similar to: [LLVMdev] Internal passes in LLVMC

Thanks Misha, However, I could not find the crosstool. Could you please check the name of the script? Regards, Juan Carlos On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com> wrote: > I have not used llvmc to build ARM binaries, but llvm-gcc does work.There's > a script to build llvm-gcc x86 -> ARM cross-compiler in > llvm/utils/crosstool/ARM/ . >

I am using the below configuration: ./configure --with-llvmgccdir=/home/jcmartin78/LLVM/llvm-gcc4.2 --prefix=/home/jcmartin78/local --enable-optimized=1 --enable-debug-runtime --enable-jit --enable-targets=arm --target=arm When I use LLVMC to compile a simple program I get this: $ llvmc hello.c llc: error auto-selecting target for module 'No available targets are compatible with this

Hello Misha, I used the snapshots for the latest stable version (70786), and I followed the instructions inside of README file (very clear!!!) However, when I ran the hello program, I get an unrecognized option message. Bellow are the details. ============================================ jcmartin78 at jcmartin78-laptop:~/LLVM/my-test$ llvmc hello.c as: unrecognized option '-meabi=4'

I have not used llvmc to build ARM binaries, but llvm-gcc does work.There's a script to build llvm-gcc x86 -> ARM cross-compiler in llvm/utils/crosstool/ARM/ . 2009/6/29 Juan Carlos Martinez Santos <juanc.martinez.santos at gmail.com> > I am using the below configuration: > > ./configure --with-llvmgccdir=/home/jcmartin78/LLVM/llvm-gcc4.2 >

Thanks John, I just realized that I am not working on the same "branch" of LLVM. Looking the latest or the newest version I saw the folder with the script, but I did not see a README file. I ran the script, and I get: ********** chown: cannot access `/usr/local/codesourcery': No such file or directory ********** Therefore my question is if the script depends on others folders (or

Hello, There is an option that I don't know how to used it. *-S* Write output in LLVM intermediate language (instead of bitcode). The option appears in the documentation, but I try to use it... I get the next message: ~/test$ opt -analyze hello.ll -o hello.bc -S opt: Unknown command line argument '-S'. Try: 'opt --help' I also try 'opt --help'; but the option is

Hello, I just install the new newest version of LLVM. When I ran the hello.c example I got the below message. Somebody has an idea what is wrong? The problem is just with lli, the other commands worked as I expected. ********************** :~/LLVM/my-test$ lli hello.bc Tried to execute an unknown external function: i32 (i8*)* puts 0 lli 0x0861fab8 Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: lli

Hello, Following the tutorial for writing a pass, I found the next problem. ***************************** :~/llvm/test$ opt -load ../llvm/Debug/lib/mypass.so -mypass < hello.bc > /dev/null opt: Pass.cpp:151: void<unnamed>::PassRegistrar::RegisterPass(const llvm::PassInfo&): Assertion `Inserted && "Pass registered multiple times!"' failed. Aborted

Hello, Looking the Language Reference, there is something called "addrspace". It can be used to allocate a global variable into a specific area (always that the target supports it). How I can modify the ARM back-end in order to support at least two memory sections for Global Variables in the BSS section. My idea is to split the uninitialized global variables in two sections and to

2009/6/30 Juan Carlos Martinez Santos <juanc.martinez.santos at gmail.com> > Thanks John, > > I just realized that I am not working on the same "branch" of LLVM. Looking > the latest or the newest version I saw the folder with the script, but I did > not see a README file. > > I ran the script, and I get: > > ********** > chown: cannot access

Hello everybody, I am looking for a tool (in Linux or Windows) that allow me to get performance measures like cycle execution, cache accesses, etc. for an x86 architecture. I want to estimate the performance overhead due to the modification that I do using LLVM. Any suggestion is welcome. Thanks in advance, -- Juan Carlos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Jello Juan, The interpreter is quite useless in its current state. Try using a JIT compiler for you computer from the lli command and it should work. --Sam > >From: Juan Carlos Martinez Santos <juanc.martinez.santos at gmail.com> >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:04:17 PM >Subject: [LLVMdev] Problems with lli

llvm/utils/crosstool/ARM/build-install-linux.sh On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Juan Carlos Martinez Santos < juanc.martinez.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Misha, > > However, I could not find the crosstool. Could you please check the name of > the script? > > Regards, > > Juan Carlos > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Juan Carlos Martinez Santos<juanc.martinez.santos at gmail.com> wrote: >  as -meabi=4 -o /tmp/ccYxnIEs.o /tmp/ccy6iYri.s > as: unrecognized option '-meabi=4' [snip] > Any idea what could be wrong? It's probably not finding the right assembler (i.e. using the x86-64 as instead of the arm as). -Eli

Did you try changing the name from Hello to MyHello or something like that? I seem to remember having a similar problem. My tutorial code names the struct MyHello and then registers it as follows: RegisterPass<MyHello> X("myhello", "My Hello World Pass"); You will likely need to change the Makefile as well. Scott On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Juan Carlos Martinez

You mean 'cachegrind'? http://valgrind.org/info/tools.html#cachegrind I don't know any public tool better than this (but someone please tell me if I am misinformed). - Daniel On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Juan Carlos Martinez Santos<juanc.martinez.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am looking for a tool (in Linux or Windows) that allow me to get

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Juan Carlos Martinez Santos<juanc.martinez.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > Looking the Language Reference, there is something called "addrspace". It > can be used to allocate a global variable into a specific area (always that > the target supports it). How I can modify the ARM back-end in order to > support at least two memory sections

wow... Tell me, what cross compiler can I use for ARM if I am working in a i686-Linux machine? At the same time, how I can simulate it? But the way, If I deleted the unknown pseudo-op and change section .rodata definition, I can use my stone age cross compiler. I am just wondering why it works without them. Thanks in advance. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at

Hello all, I am trying to add a new type; however, I found the information in the web site out of date. The modification was: 2008-12-11 12:23:24 -0600. I am interested in the below files: 1. llvm/lib/AsmReader/Lexer.l: add ability to parse in the type from text assembly 2. llvm/lib/AsmReader/llvmAsmParser.y: add a token for that type I could not find them. Could someone tell me what

Hello, Two questions: 1. How I can merge a project with several (.bc) files just in one (.bc) file? 2. Is there a more efficient way to do the below procedure (and get the .bc files)? llvm-gcc -static -O3 -emit-llvm aes.c -c -o aes.bc llvm-gcc -static -O3 -emit-llvm aesxam.c -c -o aesxam.bc llvm-ld aes.bc aesxam.bc -o rijndael_llvm -- Juan Carlos -------------- next part -------------- An