similar to: [LLVMdev] Listing all loops in a function

Hi, How do I access the loop variables in a loop. for(i = 0; i < N; i++) for(j = 0; j < M; j++) A[i][j+k] = i + j; Is there anyway for me to know that in A[i][j+k], i & j are loop variables whereas k is not! Regards, Prasenjit Chakraborty Performance Modeling and Analysis IBM Systems & Technology Lab

On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:46 AM, Prasenjit Chakraborty wrote: > > Hi, > How do I access the loop variables in a loop. > > for(i = 0; i < N; i++) > for(j = 0; j < M; j++) > A[i][j+k] = i + j; > > Is there anyway for me to know that in A[i][j+k], i & j are loop > variables > whereas k is not! The ScalarEvolution analysis can help here.

Hi, Please find attached the modified patch and description. We have modified and retested the patch taking into consideration the comments and inputs provided earlier. Thanks & Regards, soham -----Original Message----- From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:59 PM To: Chakraborty, Soham Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Chakraborty, Soham <Soham.Chakraborty at amd.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > We have implemented the rsqrt instruction generation for X86 target > architecture. We have introduced a flag -fp-rsqrt flag which controls the > generatation of X86 rsqrt instruction generation. > > We have observed minor effects on precision due to rsqrt and

Hello, I am having problems getting one xlite clients to communicate through asterisk. I am getting an error message: chan_sip.c:15593 handle_request_register: Registration from '"chinmay chakraborty"<sip:1234 at 10.44.32.193 <sip%3A1234 at 10.44.32.193>>' failed for '10.44.32.193' - No matching peer found sip show peers Name/username Host

The following code is causing an "UNREACHABLE executed!" and a stack dump, any ideas? namespace { struct myPass : public CallGraphSCCPass { static char ID; myPass() : CallGraphSCCPass(ID) {} virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.setPreservesAll(); AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); } virtual bool runOnSCC(CallGraphSCC &SCC)

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > The following code is causing an "UNREACHABLE executed!" and a stack dump, > any ideas? The stack might be handy. > namespace { >   struct myPass : public CallGraphSCCPass { >   static char ID; >   myPass() : CallGraphSCCPass(ID) {} >   virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage

UNREACHABLE executed! 0 opt 0x00000000008edc2f 1 opt 0x00000000008edfda 2 libpthread.so.0 0x00007f9c8e69bc60 3 libc.so.6 0x00007f9c8d986d05 gsignal + 53 4 libc.so.6 0x00007f9c8d98aab6 abort + 390 5 opt 0x00000000008da974 llvm::llvm_unreachable_internal(char const*, char const*, unsigned int) + 356 6 opt 0x000000000087e046 7 opt

Hi, (please Cc me) In xyplot (), type = "l" (or one that includes "l", *el*) is (generally) meaningful only when the 'x' variable is sorted. In practice, one either sorts the data frame before hand or writes a tiny panel function which sorts the supplied x and then calls the default panel.xyplot(). Trouble arises when there is a conditional variable as well as a

In addition to the link below, please check for functions like "llvm.debug.declare", "llvm.debug.value", as you will not get LoopInfo for these.   Pankaj   ________________________________ From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> To: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:08 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]

Thanks for the info. Curious, do you know if there is an opt that will put all loops, including nested ones, in functions (ie each loop in it's own function)? What I'm trying to do is create a way for each loop to have only one exit. I want all loops to be single exit loops? I can write my own pass but I'd rather not. I think that if I can put each loop into it's own function

Driver init call graph under baremetal: driver_init-> msix_capability_init-> msix_program_entries-> msix_mask_irq-> entry->masked = 1 request_irq-> __setup_irq-> irq_startup-> unmask_msi_irq-> msix_mask_irq-> entry->masked = 0 So

On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote: > >> From: Anirban Chakraborty [mailto:anirban.chakraborty at qlogic.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:04 PM >> To: Rose, Gregory V >> Cc: David Miller; netdev; Ben Hutchings; Kirsher, Jeffrey T >> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands >> >> >> On Jul 28,

On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote: > >> From: Anirban Chakraborty [mailto:anirban.chakraborty at qlogic.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:04 PM >> To: Rose, Gregory V >> Cc: David Miller; netdev; Ben Hutchings; Kirsher, Jeffrey T >> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands >> >> >> On Jul 28,

On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Saem Ghani wrote: > The patch below basically hammers out some ideas as to where I'd like > to take the passmanager in LLVM. I've tried thinking things through, > but I'm still a n00b, so some criticism would be more than welcome. =) > > Starting from line 191 down. If you're wondering why I created a > patch, well that's because I found

Hello I am facing a curious problem.I have a time series data with which i want to fit auto-regressive model of order p, where p runs from 1:9.I am using a for loop which will fit an AR(p) model for each value of p using the *ar.ols* function. I am using the following code for ( p in 1:9){ a=ar.ols (x=data.ts, order.max=p, demean=T, intercept=T) } Specifying the *order.max* to be p, it gives me a

In case a system is incapable of fax relay or if it is disabled, one of the easiest and safest options is to go for 40 kbps ADPCM compression (for fax upto 14.4 kbps)..even am new to this problem and the fair bit of seraching which i've done seems to suggest that the standard sloutions are to simply 'bypass' it else compress using ADPCM (40 k for fax upto 14.4 k, 32 k for fax upto 9.6

Hello: [Kindly Cc when replying] The question in a nutshell is this: Is there a more robust alternative to Ecdf ()? The details: I've used Ecdf () _a lot_ over the past few years and I have learned to live with its warnings. But I am running short on time and patience now [*] Here is a reproducible example: > library (Hmisc) > x <- read.csv ( file =

I completely agree with you. The source code I wrote here has the main function and is a complete code. That's why I was expecting load/store analysis could have been incorporated across the module. Thanks. On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by "use" check. > If you compile this with LTO and

On 1/10/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > Interesting approach. :) Thanks. > Comments below, with ***'s before the notes: > +class LoopPass : public Pass {}; // Temporary. > > *** I wouldn't worry about loop passes yet. Sure. > +class PassUnit { > + Pass *pass; > + > + enum Traversal { > + LINEAR, // Standard top down