similar to: [LLVMdev] Strange error in generated assembly

I'm trying to track down the problem with the assertion failure in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. This is the code: *case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot: *if* (GFI) { *const* Value *Alloca = I.getArgOperand(0); *const* Constant *TypeMap = cast<Constant>(I.getArgOperand(1)); * FrameIndexSDNode *FI = cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(getValue(Alloca).getNode());*

I've been absent from the list for a while due to a number of unexpected circumstances, including a hard drive failure on my primary desktop machine. However, the good news is that after 4 years of work, my LLVM-based compiler is nearing the state where I feel comfortable declaring an official 0.1 release. The language is called "Tart" and the one line summary is "Tart is to

Interestingly, I also get a similar error in a different executable (my unittest): pure virtual method called terminate called without an active exception 0 tartc 0x00000001010a8265 PrintStackTrace(void*) + 53 1 tartc 0x00000001010a88cc SignalHandler(int) + 364 2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff831341ba _sigtramp + 26 3 libSystem.B.dylib 0x7261742e65637365 _sigtramp +

On Apr 7, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Talin wrote: > > OK I've been checking this out some more, and the DIEs don't look valid to me. Take a look at this output from dwarfdump -v: > > 0x000000c7: TAG_subprogram [3] > 0x000000c8: AT_name( .debug_str[0x000001bd] = "construct" ) > 0x000000cc: AT_MIPS_linkage_name( .debug_str[0x000001c7] =

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I recently started getting this error when I try to debug my >>> LLVM-compiled program in GDB:

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and >> several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now >> getting a "pure virtual method called"

I figured that there might be others out there who are trying to figure out how to write a personality function, so I've attached the one I have written as an example. The code is straight ANSI C. I used the GCC version as a reference, but I re-wrote most of it, and made the syntax more like the LLVM style. I also drew from a number of other personality functions for other languages that

Well, I am much happier now that I understand about dsymutil, and can actually step through my program in gdb. However, there are still some issues that are puzzling me. 1) First off, the debugger appears to stop at odd points. The IR for my main function looks correct to me: define i32 @"main(tart.core.Array[tart.core.String])->int"(%"tart.core.Array[tart.core.String]"*

Well, after many months of effort, my LLVM-based garbage collector is finally passing its unit tests. This represents a significant milestone for me in the development of my programming language, Tart. The collector itself is fairly rudimentary - a single-generation, copying collector. It does not yet support multi-threaded programs, but in practice there's no serious obstacle to supporting

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I

On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: > After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to work. I'm now able to actually single-step through my program and set breakpoints, and examine function parameters. > > However, I'm also seeing a lot of new problems which

On Nov 8, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: > >> After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to work. I'm now

After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to work. I'm now able to actually single-step through my program and set breakpoints, and examine function parameters. However, I'm also seeing a lot of new problems which weren't exposed before. After spending the better part of two

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: > > After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's > conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to > work. I'm now able to actually single-step through my program and set > breakpoints,

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Nov 8, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Devang Patel < <dpatel at apple.com> >> dpatel at apple.com> wrote:

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Talin wrote: >> >> I've been trying to track down the problem with the DWARF info that is >> being emitted by my front end, which has been broken for

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 8, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Devang Patel < <dpatel at apple.com> > dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: >> >> After to speaking to Devang

I'm playing around with different combinations of LTO passes, and I've run into a strange problem: I have a 'main' function that looks like this: define i32 @"main(tart.core.Array[tart.core.String])->int"(%"tart.core.Array[tart.core.String]"* %args) { entry: call void @llvm.dbg.func.start(metadata !0) call void @llvm.dbg.stoppoint(i32 2, i32 19, metadata

On Sep 30, 2009, at 12:06 AM, Talin wrote: > I'm playing around with different combinations of LTO passes, and > I've run into a strange problem: > > I have a 'main' function that looks like this: > > define i32 @"main(tart.core.Array[tart.core.String])- > >int"(%"tart.core.Array[tart.core.String]"* %args) { > entry: > call

Hi Talin, I think that the framework for GC assumes llvm.gcroot to be in the first block. If it is not the case in your example, it will break these assumptions. Nicolas On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm working on the code to handle GC tracing of "intermediate values" (as > described in the GC doc), and I've run into a