Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] java program to read bitcode file"
2009 Aug 07
0
[LLVMdev] looking for a stack machine backend
Hi,
I am looking for a stack machine backend using clang/llvm as frontend.
Best regards
Luc Peuvrier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090807/c796883e/attachment.html>
2016 May 24
2
Eclipse (Java) locking issues after upgrade (3.6.23 -> 4.4.3)
Hello Jeremy,
Sorry for the long delay for responding to your request (just came back
to the office after long Victoria day weekend).
I'm not sure if it's Ok to send such large attachements to the list.
So here's a Dropbox public link to download it:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/o2617jtqfbwlyhc/eclipse-java-samba-level10.log.gz?dl=0
All our connections to this share are not all
2016 May 30
1
Eclipse (Java) locking issues after upgrade (3.6.23 -> 4.4.3)
Hello Jeremy,
Could you send me some references to the ‘cross-protocol issue’ (Bugzilla, documentation, etc)?
I’ll disable the ‘kernel oplocks’ and see what happens.
We’re getting all sorts of weirdness from our Mac SMB clients since we upgraded to Samba v4.4.3.
In particular, when we open a session with an OSX (Yosemite) client with SMB autommount directories, we see multiple SMBD processes
2016 May 20
2
Eclipse (Java) locking issues after upgrade (3.6.23 -> 4.4.3)
Hello,
We seem to not be able to use Eclipse with a network drive since we
upgraded our Samba server to version 4.4.3.
Here's the error we get:
mac-mini:MacOS user$ ./eclipse
java.lang.RuntimeException: Error initializing storage.
at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.framework.EquinoxContainer.<init>(EquinoxContainer.java:68)
at
2016 May 20
0
Eclipse (Java) locking issues after upgrade (3.6.23 -> 4.4.3)
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:01:20PM -0400, Luc Lalonde wrote:
> Caused
> by: java.io.IOException: An error occurred while locking file
> "/home/user/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_4.6.0_1664049636_macosx_cocoa_x86_64/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/.manager/.fileTableLock":
> "Operation not supported". A common reason is that the file system or
> Runtime
2016 May 27
0
Eclipse (Java) locking issues after upgrade (3.6.23 -> 4.4.3)
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:41:32PM -0400, Luc Lalonde wrote:
> Hello Jeremy,
>
> Sorry for the long delay for responding to your request (just came
> back to the office after long Victoria day weekend).
>
> I'm not sure if it's Ok to send such large attachements to the list.
> So here's a Dropbox public link to download it:
>
>
2009 Aug 07
1
mounting volumes : pammount vs gvfs
Hi list.
First sorry for my poor english, so not easy for me to explain exactly
my problem.
My problem is that files/ directories created in my mounted volumes
don't have the rights I expect.
Here is my smb.conf :
[...]
[Docs]
comment = Docs
path = /home/Docs
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
force group = docs
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force create
2020 Jan 09
0
mean
Jean-Luc,
Please keep the communications on the list, for the benefit of others, now and in the future, via the list archive. I am adding r-devel back here.
I can't speak to the rationale in some of these cases. As I noted, it may be (is likely) due to differing authors over time, and there may have been relevant use cases at the time that the code was written, resulting in the various
2015 Mar 24
1
Samba server with NFSV4/kerberos
Hello Luc,
thanks for your answer. If I understand you correctly than you are using
samba4 as windows domaincontroller and you do not have another Windows
DC? So after all you have exactly one Kerberos Server that is part of
the samba4 server?
Thanks
Rainer
Am 24.03.2015 um 12:41 schrieb Luc Lalonde:
> Guten tag Rainer,
>
> We use our Samba4/Win2k8 AD domain to authenticate all our
2020 Jan 09
1
mean
I think median() behaves as designed: As long as the argument can be ordered, the "middle observation" makes sense, except when the middle falls between two categories, and you can't define and average of the two candidates for a median.
The "sick man" would seem to be var(). Notice that it is also inconsistent with cov():
>
2017 Apr 28
0
Unable to add a particular member to group (Samba 4.6.3)
Hello Rowland,
Is this what you mean?
[root at roquefort ~]# echo $LANG
fr_CA.utf8
Cheers, Luc.
