similar to: [LLVMdev] Dominator error inserting instructions into BasicBlock

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > On 2017-Apr-04, at 12:12, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 3, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: >>

Hi all, I updated the patches to remove the native object wrapper format. As suggested we will work on getting the ThinLTO framework in place using bitcode first, and then work on adding the native object support. As noted in this RFC and in the associated patch D11722, for now I have empty ThinLTO blocks with no records, since I wanted to get feedback on the overall block design first. The RFC

Hi all, I have a question regarding populating ValueSymbolTable of a Function. Is it that ValueSymbolTable is populated automatically whenever an alloca instruction is created using IRBuilder or do we need to explicitly populate?? If we need to populate explicitly, the insert method in ValueSymbolTable is private, so how can we do it? Currently, I am trying to access the symbol table as below:

Nick Lewycky wrote: > > > > It's maintained by LLVM for you, by Value::setName and other methods. > > Nick > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > I am getting the following error when trying to

> I am getting the following error when trying to fetch the symbol table using > getValueSymbolTable() Why do you want to do this? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

subramanyam wrote: > > Hi all, > I have a question regarding populating ValueSymbolTable of a Function. > Is it that ValueSymbolTable is populated automatically whenever an alloca > instruction is created using IRBuilder or do we need to explicitly > populate?? It's maintained by LLVM for you, by Value::setName and other methods. Nick

Hello, This patch adds rollback support for the converter, the converter can roll back a conversion if the image file haven't been modified. In addition, I rearrange some codes in convert.c and add a few comments. Regards YZ --- diff -r 12138d4beeb0 convert.c --- a/convert.c Fri Jan 04 11:29:55 2008 -0500 +++ b/convert.c Mon Jan 07 23:35:25 2008 +0800 @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include

This is being offered gratis till the end of december by Mackie. This one might just be coaxed into running under Wine which would be quite an achievement. Kudos: 1. The program, though free, needs be registered to a "machine number". Did this under Windows, did not get that far using Wine. Might need a second copy just for the Linux runs. 2. The program searches for all its own

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > Hi, > > As part of PR27551 I want to add a string table to the bitcode format to > allow global value and comdat names to be shared with the proposed symbol > table (and, as side effects, allow comdat

I have just discovered the existence of Wine as I was thinking of creating a Windows partition in order to process audio files using some of the great VST fx plugins (such as dblue glitch) that are only available on Windows. I could then import the files into Logic 9 on Mac OSX Lion for use in my music. A Windows partition seemed the only solution until I stumbled across the Wine website: I tried

Hello, I'm using llvm 2.5. I initially built it with GCC 4.1.2 and it completed building. But when I run it with a simple test function, it fails with the following issue: Value still in symbol table! Type = 'i32' Name = 'a' Value still in symbol table! Type = 'i32' Name = 'b' llc: ValueSymbolTable.cpp:29: llvm::ValueSymbolTable::~ValueSymbolTable():

Adding llvm-dev as that might be a more suitable audience for this discussion. (& I know Lang's been playing around with the same problem in the Orc JIT, so adding him too) Is there any basis/reason to believe that the .X suffix is a better, more principled one than straight X? Is that documented somewhere as a thing the demangling tools will ignore? On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:06 PM,

Do the buildbots only build debug components? I am seeing lots of this on trunk with release-style builds: [x86_64-off-opt]: Failed with signal(SIGABRT) at line 1 [x86_64-off-opt]: while running: llvm-as < /ptmp/dag/llvm- project.official/llvm/tags/RELEASE_25/test/Transforms/TailDup/basictest2.ll | opt -tailduplicate -disable-output [x86_64-off-opt]: Value still in symbol table! Type =

I am new to Wine and I am new to Ubuntu 11.10. I am unable to find the following menu: Wine -> All Programs

Hi all, accSone is proud to announce the release of the cross platform internet jam solution tubePlug 2.0 as open source on GitHub under GNU General Public License v3. tubePlug is based on opus 1.0.3. <https://github.com/accSone/tubePlug>https://github.com/accSone/tubePlug We are happy to support if one need help to understand the code or want to discuss new features or projects. The

Hi, I just registered. I have a problem related to wine: lmms can run some vst plugins with VeSTige, so I tried to get ez drummer working. It didn't work, so I downloaded Toontrack Solo, that is a program needed to run ez drummer as a standalone, and not as a plugin. It still wouldn't work, neither as a standalone. I made a few searches and I found out that it needed mfc42.dll so I

hi, I posted about a week ago, when i had updated to wine1.2-rc6. I had warned that i had seen regressions in wine. This applied to Commercial VST instruments that i have been using in linux for about 2 years. At first, when using Jack-audio-connection kit (after the upgrade) i began to notice certain plugins were now causing Xruns, when they started up. this never used to happen. so i posted.

Hi, As part of PR27551 I want to add a string table to the bitcode format to allow global value and comdat names to be shared with the proposed symbol table (and, as side effects, allow comdat names to be shared with value names, make bitcode files more compressible and make bitcode easier to parse). The format of the string table would be a top-level block containing a blob containing

Hi all, I just walked across an interesting situation in Module::getOrInsertFunction(Name, Type) in the LLVM C API. In my particular case: One of the first things we do is add a global variable named foo which is a [ 100 x i64 ]. Later we add a function void foo(...) unfortunately, when we do the getOrInsertFunction we get back void (...) * bitcast ([100 x i64]* @foo_ to void (...)*)

Anton Korobeynikov-2 wrote: > >> I am getting the following error when trying to fetch the symbol table >> using >> getValueSymbolTable() > Why do you want to do this? > > > > I want to access some of the variables created in the function. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Using-ValueSymbolTable...-tp29461430p29469794.html Sent from