Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1700 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] LLVM JIT vs Interpreter memory foot print"
2009 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM JIT vs Interpreter memory foot print
can you post the simple but long running program?
On Jul 29, 2009, at 2:20 PM, jg2 wrote:
>
> I want to compare the memory footprint of LLVM JIT vs the
> Interpreter on
> Darwin.
> I am currently doing this by running lli, on a simple but long running
> program, with and without the "-force-interpreter option", and then
> I look
> at the Real Memory used by
2008 Mar 25
5
Wine on Windows 7
For some time now I have been researching the upcoming Windows 7, scheduled for release in 2009 - 2010.
Recently, a number of websites have stated that Microsoft is no longer including backwards compatibility with software from previous versions of Windows. From the number of sites, I'm guessing this is not just a rumor. And considering the almost infinitely massive list of Windows programs
2006 Oct 14
2
Wiki ControlPanels page
Hello,
My name is Travis Northrup. I would like to contribute documentation on
CentOS compatible control panels. I have 12 years technical experience and
have used most if not all control panels currently available, free and
commercial. The main control panels that I can immediately begin documenting
are Virtuozzo, OpenVZ, cPanel, Plesk, DirectAdmin, Webmin. Others I can
begin documenting as I go
2006 Oct 20
2
Documentation Content
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head><title></title>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css">
<style type="text/css"><!--
body {
margin: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
2009 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc build of inferno/plan 9 'mk' fails
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:03 PM, james
northrup<northrup.james at gmail.com> wrote:
> CC="p llvm-gcc-4.2 `llvm-config --cflags` -march=i386 --emit-llvm -O0
> -c -I$PLAT/include -I$ROOT/include -I$ROOT/utils/ include"
> LD="p llvm-ld `llvm-config --ldflags --libs all `"
> AR="p llvm-ar crvs"
Using llvm-ar+llvm-ld is likely to give you bad
2009 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc build of inferno/plan 9 'mk' fails
hello,
I'm attempting to build the inferno source tree using either of native
LTO or jit'd bins and having no obvious luck.
im using macports (current as of this email) llvm-2.5 and llvm-gcc on
a macbook pro (x86)
following the inferno directions verbatim will use 'cc' as the
compiler and just works.
the build tools are different from the naive build tools as follows:
2008 Sep 18
0
USB Foot Pedals
Hi all,
I'm running ubuntu 8.04 and Wine 1.0. I am trying to get VEC foot pedals (http://www.nch.com.au/hardware/pedals.html - first one on list) to work with Express Scribe transcription from NCH (http://www.nch.com.au/software/linux.html). When I download the native linux version of the software, the USB pedals work fine but the application is unable to play wav files. Contacted NCH who
2009 Jul 20
1
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Aaron
Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2009/7/16 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Aaron
>> Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > 2009/7/16 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
>> >> Whats Daniels approach, does he have any
2012 Apr 01
19
cross-subvolume cp --reflink
Glück Auf!
I know its been discussed more then ones, but as a user I really would like to see the patch for allowing this in the kernel.
Some users tested this patch successfully for weeks or months in 2 or 3 kernel versions since then, true?
I''d say by creating a snapshot, it''s nothing else in the end. More then one file or tree sharing the same data on disc, or am I wrong?
2009 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
2009/7/16 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
>
>> I understand that you say that, but I can't bring myself to care at this
>> point. Have you thought about how many cycles are already used to produce
>> the instructions that lead to the emission of those 10K bytes? The total
>> percentage of
2009 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
2009/7/16 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Aaron
> Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 2009/7/16 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
> >> Whats Daniels approach, does he have any online documentation or code,
> do
> >> you have an email address so I may talk to him.
> >>
>
2009 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
On Jul 16, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
> I understand that you say that, but I can't bring myself to care at
> this point. Have you thought about how many cycles are already used
> to produce the instructions that lead to the emission of those 10K
> bytes? The total percentage of time spent doing these virtual calls
> will be tiny compared to the total
2009 Jun 26
1
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM on an embedded device
Hi Evan,
Sorry for the delayed reply. We've compiled llvm on Linux with only the x86 target, which produced an lli executable that's about 5.5MB. The LLVMX86CodeGen.o alone is 1.7MB. We've configured with
--disable-assertions --enable-optimized --enable-targets=x86 --disable-debug-runtime --enable-bindings=none --disable-ltdl-install --disable-shared --enable-static
Are there any
2009 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
2009/7/16 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> The basic idea of using templates inconjunction with inlining is for
> efficiency.
>
> 6,500 virtual calls outputting bytes out of 10000 calls, and the rest 1,750
> being words to output 10,000 of code does not entice me to use virtual
>
2009 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Aaron
Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2009/7/16 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
>> Whats Daniels approach, does he have any online documentation or code, do
>> you have an email address so I may talk to him.
>>
>> Take a look at how asmprinters work
>> in include/llvm/Target/TargetRegistry.h .
2009 Jul 16
3
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
On Jul 16, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Chris,
>
> The basic idea of using templates inconjunction with inlining is for
> efficiency.
>
> 6,500 virtual calls outputting bytes out of 10000 calls, and the
> rest 1,750 being words to output 10,000 of code does not entice me
> to use virtual calls.
I understand that you say that, but I can't bring myself
2018 Oct 03
0
At the foot o'our Christ. Taxation is the ft. Microsoft. The pillars of "first" the IRS and ... "render to Caesart."
<http://alome.ga/lists/lt.php?id=YUgFAABSXE9RUlQdU1wDX1cNVg>
... from the eya of Re
I've been writing nearly non-stop for a period of years, spurts of email
campaigns and walking on the streets singing ... imagine that .... that
have created a large reader base
<http://alome.ga/lists/lt.php?id=YUgFAwRUVU9RUlQdU1wDX1cNVg>
(bric ks, b re ady
2013 Oct 29
1
Package size NOTE in R CMD check
How does one "fix" this:
R CMD check --as-cran --timings igraph_0.6.5.999-54.tar.gz
...
* checking installed package size ... NOTE
installed size is 5.9Mb
sub-directories of 1Mb or more:
libs 4.0Mb
...
Are maintainers expected to break up the package in this case?
I can see that the NOTE is useful to avoid garbage in the package, but
since the libs directory is created
2013 May 05
10
Possible to dedpulicate read-only snapshots for space-efficient backups
Hey list,
I wonder if it is possible to deduplicate read-only snapshots.
Background:
I''m using an bash/rsync script[1] to backup my whole system on a nightly
basis to an attached USB3 drive into a scratch area, then take a snapshot of
this area. I''d like to have these snapshots immutable, so they should be
read-only.
Since rsync won''t discover moved files but
2016 May 09
2
Removing pointers from MCInstrDesc for less relocations
Hi everybody,
I noticed today that my libLLVM-3.9svn.so has a ~1.7MB .data.rel.ro
segment - i.e. data that needs to be touched by the dynamic linker even
though it's ultimately read-only, and data that cannot be shared between
multiple processes using LLVM.
It turns out that a solid ~1.3MB of that data is in the tablegen'd
MCInstrDesc tables - there a pointers for ImplicitUses,