similar to: [LLVMdev] build failure on ARM linux

Nick Lewycky wrote: > I'm seeing this new build failure, starting some time yesterday on ARM: > > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver' > llvm[3]: Linking Debug executable llvmc > g++ -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_1=Base -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_2=Clang -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/include -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE

2009/6/30 Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> > Nick Lewycky wrote: > > I'm seeing this new build failure, starting some time yesterday on ARM: > > > > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver' > > llvm[3]: Linking Debug executable llvmc > > g++ -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_1=Base -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_2=Clang >

Hi all, (Sorry if the answer to this is obvious - and thanks in advance~) Short version: linker error of _backtrace from LLVMSystem.a building a dynamic library embedding LLVM/clang, both against the OSX 10.4 sdk. Long version: I've just tried rebuilding my project using the 2.6 release, using the following commands to try and force LLVM to build against the OSX 10.4 sdk (I am

Hi, For the record, adding UNIVERSAL_SDK_PATH=/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/ was insufficient to restrict the .a/.o files to link against the 10.4 sdk, but env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.4 make did the trick. Thanks! On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 14 janv. 09 à 21:48, Chris Lattner a écrit : > >> >> On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM,

On Oct 25, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote: > Hi all, > > (Sorry if the answer to this is obvious - and thanks in advance~) > > Short version: > linker error of _backtrace from LLVMSystem.a building a dynamic > library embedding LLVM/clang, both against the OSX 10.4 sdk. > > Long version: > I've just tried rebuilding my project using the 2.6 release,

Le 14 janv. 09 à 21:48, Chris Lattner a écrit : > > On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote: > >> Sorry if this is a newb q... I'm developing an application on a >> 10.5 machine but want to target the 10.4 SDK. Is there a magic >> incantation for the llvm configure script to set the sysroot path, >> equivalent to e.g. --with-sysroot

First Thursday in August is this Thursday – will the Bay Area social going to take place that day? From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Marshall Clow Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 5:26 PM To: Nick Lewycky Cc: lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; clang-dev Developers; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bay Area LLVM Social - July On

Initially, tt was not a problem with the verifier, we were just inserting a wrong instruction in our pass. Also we were able to figure out the error you pointed out and our pass is running as intended!!! Thanks a lot. On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Adarsh Yoga wrote: > >> I was able to solve that >> > > What was wrong? I

Prasanth J skrev: > Hi, > > i am a newbie to llvm architecture. i have been trying to port llvm on > ARM target. i am using the following configuration for cross compiling > llvm. > > ../llvm/configure --host=arm-linux --target=arm-linux > --build=i686-linux --prefix=/opt/llvm-arm/ --enable-optimized > --disable-debug \ > --disable-expensive-checks --disable-doxygen

Next bay-area social is this week! Thursday August 9th at St. Stephens Green! Come socialize, try to recruit patch reviewers with beer, or just talk about any subject management hasn't asked you not to. Just like every llvm social! If you wouldn't mind RSVP'ing on http://llvmbayarea.appspot.com , that will help me get us the right sized space at the restaurant. Looking forward to

Adarsh Yoga wrote: > I was able to solve that What was wrong? I wasn't able to reproduce it and would still like to teach the verifier whatever it missed. but still crashing with the same error saying > "Unreachable executed". I have attached the output with this mail. This time you've got: %1 = load i32** getelementptr inbounds ({ i32* }* @structobj, i64 0, i32

Why is his configure not catching this? It tests for the linkability of these functions on the target arch, and should be detecting their absence if that is actually the case. --Owen On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:50 AM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > llvm/lib/System/Atomic.cpp contains the call to > __sync_val_compare_and_swap that lowers to the missing > __sync_val_compare_and_swap_4 GCC

llvm/lib/System/Atomic.cpp contains the call to __sync_val_compare_and_swap that lowers to the missing __sync_val_compare_and_swap_4 GCC intrinsic. The same file contains several other __sync_* calls and all these has to be implemented if we want to be able to compile llvm on linux/ARM with GCC versions below < 4.4 xerxes at labbserver:~/llvm$ grep _sync lib/*/* lib/System/Atomic.cpp:

Currently llvm-dwarfdump isn't very useful on ELF .o files because it doesn't apply relocations. nlewycky at ducttape:~$ llvm-dwarfdump helloworld.o | grep debug_str\\[ 0x0000000c: DW_AT_producer [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x00000000] = "clang version 3.2 (trunk 163034)") 0x00000012: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x00000000] = "clang version 3.2 (trunk

Hi all, with reference to the reply below, I downloaded toolchain from codesourcery (arm-2009q1-203-arm-none-linux-gnueabi) with gcc 4.3.3... when i compile llvm+clang with this toolchain i am getting the following error make[4]: Entering directory `/home/prasanth/LLVM_ARM/llvm-with-armgcc433/llvm-obj/tools/clang/tools/c-index-test' llvm[4]: Linking Release executable c-index-test (without

On 31 July 2012 14:18, Kipping, David <dkipping at qualcomm.com> wrote: > First Thursday in August is this Thursday – will the Bay Area social > going to take place that day? > Tomorrow has a couple conflicts with sports events (a Giants game and an A's game). Thursday the 9th there's another Giants game but nothing else. Let's hold it then. Sorry for the

I was able to solve that but still crashing with the same error saying "Unreachable executed". I have attached the output with this mail. Thanks in advance. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Adarsh Yoga wrote: > >> Yes. Intially the pass was crashing when the module when the module >> verifier was running. I was able to

I wish I was in bay area. :-) 2011/10/5 Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> > Is LLVM IR more than a compiler IR? Have we made progress on moving to git? > And how does the greedy allocator work anyways? > > This month's LLVM social is happening today, at 7pm in a new location! I'm > looking forward to seeing everyone there! > > Nick > > On 28 September

On 6/20/2012 11:55 PM, Ashok Nalkund wrote: > On 6/20/2012 11:00 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote: >> On 06/21/12 12:47 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com >>> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency

On 6/20/2012 11:00 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 06/21/12 12:47 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com >> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote: >> >> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs >> to stay around? Are there developers stuck on