similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.6 Branched

John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > I have finished updating the DSA and Poolalloc source code so that it > compiles with the LLVM 2.6 API. If you check out the LLVM 2.6 branch > (directions are in the llvmdev archives; look for the email by Tanya > Lattner about the LLVM 2.6 branch), you should be able to build mainline > DSA and Pool Allocation against it. > > If you

Please create a similar branch for Klee; I've been working on porting that to 2.7 as well.<br /> <br /> Best, Erich Ocean<br /> <br /> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Criswell (criswell@uiuc.edu) wrote:<br /> > <br /> > Dear SAFECoders and LLVMers,<br /> > <br /> > There is some new work on moving DSA to the new LLVM 2.7 API.

John Criswell wrote: > John Criswell wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> I have finished updating the DSA and Poolalloc source code so that it >> compiles with the LLVM 2.6 API. If you check out the LLVM 2.6 branch >> (directions are in the llvmdev archives; look for the email by Tanya >> Lattner about the LLVM 2.6 branch), you should be able to build mainline

On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Just a reminder that today is the last day for pre-release2 testing. > Hi Tanya, Attached are the log files for Mac OS X 10.5.8 on PowerPC. There are these failures for clang: ******************** Failing Tests (20): /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/ always_inline.c

Dear SAFECoders and LLVMers, There is some new work on moving DSA to the new LLVM 2.7 API. I am hoping to do something similar for SAFECode once the code freeze occurs. To keep things running smoothly, there are now release_26 branches for the poolalloc and safecode projects. If you are using SAFECode, Poolalloc, or DSA with LLVM 2.6, you will want to switch to these branches. To get

Just a reminder that today is the last day for pre-release2 testing. Thanks, Tanya

Tanya Lattner wrote: > There is no 2.3 release of poolalloc. This is a research project at > UIUC and they do not do releases of it. We have not done scheduled releases of the poolalloc source code. In the past, we have merely kept the SVN version updated with LLVM mainline (more or less). If you want to use DSA or poolalloc, I recommend that you update to the upcoming LLVM 2.6 release

> On Monday 02 February 2009 13:20, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> Just a reminder, I'll be re-creating the 2.5 branch tonight at 9pm PST. > > What does re-creating mean? Why can't the previously-created 2.5 branch > simply be updated? It means deleting the branch and creating a new one. > I ask because svn history will look a little wierd and it makes it harder for

Dear All, I have finished updating the DSA and Poolalloc source code so that it compiles with the LLVM 2.6 API. If you check out the LLVM 2.6 branch (directions are in the llvmdev archives; look for the email by Tanya Lattner about the LLVM 2.6 branch), you should be able to build mainline DSA and Pool Allocation against it. If you have trouble building DSA/Pool Allocation, please email

On Aug 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> On Aug 4, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> >>> Hello, Martin >>> >>>> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 is failing to build from source on arm, sparc, >>>> powerpc and ia64, only succeeding on i386 and amd64: >>>>

On Mar 6, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Patrick Sathyanathan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in using the "Data Structure Analysis" that is apparently in the "poolalloc" module according to the documentation on alias analysis in LLVM. I have downloaded and built LLVM 2.6 on MinGW but the sources do not seem to include anything related to pool allocation. I don't think

The 2. 7 release branch is created. If you want to check it out, you can issue the following commands: svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_27 svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4.2/branches/release_27 svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_27 svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_27 The pre-release

2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> 2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: >>> >>> On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: >>> >>>>> To test clang: >>>>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. >>>> >>>> LLVM

Just a reminder, I'll be re-creating the 2.5 branch tonight at 9pm PST. -Tanya

Hi Tanya, glad to see that 2.6 release is coming. :) After doing some testing with valgrind on this release, I have find a little "undefined memory" error in DefaultJITMemoryManager related to the PoisonMemory field. This bug has been corrected in trunk with revision r80192. Attached is a patch which cleanly apply same correction on the release-2.6 branch. Thanks, Olivier. On Sat,

I expect llvm.org to need another 30 minutes of downtime. Thank you for your patience. Thanks, Tanya On Apr 25, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > Just a reminder that llvm.org will be rebooted in 15 minutes, and will be down for about 30 minutes or less. It will be rebooted a couple times so you might see it come up and go back down, but do not get

llvm.org is now down. I will notify you when it is back up. This will take several hours. -Tanya On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > Just a reminder, LLVM.org will be going down in 1 hour. > > Thank you, > Tanya > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> To be clear: >>

Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community. > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ > > You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of > both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be > fixed in pre-release2, so please search the bug database before filing > a new bug. > >

The deadline is today! However, I've decided to give all the procrastinators a couple extra days. You have until Wednesday 9/19 at 9:00PM PDT. Thanks, Tanya On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Just a reminder that we are still accepting proposals!. > > The deadline is less than 2 weeks away, so please send your proposals in as soon as possible. > > Thank

On Monday 02 February 2009 13:20, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > Just a reminder, I'll be re-creating the 2.5 branch tonight at 9pm PST. What does re-creating mean? Why can't the previously-created 2.5 branch simply be updated? I ask because svn history will look a little wierd and it makes it harder for third parties to track revisions and do merges.