similar to: [LLVMdev] llc undefined symbol

On Aug 11, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Michael Graumann wrote: > I'm writing a pass for the llc tool. If I try to load my pass(llc - > load ../mypass.so), this error message appears : > > Error opening '/nfs/wsi/ti/graumann/llvm-2.5/Release/lib/ > LLVMMicha.so': /nfs/wsi/ti/graumann/llvm-2.5/Release/lib/ > LLVMMicha.so: undefined symbol: >

Hi At the moment there are in my pass only this virtual function (runOnMachineFunction). maybe is there an other reason? Thank you Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag von Mike Stump Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. August 2009 19:16 An: LLVM Developers Mailing List Betreff: Re: [LLVMdev] llc undefined symbol On

Welcome to the world of pluggable machine passes. This work was done to lighten the load of some llvm tools, ie., only link in the register allocators and instruction schedulers that are actually needed in a particular circumstance. I guess I will have to write this up, but generally it works like this. In your register allocator .cpp file add the following include; #include

Hi! I'm developing a register allocator and need it to be available as an option for llc tool. I used to edit /lib/CodeGen/Passes.cpp for this aim but after yesterday's update these options are defined somewhere else and I can't find the place. Thanks for your help. Tony. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

>From: Johannes Graumann <johannes_graumann at web.de> >Date: 2007/12/18 Tue PM 04:40:37 CST >To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch >Subject: [R] All anchored series from a vector? lapply(1:length(myvector) function(.length) { c(myvector[1}:myvector[.length]) }) but test it because i didn't. >Hi all, > >What may be a smart, efficient way to get the following result:

Hi, both versions are working: FunctionType *asm_Ftype = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); InlineAsm* Iasm = InlineAsm::get(asm_Ftype,"isync","~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}",true); How can I insert this InlineAsm, because it is no instruction and this way it will not work: Instruction *pi = bi;

Hello. Will, thanks a lot for pointing me to the MaskedGatherSDNode and mgatherv4i32. I have to say that the definition of the "multiclass avx512_gather" from lib/Target/X86/X86InstrAVX512.td is difficult to follow and I prefer not to use it. I currently have some serious problems with TableGen - it gives an assertion failure:

Hello, I'm learning about robust M-estimators right now and had settled on the "Huber Proposal 2" as implemented in MASS, but further reading made clear, that at least 2 further weighting functions (Hampel, Tukey bisquare) exist. In a post from B.D. Ripley going back to 1999 I found the following quote: >> 2) Would huber() give me results that are similar (i.e., close

Hello. I wanted to inform that I fixed the bug from the previous email. The main reason for the bug was that I thought that the SDNode masked_gather is returning only 1 value, but it returns 2 (hence, I guess, the earlier reported, difficult to follow, error: "Assertion `New->getNumTypes() == 1"). masked_gather returns 2 values because: // SDTypeProfile -

Hello. I fixed the bug reported in the previous post on this thread (<<llvm::MemSDNode::MemSDNode(unsigned int, unsigned int, const llvm::DebugLoc&, llvm::SDVTList, llvm::EVT, llvm::MachineMemOperand*): Assertion `memvt.getStoreSize() <= MMO->getSize() && "Size mismatch!"' failed.>>) The problem with this strange error reported comes from

Thank you Chris, for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asm_arguments, false); Alternatively FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); . Can you give me a snippet of example code, or somebody else?

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Michael Graumann<MichaelGraumann at gmx.net> wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to modify the llc in that way: > > > >         subf 3, 5, 3                                 subf 3, 5, 3 > >         stw 3, 44(1)                                stw 3, 44(1) > >                                                                # InlineAsm

Ok :-) und how can I add inlined assembly to the output? - Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag von Bill Wendling Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 19:16 An: LLVM Developers Mailing List Betreff: Re: [LLVMdev] modifying llc asm output On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Michael Graumann<MichaelGraumann

On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Thank you Chris, > for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions > > asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, > asm_arguments, false); > > Alternatively > > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, >

Hello, As prompted by B. Ripley (see below), I am transfering this over from R-User ... For a package I am writing a function that looks like test <- function(Argument1=NA){ # Prerequisite testing if(!(is.na(Argument1))){ if(!(is.character(Argument1))){ stop("Wrong class.") } } # Function Body cat("Hello World\n") } Documentation of this is straight forward:

On Jul 31, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Hi, > I’ am trying to insert an InlineAsm Instruction in my pass, which > FunctionType do I need for Inlineasm? > If I understand it right, I need a call instruction to insert the > new produced InlineAsm? > > Thanks for help Inline asm works like a "callee". So for: call void asm sideeffect

Hi, Is there such a thing? If no: is it easily simulated? thanks, Joh

Hi all! I didn't manage to link my regalloc to lli (I added USEDLIBS to its makefile). Without it I can't run tests cause they need lli to be built. So how can I link createMyRegisterAllocator function to lli? Thanks. On 8/22/06, Anton Vayvod <avayvod at gmail.com> wrote: > > I managed to link my RegAlloc.a library to llc tool but can;t make the > same with lli tool.

Hi, Is there any way to get an expression into a data.frame, such that "grid.table" from "gridExtra" will plot it evaluated in the table body? The docu does it for the header, but is the body possible? Thanks, Joh

Why is class(spectrum[["Ion"]]) after this "factor"? spectrum <- cbind(spectrum,Ion=rep("", nrow(spectrum)),Deviation.AMU=rep(0.0, nrow(spectrum))) slowly going crazy ... Joh