaranteed as each File would get an >

Alright, I'm ready to nuke it. Last chance to say stop. For context of others, this has come up repeatedly: no one we know of is using EdgeProfiling.cpp, PathProfiling.cpp, and the lib/Analysis/Profile*Pass.cpp collection of tools. They haven't been updated since 2012 when Alastair Murray looked into this stuff, and both current efforts towards PGO are essentially *totally* different

Hi, when I try to build libprofile with r80670 (both llvm and llvm-gcc) I get this error: make[1]: Entering directory `.../llvm-svn-debug-obj/runtime/libprofile' llvm[1]: Building Debug Bytecode Archive libprofile_rt.bca (internalize) llvm[1]: Installing Debug Shared Library /nfs/a5/astifter/astifter/llvm/llvm-svn-debug-obj/../llvm-svn-debug-install/lib/libprofile_rt.so 0 llvm-ld

Hi, It looks like the the ELFPassFile doesnot get an ordinal value assigned, as its added in a pass. Is there a way to assign a file ordinal for the files added by Passes ? Till that time, I am going to XFAIL the ifunc test. More tests should fail, and am not sure why they are not failing. Thanks Shankar Easwaran -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted

Hi guys, I am trying to perform edge profiling using on hello.bc file by using following command opt -insert-edge-profiling hello.bc -o hello-edge.bc but I get the error that option "-insert-edge-profiling" is unknown. Can you please help me to solve the issue. Please note that I am following the paper available at this link http://llvm.org/pubs/2010-12-Preuss-PathProfiling.pdf

Hi, Zhao You can apply the attachment to LLVM 2.9 Release. It has been tested on FreeBSD/x86. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 -------------- next part -------------- diff -ruN llvm-2.9/CMakeLists.txt llvm-2.9.new/CMakeLists.txt --- llvm-2.9/CMakeLists.txt 2011-03-02

BTW, this will also remove the entire 'runtime' directory in the LLVM repository. Runtime libraries are now being developed in compiler-rt. That is where the GCDA profiling runtime already lives and any new instrumentation based profiling runtime would also likely live there. If the code in the existing runtime tree is needed to start building those, they can always be found in the VCS

Statistic.cpp uses std::stable_sort without including <algorithm>. -- Casey Carter Casey at Carter.net ccarter at uiuc.edu AIM: cartec69 -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20021027/4d75abdc/attachment.ksh>

In case others are interested in what happened with Casey's patches, here's the digest: > Issue: STLExtras.h includes a class mapped_iterator that uses > std::iterator_traits<> without including <iterator>. > Fix: have STLExtras.h include Support/iterator. Applied. > DSGraph.h has a prototype in it with a std::string& parameter, but does > not include

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > Ping ? > > Do you think that we need to have an API in LinkingContext to return the > next ordinal available, so that files created by passes can be assigned > ordinals ? > That API may work, but I don't think you always want to assign the largest file ordinal for a file created in

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I presume you mean, instead of assigning function arguments distinct ranks > (http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Reassociate_8cpp_source.html#l00282), we > should group function arguments in favor of existing pairings. Existing = pairings reassociate already chose before *not* existing