similar to: [LLVMdev] Initial cut at a instruction raising patch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Initial cut at a instruction raising patch"

2009 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Initial cut at a instruction raising patch
On Aug 8, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: > Hi, > > This patch raises selected instructions to function calls. I've dome > some preliminary testing and I works: Out of curiosity, why do you want this? -Chris > > ; ModuleID = 'raise.o' > target datalayout = "e-p:32:32-i1:8:0-i8:8:0-i16:16:0-i32:32:0- >
2009 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Initial cut at a instruction raising patch
Chris Lattner wrote: > On Aug 8, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This patch raises selected instructions to function calls. I've dome >> some preliminary testing and I works: > > Out of curiosity, why do you want this? > I do bitcode linking of a whole program, including the soft-float and other support routines that a
2009 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Initial cut at a instruction raising patch
On Aug 8, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Aug 8, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch raises selected instructions to function calls. I've dome >>> some preliminary testing and I works: >> >> Out of curiosity, why do you want this? >> > > I
2005 Nov 07
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
Tanya Lattner wrote: > > Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed > though (see previous email). I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my $PATH. Can you verify that the configure script works for you without the --with-f2c option?
2005 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, John Criswell wrote: > Tanya Lattner wrote: >> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed >> though (see previous email). > > I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've > tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my > $PATH. > > Can you
2005 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
>> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed >> though (see previous email). > > I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've > tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my > $PATH. I get the error with and without the --with-f2c option. I never used the NAG Fotran
2009 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Initial cut at a instruction raising patch
On Aug 8, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Richard Pennington wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> How do you plan to handle things like arbitrary precision integers, >> etc? It seems like you'll end up duplicating a ton of codegen logic >> to handle this. > > Maybe I'm not being very clear. I want this replacement to be done at > the very last minute (before unreferenced
2009 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Initial cut at a instruction raising patch
Chris Lattner wrote: > How do you plan to handle things like arbitrary precision integers, > etc? It seems like you'll end up duplicating a ton of codegen logic > to handle this. Maybe I'm not being very clear. I want this replacement to be done at the very last minute (before unreferenced functions are removed, of course). I only want to catch libgcc-ish functions. For
2012 Aug 02
2
metafor- interpretation of moderators test for raw proportions
Hello metafor users, I'm using metafor to perform a single-effect summary estimate of the raw proportion of patients experiencing a post-operative complication, and I'm interested in seeing if this proportion differs between the three most commonly used surgical techniques. The software is working as expected, but I would like to double check on the interpretation of my mixed-effect model
2003 Nov 19
1
fritz pci / chan_capi / australia setup
Hi * Fans, I have some fritz cards now, followed instructions from stuart hirsts email of Jun 28: -> Thanks for your info but I think I have it working at last. Below are the steps I took which might help others. 1) Download the PCI AVM drivers from ftp://ftp.avm.de/cardware 2) Download the Chan_capi from http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/ 3) tar -xvzf fcpci-suse8.0-03.09.10.tar.gz which
2012 Jul 20
4
Voicemail Emails
Has anyone been able to make an html template for the voicemail emails. We would love to customize them beyond just plain text. We have dome some Google searches and have not been able to come up with much. I believe that Switchvox has customized the voicemail email into html. Has anyone ever tried this? Thanks, /Josh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment
2010 Jan 27
3
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4
The ll file: ; ModuleID = 't.bc' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f80:128:128-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32-n8:16:32" target triple = "i686-pc-win32" @.str = private constant [13 x i8] c"hello world\0A\00" ; <[13 x i8]*> [#uses=1] define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv)
2005 May 26
5
SIP Soft Video phone for Asterisk usage
I am looking for a SIP Soft Video phone, which I can use with Asterisk. If you have one installed (regardless if free or purchased) please tell me which one, the settings in Asterisk and your experience with it. bye Ronald
2010 Jan 26
2
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4
Hi, I've generated a .bc file for a simple program using the clang front end, the human readable output of llvm-dis looks good. Running llc on the bc file generates an assembly file (.s using either att or intel syntax). Now, when I try to generate an executable with gcc (3.4.4 cygwin) I get lot's of errors: $ gcc t.S t.S: Assembler messages: t.S:4: Error: no such instruction: `align
2000 Jan 04
0
Stepwise logistic discrimination - II
I apologise for writing again about the problem with using stepAIC + multinom, but I think the reason why I had it in the first place is perhaps there may be a bug in either stepAIC or multinom. Just to repeat the problem, I have 126 variables and 99 cases. I don't know if the large number of variables could be the problem. Of couse the reason for doing a stepwise method is to reduce this
2010 Jan 26
0
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4
On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:31 AM, herz wrote: > Hi, > > I've generated a .bc file for a simple program using the clang front > end, the human readable output of llvm-dis looks good. > Running llc on the bc file generates an assembly file (.s using either > att or intel syntax). > Now, when I try to generate an executable with gcc (3.4.4 cygwin) I > get > lot's of
2004 Aug 23
2
VoicePluse DID problem
Hey guys, Cal someone help me. I'm register voiceplus DID i try to config fllow example but not work. When i test call to number and debug iax2 in my asterisk not found packet. My iax.conf -------- register => in-xxx:yyy@gw5.voicepulse.com [voicepulse] context = voicepulse-incoming secret=yyy auth=md5 type=friend host=gw5.voicepulse.com ------ extention.conf ---- [voicepulse-incoming]
2009 Feb 02
2
Ticket #282: omindex-assorted-enhancements.patch woes
I would really like to try out the features in the patch above. But I can't ever seem to get the resulting omindex.cc to "make". I tried updating to rev 10801 from the SVN then run /bootstrap but then I seem to get errors compiling everything when I try and do "make" (I'm using ubuntu 8.10). So I thought I'd try an apply the patch to the latest stable version
2010 Jan 27
0
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4
Anton, This is a because the "windows" x86 target defaults to intel syntax asm. I'm not even sure what the "windows" subtarget is if not for mingw or cygwin. Does it make sense to remove the "Windows" target and have "i686-pc-win32" just be a synonym for mingw? -Chris On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:32 AM, herz wrote: > The ll file: > > ; ModuleID
2005 May 26
1
VIDEO ON 1.0.7 stable
--- listas iPfone <listas@ipfone.com.br> wrote: > Hi all > > I need to know if the video support for h.263 is > active in version stable > 1.0.7 to use with eyeBeam in asterisk it works for me... [2222] type=friend secret=xxxx auth=md5 callerid="myCallerId" <2222> canreinvite=no host=dynamic disallow=all context=default allow=alaw allow=ulaw allow=speex