similar to: [LLVMdev] Interpreter Destructor

On Jul 1, 2009, at 8:28 AM, David Bertouille wrote: > Would it not be better to clear the Functions > map in the Interpreter desctructor since it data in it may no longer > be > valid? Probably. Patches welcome! --Owen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2620 bytes Desc: not

Hi, I'm new to LLVM and have some questions about using the JIT on Windows x64. I am aware that this is currently broken but am attempting to use the hack/patch proposed in this bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3739. I checked out the revision the patch was created for (66183) and applied it but the assembler generated seems to fail whenever it reaches a movaps insctruction.

Hi Is there a way of finding out when or whether the wx object referenced in ruby is still alive? Here''s my problem # register that +wx_control+ should update on application events of type +event_type+ def add_subscriber(wx_control, app_event_type) @subscriptions[app_event_type].push(wx_control) end # later def broadcast(app_event) @subscriptions[app_event.type].each { |

Hi, After getting a bug report in Debian [1] about kde-window-decorator crashing in some destructors, I found several other similar reports in Ubuntu [2], KDE [3] (marked as invalid) and also on this mailing list several months ago [4] without any interesting reply. The backtrace is available in all these bugs, especially in [1]. I was about to open a bug at bugzilla.freedesktop.org but first: *

If init doesn't run then disp->outp might not be initialized, resulting in an oops. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/base.c index c41f656abe64..9c38c5e40500 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/base.c +++

Hello, I've recently finished moving a cross-platform project to LLVM 3.0 and now transitioning to 3.1. One of the things I've hit is on OS X, I have linker errors involving JITEventListener and I've noticed if I move the JITEventListener destructor out of JIT.cpp and into JITEventListener.h (like other functions of JITEventListener), the linker is much happier. I'd like to push

Hi all, I'm wondering if there is a way to define a destructor function (to free memory) for S4 class objects in analogy to C++? rm() combined with gc() does not seem to be a good idea (Chambers, 2008). So could it be done on the C/C++ level or is it even already available in the "internals"? Many thanks, David [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

In 2007, user reported a segfault in FLAC::Encoder::File::progress_callback() when called from ~Stream(). Original report at https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/256/ Hello! Sorry, english is not my best language. I use libFLAC++ API. I have some problems. In libFLAC API all OK. Unhandled exception at 0x00000000 in Test.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x00000000. Call stack

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and > several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now > getting a "pure virtual method called" exception (__cxa_pure_virtual) which > I wasn't getting before. This is happening in the destructor of

Hi, To write a "constructor" for an S4 object, you make an initialize method which will be called by new. But how would I make a "destructor" method to be called when the S4 object is garbage collected? I'm looking at reg.finalizer, but I'm not sure how to make that work for an S4 object. I want to write a destructor because my S4 object's initialize method

I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now getting a "pure virtual method called" exception (__cxa_pure_virtual) which I wasn't getting before. This is happening in the destructor of a statically-initialized object. (More precisely, it's blowing up in a BumpPtrAllocator,

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Kamaljit Lall <klall at factset.com> wrote: > I am using the clang API (version 3.1 - trunk 153913) to compile some > very simple code as follows**** > > class MyClass > { > ~MyClass() ; > > }; > > MyClass::~MyClass() > { > > } > > int main() > { > return 0; > } **** > > My problem is that

Following series cleans up a few niggles in the libxl destructor autogeneration. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I am using the clang API (version 3.1 - trunk 153913) to compile some very simple code as follows class MyClass { ~MyClass() ; }; MyClass::~MyClass() { } int main() { return 0; } My problem is that I get the error message: test.cpp:20:10: error: destructor cannot have a return type MyClass::~MyClass() If someone can point me to the right direction that would be great. It compiles fine if

Interestingly, I also get a similar error in a different executable (my unittest): pure virtual method called terminate called without an active exception 0 tartc 0x00000001010a8265 PrintStackTrace(void*) + 53 1 tartc 0x00000001010a88cc SignalHandler(int) + 364 2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff831341ba _sigtramp + 26 3 libSystem.B.dylib 0x7261742e65637365 _sigtramp +

Ok. I figured out. Following methods needs to be called. That fixed the issue. llvm::InitializeNativeTarget(); LLVMInitializeNativeAsmPrinter(); LLVMInitializeNativeAsmParser(); LLVMLinkInMCJIT(); Aaron On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Aaron <acraft at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > When I try to create execution engine I do get "*Interpreter has not been > linked

I am trying to figure out how to free up some memory that seems to be lost when running valgrind under our internal application. The stack traces I get are: ==19966== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 12 ==19966== at 0x402569A: operator new(unsigned int) (vg_replace_malloc.c:255) ==19966== by 0x5D9BBE8: void* llvm::object_creator<llvm::PassRegistry>()

Here is the warning I am getting: PseudoSourceValue.cpp R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk\include\llvm/Support/ManagedStatic.h(23) : warning C4156: deletion of an array expression without using the array form of 'delete'; array form substituted R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk\include\llvm/Support/ManagedStatic.h(72) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void

I believe the correct way is actually include the Interpreter’s header and the rest is handled automatically. Should be similar for MCJIT Zhang > On 11 May 2018, at 05:21, Aaron via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Ok. I figured out. Following methods needs to be called. That fixed the issue. > > llvm::InitializeNativeTarget(); >

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and >> several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now >> getting a "pure virtual method called"