Le 2017-04-28 à 10:04, Rowland Penny a écrit :
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:41:31 -0400
> Luc Lalonde <Luc.Lalonde at polymtl.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hello Rowland,
>>
>> Have you tried deleting a user, re-creating the same user and then
>> try to add him to a group?
2013 Mar 26
1
Samba 4 LDAP NTLM password nightly injection
Hello Andrew,
I'm finally diving into this project...
First off, my sysadmin stuff is mostly in Perl. So my Python is rudimentary at best.
Here we go anyway... I've looked at the 'upgrade.py' but I can't seem to figure out how to connect to the Samba4 passwd database.
In the script I see these lines:
#######################################################
# Connect to
2018 Feb 05
0
Using Samba AD for NFSV4 Kerberos servers and clients
I found one of my problems was that on the client, in the /etc/krb5.conf
file, the domain name was in lower case. The one on the server was upper
case. Upper case'ing the client one fixed my nfs4 mount issue, but now I
have another one.
The nfs4 krb5 export mounts on the remote client, but doesn't seem to
recognize permissions. The mount directory is shown as owned by root and
the
2005 Oct 10
1
Re: Bug#332939: nut-usb: Needs an udev rule for udev >= 0.070-3
salut Jean-Luc,
2005/10/9, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) <jean-luc.coulon@wanadoo.fr>:
>
> Package: nut-usb
> Version: 2.0.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> The latest version of udev: 0.070-3 conficts with hotplug.
> This means that while the new udev includes the hotplug functionalities,
> the rules in /etc/hotplug/usb/libhidups and /etc/hotplug/usb/libhid.usermap
2016 Sep 19
0
Windows 10 anniversary update (1607) causing profile sync errors
Hello,
Strangely, the profile sync error is gone now on that machine.
But just to be safe, we're rejecting the 1607 updates with our WSUS.
It will give me more time to investigate the problem. We'll probably
sticking with 1511 in our teaching labs until summer 2017.
Sorry I can't help more...
Cheers, Luc.
Le 2016-09-19 16:30, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba a écrit :
> On
2017 Apr 28
0
Unable to add a particular member to group (Samba 4.6.3)
Haha! They're called accents ;-) And no, the username has none. We
stick to strict ASCII usernames.
And I don't agree, the english accent is implicit. Just ask an
american or someone in the UK to pronounce the same word ;-)
Le 2017-04-28 à 11:31, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit :
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:01:14 -0400
> Luc Lalonde <Luc.Lalonde at polymtl.ca> wrote:
2019 Jul 29
2
Samba 4.11.0RC1 replication with Windows2012R2 ?
The first sentence says that default schema has changed from 2008R2
(schema 47) to 2012R2 (schema 69).
This does not mean that we're now at Windows 2012R2 functional level by
default??? I must be missing something...
On 2019-07-29 11:29 a.m., Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 15:59, Luc Lalonde via samba wrote:
>> Hello Folks,
>>
>> There seems to be
2016 Sep 01
2
Dsync config help
I was able to workaround the ?Error: sync: /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb: Configured passdbs don?t support credentials lookups (to see if user is proxied, because doveadm_port is set)? problem:?
=> I simply disabled ?doveadm_port? and added the port number at the end of the remote URL in ?mail_replica?
Replication seems to work although I have regular errors (idk if they are related to each
2017 Apr 28
0
Unable to add a particular member to group (Samba 4.6.3)
Hello Rowland,
Have you tried deleting a user, re-creating the same user and then try
to add him to a group?
I'm convinced that this will point us in the right direction to correct
the bug.
Thanks!
Le 2017-04-26 à 14:25, Luc Lalonde a écrit :
> Still doesn't work for that user... for works for another user:
>
> [root at roquefort samba]# cp -av
>
2019 Jul 29
2
Samba 4.11.0RC1 replication with Windows2012R2 ?
Ahh ok, thanks for the clarification!?? I'll go to bed less ignorant
tonight ;-)
On 2019-07-29 12:07 p.m., Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 16:41, Luc Lalonde wrote:
>> The first sentence says that default schema has changed from 2008R2
>> (schema 47) to 2012R2 (schema 69).
>>
>> This does not mean that we're now at Windows 2012R2 functional level