similar to: [LLVMdev] Web Server Restart

Dear All, The LLVM web/SVN server isn't responding, so I'm going to restart it at 11:50 am CST (in about 10 minutes). Hopefully it'll just be a clean restart of the Apache process. -- John T.

Dear LLVMers, I'll be restarting the LLVM web server in about 15 minutes (3:30 pm Central Time). It's a small web server configuration change, so it'll be a quick restart. For paranoia's sake, please refrain from doing SVN commits starting at 3:30. I'll email once the web server is back online. -- John T.

Dear All, I will be restarting the LLVM web server at 5:00 pacific time (7 pm Central time). I need to turn on includes for one of the virtual hosts. -- John T.

John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > I will be restarting the LLVM web server at 5:00 pacific time (7 pm > Central time). I need to turn on includes for one of the virtual hosts. > Please remember that the LLVM SVN server is part of the web servers, so please don't commit files until I let you know that the web server is back up. -- John T. > -- John T. > >

Dear All, I'll be restarting the LLVM web server in 15 minutes (i.e., at 10 am Central Time). During the restart, all web and SVN services will be unavailable. Please don't commit to the SVN repository while the server is down. I'm adding a new virtual host configuration, so the restart should cause only momentary loss of service. I'll send email once services are back up.

Dear All, The web server on llvm.org seems to have started going really slowly. I'm going to restart it in 5 minutes (10:50 am CDT) to see if that fixes the problem. -- John T.

Dear LLVMers, I will be restarting the LLVM website tomorrow at 2:00 pm Central Standard Time. I will be adding a new virtual host. Unless something unexpected happens, there should be no noticeable downtime. However, I ask that people refrain from using the LLVM website or SVN services between 2:00 pm and 2:10 pm CST so that I don't interrupt any commits. I will send email to llvmdev

Dear All, I will be restarting the LLVM web server in 10 minutes. Please refrain from using SVN at that time. Regards, John Criswell

FYI, Yesterday's Slashdot had an article about Linux compiler benchmarks from Coyote Gulch (Scott Ladd). In this update he compares GCC and ICC. You can read the article here: http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/linux_compilers/ Of particular note was his use of SciMark 2.0 which is a NIST developed benchmark for scientific computing. Its available in both java and C and computes a MFLOPS

Hi all, I got curious about something, so in proper scientific fashion I obtained some data and analyzed it. Question: what is the female participation in the R-help email list? Data: the most recent list postings, obtained from the website. I took my best shot at classifying the names given in the email header as male/female, but ended with a fair number of unknowns. This dataset had 2797

After fighting with trying to rebuiled my src.rpm file. I decided to use a plain old fashion compile from the tar files. which worked ok, no settings changed. at about 11pm last night I finished and noticed a few things that made me a bit uneasy. 1) all the Samba bin files were installed in /usr/local/samba/.. 2) no smb.conf file was created. I used ./configure, make , make install when I

Hi list, this probably isn't a completely libvirt-specific question but I'll try anyway. Please ignore if it is too much off-topic. On an Ubuntu (9.10) virtualisation host, running KVM and libvirt and several guests (Debian, Ubuntu, Windows Server 2003) in a bridged network fashion [1,2] I noticed that performing /etc/init.d/networking restart on the host completely cuts off all

Hi! Just udated my Fedora dovecot to version 2.2.36 and found that after the update dovecot will fail all LDAP logins after slapd has been restarted during the logrotate. Restarting dovecot fixes the problem. Is there a bug preventing dovecot to reopen the LDAP session when it fails? Best Dag

Dear All, Some of you may have noticed that our SSL certificate expired about half an hour ago. We have a new SSL certificate, but we haven't had time to install it. I am going to attempt to install the new certificate. This will necessitate one server restart if I am successful and probably two if I'm not. Chances are that you will not notice any disruption, but if you're the

Reid Spencer wrote: > FYI, > > Yesterday's Slashdot had an article about Linux compiler benchmarks from > Coyote Gulch (Scott Ladd). In this update he compares GCC and ICC. You > can read the article here: > http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/linux_compilers/ > > Of particular note was his use of SciMark 2.0 which is a NIST developed > benchmark for scientific

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, John Criswell wrote: > >> The LLVM web server is up and running, but we're still working on some >> subversion configuration issues. The server may go up and down >> intermittently as we try configuration changes over the next half hour. >> > > Apparently someone clobbered

John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Some of you may have noticed that our SSL certificate expired about half > an hour ago. We have a new SSL certificate, but we haven't had time to > install it. > > I am going to attempt to install the new certificate. This will > necessitate one server restart if I am successful and probably two if > I'm not. > >

Please watch the addresses that you are responding to when mailing the list. There continue to be replies to Harald Reindl on the list. Please note that Reindl is not a subscriber to the list (and for good reason - thank you, list admins) so any mail you get from him purporting to be from the list is bogus; he sends mail to you Cc'd to the list (or vice- versa) just to get his 2-cents back

Dear All, The LLVM web server is up and running, but we're still working on some subversion configuration issues. The server may go up and down intermittently as we try configuration changes over the next half hour. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- John T.

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, John Criswell wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, John Criswell wrote: >>> The LLVM web server is up and running, but we're still working on some >>> subversion configuration issues. The server may go up and down >>> intermittently as we try configuration changes over the next half hour. >>> >> >>