similar to: [LLVMdev] BuildBot contribution for Open Solaris

<span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; ">Hello LLVM devs,<br /> <br /> I would like to contribute an x86 64-bit OpenSolaris 2009.06 buildbot to the project, at least for LLVM but Clang would be great too if that's possible. If someone would provide me with a password and

<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: monospace; font-size: medium; ">Hello LLVM devs,<br /> <br /> I would like to contribute an x86 64-bit OpenSolaris 2009.06 buildbot to the project, at least for LLVM but Clang would be great too if that's possible. If someone would provide me with a password and the necessary configuration, I'll get

Chetan, the below error is the same than on Solaris Intel: buildbot startup script needs to have PATH set so that it can find the various needed binaries (svn, make, compiler, ...) you may simply want to copy the intel one to the sparc... I'm away from work and back on Jan. 3rd, so up to you to fix it. cheers, Arnaud 2011/12/21 <clepple+buildbot at ghz.cc> > The Buildbot has

Hi everyone, I am working with Alexei Starovoitov to contribute an LLVM buildbot for the experimental BPF backend. I am following the steps at [1] to setup a buildbot and I was mostly successful: I was able to setup a slave and a temporary master to check its base config. Now I'm not sure about the next step: patching the "slaves.py" and "builders.py" files in zorg. * Is

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:04 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > We're thinking about running our own buildbot against the upstream llvm > and clang sources. I'm talking to our build folks and seeing what they > can allow. Maybe we can contribute some build slaves to the osuosl > buildbot but I'm not sure. > > If we do end up having to run our own buildbot,

Hello Marco, Welcome aboard! slaves.py keeps the build slaves definitions, builders.py keeps the builders definitions. You have to have both. The steps of adding a new slave is here: http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html. Please make sure you done the step # 10 before bringing your slave up, otherwise it wouldn't be authorized by the master and will be blacklisted after multiple

Hello LLVMers, I'd really appreciate it if interested parties could contribute some machine power to run the public buildbot. In particular, we could really use at least one of the following: 1. A fast Windows machine. 2. A fast Linux i386 machine (two, ideally). 3. Another fast Linux x86_64 machine (currently there is no Linux llvm-gcc x86_64 self hosting build, for example). If you,

Galina, thanks again for your help. I have cooked a new patch that should make a bit more sense. I have added the new builder under _get_experimental_scheduled_builders(), as the comment above that function suggested me it would be a good idea. :) Does it look a reasonable start? Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies,

On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:47 PM, John Thurston wrote: > I'm running Solaris 10 on a dozen SPARC boxes. I'd like to explore NUT for use with our snmp UPS, but I'm unable to complete the configure/make/install process. > > Can anyone share a how-to for solaris? Here's some general NUT-on-Solaris information: http://people.cs.clemson.edu/~gdowdin/work/ch06.html Can't

Thank you. Alexei just committed the change to SVN. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM. > Please commit. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:32 PM,

We're thinking about running our own buildbot against the upstream llvm and clang sources. I'm talking to our build folks and seeing what they can allow. Maybe we can contribute some build slaves to the osuosl buildbot but I'm not sure. If we do end up having to run our own buildbot, what's the best way to integrate that into the upstream web page and status notifier? Basically,

Hi, I am new to Icecast open source project and I would like to contribute into this open source project. Looking for some kind of guidelines how to get started and where to browse for the open issues or features to look into. Any kind of help would be much appreciated. - Sourav Saha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, This is to let you know that a new buildbot for Windows native LLVM/Clang testing is established: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7 . Hardware + OS configuration is: Haswell desktop with Windows 7 + Visual Studio 2013 Update 4. It is hosted by Intel and hopefully will contribute to improve quality of the LLVM/Clang on Windows being developed in the LLVM community.

I agree, it is great. I have some regression tests (check-all) failures on Windows locally. Does the buildbot show the same? On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > That's great to hear! > > 2015-04-23 12:08 GMT+03:00 Fedorova, Vera <vera.fedorova at intel.com>: > >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> This is

Hi, Sorry if this is a dumb question but i can''t seem to find an anwser anything close to what i am trying to figure out... I have a dual boot machine with 3 disks - 2 x 1TB mirror OpenSolaris with ZFS root pool 1x 250GB Solaris 10 with ZFS root pool This is a development\testing\home file server machine only. My question is tho, since I can boot into either OpenSolaris or Solaris

Good evening, On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 17:19 +0530, Sourav Saha wrote: > Hi, > > > I am new to Icecast open source project and I would like to contribute > into this open source project. Looking for some kind of guidelines how > to get started and where to browse for the open issues or features to > look into. We're always happy to see when people are interested to help.

David, I like your patch. I applied the feedback in Phabricator and tested internally. Is it your intent to contribute the patch? I could commit the revised version on your behalf? > On Aug 14, 2014, at 2:41 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > I've put the diff in Phabricator here: > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D4901 > > If you think

There are two unexpected failures in the check-all (this check-all runs with self-build-clang): Failing Tests (2): Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/clang-tidy-diff.cpp Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/file-filter.cpp Last log: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/340/steps/ninja%20check%202/logs/stdio From: Yaron Keren [mailto:yaron.keren at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April

I''m wondering if Open Solaris + xVM will allow me to do the following: I currently have 2 Solaris 10 servers sucking down electrons that I would like to consolidate into 2 xVM instances on a Solaris 11 quad core box. This is what it looks like: Internet --->A sol 10 FW/Web B>---->C Sol 10 app/mail D---> local LAN So interface A is connected to the Internet. The FW/Web box

On 7/1/2013 2:55 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:47 PM, John Thurston wrote: > >> I'm running Solaris 10 on a dozen SPARC boxes. I'd like to explore NUT for use with our snmp UPS, but I'm unable to complete the configure/make/install process. >> >> Can anyone share a how-to for solaris? > > Here's some general NUT-on-Solaris