similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared"

2009 Aug 03
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
Hello >   The fix is very simple: the defaulting of this macro to 0 in > gcc/config/arm/arm.h, present in 2.2 has been omitted in 2.5. > > The attached patch puts the defaulting clause back, the same as it was in 2.2 This is known problem which was fixed after 2.5 release. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State
2009 Aug 03
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
Thanks. Do you have fixes for the other ARM bloopers? This is the forthcoming Debian version and it's now dying on arm-gnueabi when it links cc2-dummy saying libbackend.a(arm.o): In function `current_file_function_operand': /home/martin/arm/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5/build-gcc/gcc/../../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:3506: undefined reference to `ENCODED_SHORT_CALL_ATTR_P'
2009 Aug 03
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
Hello, Martin > Thanks. Do you have fixes for the other ARM bloopers? This is the > forthcoming Debian version and it's now dying on arm-gnueabi when it > links cc2-dummy saying Please use the current Top-of-the-Tree version. I was successfully built cross llvm-gcc for arm-elf / arm-gnu-linux-eabi target triples. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and
2009 Aug 04
3
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
On 8/3/09, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Thanks. Do you have fixes for the other ARM bloopers? This is the > > forthcoming Debian version and it's now dying on arm-gnueabi when it > > links cc1-dummy saying > > Please use the current Top-of-the-Tree version. Sorry, that's not an option as I'm trying to fix the Debian
2009 Aug 21
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
On Aug 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> On Aug 4, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> >>> Hello, Martin >>> >>>> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, >>>> powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: >>>>
2009 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > On Aug 4, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > >> Hello, Martin >> >>> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, >>> powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=llvm-gcc-4.2;dist=unstable >>> so it
2009 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
Hello, Martin > llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, > powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=llvm-gcc-4.2;dist=unstable > so it looks like the 2.5 release was never properly tested before it > was published. Unfortunately, ia64 and sparc were never considered as a 'tier-1' targets
2009 Aug 19
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
On Aug 4, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Martin > >> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, >> powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=llvm-gcc-4.2;dist=unstable >> so it looks like the 2.5 release was never properly tested before it >> was published.
2004 Oct 04
1
[LLVMdev] cfrontend-1.3.source: Compilation error
This is a forward of a question from the SourceForge LLVM forum. If anyone has experience with Cygwin and building the C front-end there, please reply and CC Alex. --- Post by Alex Vinokur below --- =============== Windows 2000 GNU gcc 3.3.3 (cygwin special) =============== ./configure ./make I have got compilation error ------------------------------- make[1]: Entering directory
2006 Dec 22
5
[LLVMdev] in Cygwin problems
How to solve this problem? $ make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty' make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty' make[1]: Entering directory
2006 Sep 09
1
[LLVMdev] gfortran: link error building gfortran on linux
Hi, in trying to build an llvm-gfortran on linux from today's gcc4 SVN, I get the following link errors that didn't show up on OS X. This is also using LLVM CVS from this morning. They appear to mostly be related to CodeWarrior compatibility code, but a couple are less obvious. What's the best way to fix this? I'm stuck without my powerbook for at least three weeks and I'd
2007 May 14
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling llvm-gcc in linux/ppc
Hi everyone, I am using linux/ppc and after porting llvm's jit for this architecture, I am currently trying to compile llvm-gcc on it. I have gcc 4.1.1 and use llvm-gcc from cvs. Compilation fails and the message is: gcc -O2 -DIN_GCC -DDEFAULT_TARGET_MACHINE=\"powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu\" -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long
2008 Jul 30
3
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc fortran bootstrap broken
On x86-64 linux, in stage 2, I get: c++ -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o f951 \ fortran/arith.o fortran/array.o fortran/bbt.o fortran/check.o fortran/data.o fortran/decl.o
2010 May 20
0
[LLVMdev] trying to build llvm-gcc for arm, error: 'V1DI_pointer_node' undeclared (first use in this function)
You need to configure with --enable-llvm. (It would still be nice if V1DI_pointer_node was defined; I'll take a look at that.) On May 20, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Anatoly Yakovenko wrote: > i am getting this compilation error: > > > gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall > -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic >
2006 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] Build failure..
Hi, After a svn/cvs update I get the following errors when building the frontend. Anyone that sees the same ? http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/apple/trunk/gcc/expr.h /* APPLE LOCAL begin radar 4441049 */ extern tree objc_v2_component_ref_field_offset (tree exp); extern tree objc_v2_bitfield_ivar_bitpos (tree exp); /* APPLE LOCAL end radar 4441049 */ mentions APPLE, is it only working on
2007 Sep 10
6
Marketing stuff
Hello, I took the liberty of quickly slamming together http://www.theora.org/benefits/ . This is supposed to answer the "why should you use Theora" question in some detail. This section is not yet included in the navigation bar and I'd like to get confirmation that this information can be considered "canon" before making it "visible" (oh, and of course someone
2008 Aug 11
5
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
The curent llvm svn (r54623) is unable to link the gfortran compiler in llvm-gcc-4.2 svn. I am getting the error... c++ -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -mdynamic-no-pic -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o f951 \
2008 Aug 11
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
Hi Jack, > The curent llvm svn (r54623) is unable to link the gfortran > compiler in llvm-gcc-4.2 svn. I am getting the error... ... > Undefined symbols: > "_create_init_utf16_var", referenced from: > _darwin_build_constant_cfstring in libbackend.a(darwin.o) this is probably due to recent Apple changes. Fortran builds on linux. > Why is c++ being used
2008 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc fortran bootstrap broken
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 18:13:27 Duncan Sands wrote: > On x86-64 linux, in stage 2, I get: > > c++ -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o f951 \ > fortran/arith.o
2010 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] trying to build llvm-gcc for arm, error: 'V1DI_pointer_node' undeclared (first use in this function)
i am getting this compilation error: gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source/gcc -I../../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source/gcc/.