similar to: [LLVMdev] CVS binutils includes support for plugins, can use the llvm plugin.

That's pretty awesome! Will ar, etc. eventually get some autodiscovery of plugins so that things work OOTB after a make install of llvm/llvm-gcc? - Daniel On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Rafael Espindola<espindola at google.com> wrote: > For some time now the gold linker has support for plugins and llvm has > a plugin for it. > > Unfortunately, it was still not possible

2009/7/12 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>: > That's pretty awesome! Thanks! > Will ar, etc. eventually get some autodiscovery of plugins so that > things work OOTB after a make install of llvm/llvm-gcc? The bfd library (used by ar and nm) already searches for plugins in $install_dir/lib/bfd-plugins/. Maybe we could pass an option to llvm's configure to tell it where

On May 26, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Rafael Espindola wrote: > Today support for plugins has been committed to BFD. That is the file > format abstraction library used by binutils. This now works Very nice Rafael! Can you please update the web page to mention this, e.g. in the LinkTimeOptimization.html document and wherever else relevant? -Chris > > $ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -O2 -c a.c

Yes,it's indeedly the correct one,and new ld can also support -plugin option,I don't know the reason of the trouble, 2009/9/17 Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com> > > llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin a.a b.o -o hello > > > > which is similar with the example in the document,it tells me that > > libLLVMgold.so can not be found ,but I truly put it in the

Hi,all I'm using ubuntu8.04 and I'm installing gold-plugin along with the document of that, After I built the binutils and LLVM with plugin enabling,and I also replace ld with ld-new which supports plugin,I tried to compile a hello world program by this: llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin a.a b.o -o hello which is similar with the example in the document,it tells me that libLLVMgold.so can not

> llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin a.a b.o -o hello > > which is similar with the example in the document,it tells me that > libLLVMgold.so can not be found ,but I truly put it in the directory > which is the same as the cc1's. > > What's the problem with my libLLVMgold.so's position? That looks correct. Can you check that *) It is the correct cc1 :-) (run llvm-gcc with

2009/9/17 Nan Zhu <zhunansjtu at gmail.com>: > Yes,it's indeedly the correct one,and new ld can also support -plugin > option,I don't know the reason of the trouble, Does ld actually work if you pass libLLVMGold.so to it? Try to link with llvm-gcc without the -use-gold-plugin option and with -v (it will fail as expected). Copy the collect2 line and add the -plugin line. If

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Rafael Espindola<espindola at google.com> wrote: > 2009/7/12 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>: >> Will ar, etc. eventually get some autodiscovery of plugins so that >> things work OOTB after a make install of llvm/llvm-gcc? > > The bfd library (used by ar and nm) already searches for plugins in >

My nightly tester on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed to bootstrap llvm-gcc today: Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! ./build/read-rtl.o differs The updates since the last bootstrap (24 hours before): went from revision 53904 to revision 53950. Ciao, Duncan.

Hello, I am trying to bootstrap on ARM linux EABI using a qemu chroot to better test my changes on at least one more architecture. I am using the following configure line: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/espindola/install/ --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-languages=c --disable-shared --disable-multilib --enable-llvm=/home/espindola/build --enable-checking arm-linux-gnueabi The bootstrap fails

2008/7/23 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>: > My nightly tester on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed > to bootstrap llvm-gcc today: > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > Bootstrap comparison failure! > ./build/read-rtl.o differs I am having the same problem. It was "introduced" by revision 54811, so it looks like a memory corruption problem. Investigating. > The

> I encountered the same error and the nice people from the llvm > irc-channel suggested the attached patch. It enables compiling llvm-gcc > for me, but i have not yet done any further testing and i also have no > idea if this is the right way to fix the problem. Nice. I will give it a try. I was trying to reduce a test case, but it is a bit hard. I have a cpp that crashes cc1plus,

On 27/07/07, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > Code generator shouldn't introspect the LLVM type at all, except to > get the size of the type. Anything needed should be encoded by the > front-end. In the short term, please focus on getting parity with > what we already have. This means x86-64 will be wrong, but it > already is. As a second step we can then

On Jan 20, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-01-20 08:01, Bill Wendling wrote: >> I'll need some more information than this. I don't have a Linux box, >> so I can't tell. Do you have a .i file? How is autoconf being >> confused? What does config.log say about it? >> >> > I've seen this failure on my nightly builder too (SVN r62521),

In order to the code generators to lower functions arguments that have the "byval" attribute, they would have to access the original argument Type. For example, on linux x86_64 {i64, i64} should be passed on registers and {i64, i64, i64} goes on the stack. The problem is that when looking at (for example) FORMAL_ARGUMENTS, the only thing that is present is the type of the pointer itself

Hi, I am new to LLVM and have been trying to get it working on scratchbox (ARM target). When I try to build llvm-2.1, the build freezes with the following output.. /scratchbox/compilers/arm-softfloat-linux-gcc-3.4.4-cs-2005q3-2-glibc-2.3.6/bin/sbox-arm-softfloat-linux-gnu-nm: 'libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx_s.o': No such file mv -f libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx.visT libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx.vis

On 2009-01-20 08:01, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Jan 19, 2009, at 5:34 PM, John Regehr wrote: > > >> Since yesterday I've been getting the error below when building llvm- >> gcc >> on Ubuntu Hardy on x86. For some reason, several instances of >> autoconf >> are getting confused and failing to detect a stdlib.h. >> >> John >>

Dear All, Currently the load of llvm.org is too high. This influences the whole project services like buildbots, bugzilla, etc. It was found that this workload is possible caused by massive mirroring of LLVM SVN repository into git/hg/whatever. Please don't do that :) 1. Usually one don't need full history, this makes the mirroring much easier and faster (do you *really* need r5000? I

> I propose that structures that are passed on registers should be slip > into many DAG level arguments (for now this would be all structs) and > the DAG should contain copies instead of loads. The nice thing about > this proposal is that for structures that are passed on the stack, the > DAG doesn't need to know the size. All that we need to add to add to > the DAG is a flag

Rafael, Remember that the qemu <= 0.9.0 can misexecute code compiled by LLVM. I think you should test using qemu CVS. Lauro 2007/11/2, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com>: > Hello, > > I am trying to bootstrap on ARM linux EABI using a qemu chroot to > better test my changes on at least one more architecture. > > I am using the following configure line: >