similar to: [LLVMdev] PIC16TargetAsmInfo::getBSSSectionForGlobal

Substituting the uses of a global with an absolute address would make all accesses to that global through pointer, which is very inefficient on PIC16. So we don't change the code generation for that global; instead we only pass the address information to the linker (home made linker) through some assembly directives. What are you trying to do? Are you trying to change the logic of this part or

On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote: > Substituting the uses of a global with an absolute address would make > all accesses to that global through pointer, which is very inefficient > on PIC16. So we don't change the code generation for that global; > instead we only pass the address information to the linker (home made > linker) through some

> My short term goal is to make TargetAsmInfo not depend on libvmcore. > This means that no methods in it should take GlobalValue*'s for > example. There is a suite of GV classification methods that need to > be moved somewhere else, probably in TargetLowering or asmprinter. One > method in particular (SectionForGlobal) is virtual and only re- > implemented for

Here you go: http://www.cornwarning.com/xfer/jccolor.o (from the jpeg library...) jccolor.o: Mach header magic cputype cpusubtype caps filetype ncmds sizeofcmds flags MH_MAGIC_64 X86_64 ALL 0x00 OBJECT 4 432 SUBSECTIONS_VIA_SYMBOLS Load command 0 cmd LC_SEGMENT_64 cmdsize 312 segname vmaddr 0x0000000000000000 vmsize 0x0000000000000900

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Ed Maste via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > One additional use case for you: converting from a binary to an ELF object > file > ``` > objcopy -I binary -O elf64-x86-64 foo.bin foo.o > ``` > This is sometimes used for embedding binary files for use by drivers and > such. > Yea, unfortunately the command-line you

Hi Kent, My guess is you are getting some new bit of info in your object files and your ranlib(1) is older and doesn't know about it. If you can send me the .o file or the output of otool(1) with the -hlv options on your object file I can take a look. Kev P.S. you can find out the version of ranlib(1) you have by running strings(1) on it and grep(1)'ing for the string

Ran into this today -- rebuilt the SVN Trunk for this morning of LLVM+CLANG. Now every time my builds try and make a library from .o files, ranlib complains about 'malformed object' files. This is with OS X 10.7.4, and the binary tools from XCode 4.4.1 ld -v @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-127.2 llvm version 3.0svn, from Apple Clang 3.0 (build 211.12) ranlib doesn't tell you what

We don't currently apply any relocations (that I know of) for debug info in LLDB. > On Jun 2, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote: > > I think I'm getting closer. The debug_info section is being relocated correctly (I think): > > 0x00000000: Compile Unit: length = 0x00000045 version = 0x0003 abbr_offset = 0x00000000 addr_size =

Fantastic! Thanks for all of the input! I'll be considering all of it going forward. The plan right now is just to worry about ELF executables and nothing else. I'm very sympathetic to the "llvm-objtool" change. If everyone is cool with it I'll change the name in the next CL to "llvm-objtool". To start out I implemented a very basic ELF64LE specific bit of code.

I know i'm new to the list but i'd like to propose something for tincd daemon. I'd like to mark all sockets established by a tincd process with a mark passed as an argument in the command line. What could be the purpose of this new option? The goal of this option is to be able to have several tincd process running at the same time using the same port but using different ip. In

Hello list I use a samba (version 3.0.14) PDC and Cups (1.2.7) for sharing printers with windows clients. When I create a new printer in Cups i have to wait a long time (abour 20 minutes) to see the printer in Samba's sharing Here is my Print sectin of the smb.conf [printers] path = /tmp print ok = yes browseable = yes printable = yes printer admin = @users, root [print$] path =

Hello list, I'm wondering about the feasibility of collapsing the following two globals within llvm-link: @"OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_2" = private global %struct.objc_class* bitcast (%struct._class_t* @"OBJC_CLASS_$_NSString" to %struct.objc_class*), section "__DATA, __objc_classrefs, regular, no_dead_strip", align 4 @"OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_8"

Hi All, I was wondering if someone could help illuminate me… I took a very simple objective-c file, "simple" and started looking at various sections… Finally I did… $otool -X -s __DATA __objc_selrefs simple 00003034 00002fec 00002fe7 00002fd7 00002fcc 00003044 00002fc6 00002ff2 $ otool -l simple | grep selrefs -A20 sectname __objc_selrefs segname __DATA addr 0x00003034

I didn't get to work on this more last week, but I'll look at incorporating that suggestion. The other question of course is how to do this in LLDB. Right, now what I'm doing is going through and adjusting the load address of every leaf in the section tree. That basically works and gets me backtraces with the correct function names and the ability to set breakpoints at functions in

I am again calling for help from LLVM developers ;) For my DSP backend, at the lowering stage and also at the AsmPrinter stage, I need to know if a GlobalAddress is a code or a data address. So I tried at the lowering stage to use: GlobalAddressSDNode *GSDN = cast<GlobalAddressSDNode>(Op); const GlobalValue *GV = GSDN->getGlobal(); GV->hasSection() and GV->getSection() But the

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > OK. I see that the Mach-O linker is not even built when LLD is enabled in > Release_40, only the PE/COFF and ELF linkers are built. > > From looking at reviews it appears that Clang was able to be linked with > LLD on Darwin about 2 years ago, so Mach-O support seems to have

I reply to myself... I didn't go in the right direction in my previous email. There is an easy way to tell if a GlobalValue corresponds to data or code: const GlobalValue *GV; if(Function::classof(GV)) ... // process the global value as a function else ... // process the global value as data Damien On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Damien Vincent <damien.llvm at

On 3/21/11 2:00 PM, Damien Vincent wrote: > I reply to myself... I didn't go in the right direction in my previous > email. > > There is an easy way to tell if a GlobalValue corresponds to data or code: > const GlobalValue *GV; > if(Function::classof(GV)) > ... // process the global value as a function > else > ... // process the global value as data > >

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:54 PM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Problem > ------- > > Instrumentation for PGO and frontend-based coverage places a large amount > of > data in object files, even though the majority of this data is not needed > at > run-time. All the data is needlessly duplicated while generating archives, > and > again while

Hi, When I’m compiling a code with –fvisibility=hidden –fPIC for ARM, I find that LLVM generates less optimized code than GCC. For example: test.cpp: void init(void *); int g0[100]; int g1[100]; int g2[100]; void foo() { init(&g0); init(&g1); init(&g2); } Clang will emit 1 GOT entry for each GV and 2 instructions to get the address: ldr