similar to: [LLVMdev] About using ParseCommandLine

I need to use LLVM's command line utilities for parsing command line in an online compiling mode. Since multiple program may be compiled online with same or different command line options, the options states need to be saved and restored. I found it is hard to save and restore opt (options), given that opt are defined with C++ templates, and options are registered implicitly through class

The project SSAPRE is listed in the LLVM website, and the related paper indicated the implementation was almost complete in 2002. Since I do not see the implementation in the current LLVM source base, could anyone provide an update on the status of the project ? Thanks. Xiangyun Kong

Hey Andy > One easy pattern to follow is to register the option during pass initialization with all the convenient flags and parameters, but refer to a globally defined option storage that enforces the singleton and provides visibility. As long as pass initialization happens before parseCommandLine, usage should be consistent. > > Strawman: > > cl::optval<bool> MyOption; //

On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:24 AM, Ahmed Charles wrote: > Sorry, always end up not replying to the list: > > The main issue with dealing with next this way is that people adding new uses of next will probably not be using c++0x and therefore won't know it's ambiguous and that it needs to be qualified. True. But when this code is compiled under C++0X you get an easy to diagnose, easy

Package: xen-utils-3.2-1 Version: 3.2.0-4 Severity: important Tags: patch pygrub uses tools/libfsimage to read a guest filesystem. Unfortunately the grub derived code does not support 256 byte inodes. Grub itself has been patched (see #463236 and #463123) and this patch has now been applied to the upstream Xen tree. See <http://xenbits.xensource.com/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/c777e572a467>

Hy, there! I've recently entered into the swinows-emulating world and it's been quite amusing. I'm now running Kazaa Lite in my Linux box. That's very cool... I'm now trying to install an engineering software called ICEMCFD in my PC. This software is intended for PCs running windoze NT. I'm finding problems while installing this software. Whenever trying to run

The pointer could only be null if the length is zero. If the length is zero, you shouldn't be loading it. Defaulting to null instead of "" is also a microoptimization. -Chris > On Sep 25, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > >> On Sep 25, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

>> > Only "_Z11dummysymbolv" should be there. Here's Doug's explanation of > why this should be so: > > Here's what it *looks* like is happening, and where the FE is probably > getting it wrong. First of all, the constructor in question is defined > outside of the basic_string class template as a non-inline definition: > >

On 2/24/2011 1:21 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Feb 2, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Richard Osborne wrote: >>> The newlib C library provides iprintf(), a restricted version of printf >>> without support for floating-point formatting. I'd like to add an >>> optimization which turns calls to printf() into calls

LLVM's internal command line library needs to evolve. We have an immediate need to build LLVM as a library free of static initializers, but before brute-force fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in place to provide an evolutionary path. In the near term, clients who need llvm-the-library with

On Dec 4, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> >> Only "_Z11dummysymbolv" should be there. Here's Doug's explanation of >> why this should be so: >> >> Here's what it *looks* like is happening, and where the FE is >> probably >> getting it wrong. First of all, the constructor in question is >> defined >>

On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> Here's what I get with TOT compiling with -Os. The orig.ll is what >> I get before r72619. Notice that orig.ll has only one function in >> it. Both the one you sent and duncan.ll have more than one >> function. It's not the fact that more than one function is showing >> up, but

On 25.01.2016 17:04, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > On 25.01.2016 14:13, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> Hi Ole, >> >> Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't >> think that's necessary. > > I have already added a Win10 machine to a domain, where only Win7 > clients were joined before that. I have managed this domain from Win7

> On Sep 25, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Sep 25, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> While porting LLDB over to StringRef, I am continuously running into difficulties caused by the fact that

AUTHORS | 4 MAINTAINERS | 1 doc/Makefile.am | 2 doc/swfdec-docs.sgml | 2 doc/swfdec-sections.txt | 78 +++++++++-- libswfdec/Makefile.am | 3 libswfdec/swfdec.h | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.c | 33 ++++

Hi Ole, Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't think that's necessary. The main benefit you have with the central store is that you now *can edit* GPOs with Win10-only-rules also on non-Win10-computers. It does not, however, affect how the client implements the GPO. Viktor On 25.01.2016 12:36, Ole Traupe wrote: > Viktor, thanks again! > > Now

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:08 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > FWIW, I've performed an experiment with the code below at godbolt. > (used -O2, https://godbolt.org/z/nY95nh) > > ``` > #include <vector> > #include "llvm/Support/Error.h" > > llvm::Expected<std::vector<int>> foo() { > std::vector<int> V; >

Hi all, A little question. How can u use an constructor in controller? I would like to initialize some central stuff before i''m processing the controller. thanks in advance, Martijn

Hi, I can't install a program and I think that the problem is the keyboard. The log file is above. Could anyoune help me? Thanks, Savio Ramos fixme:keyboard:X11DRV_KEYBOARD_DetectLayout Your keyboard layout was not found! Using closest match instead (Brazilian ABNT-2 keyboard layout) for scancode mapping. Please define your layout in windows/x11drv/keyboard.c and submit them to us for

Sorry, always end up not replying to the list: The main issue with dealing with next this way is that people adding new uses of next will probably not be using c++0x and therefore won't know it's ambiguous and that it needs to be qualified. There are also two issues with rvalue references and the STL: 1. EquivalenceClasses, in the insert and findLeader functions, it uses map functions