similar to: [LLVMdev] Stack swapping

Hello, while investigating a report from Jan-Piet Mens (resulting in http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/3109), we discovered that NSD (both 3.2.15 and 4.0.0b4) compresses labels in RP content. As far as I can see, this is not allowed by RFC3597 section 4 paragraph 1/2. PowerDNS Recursor, like Unbound and BIND, now deals with this as 3597 section 4 paragraph 4 says we SHOULD. Nevertheless,

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Florian Weimer<fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > Is this really a problem for MLton?  I think you only get less precise > alias analysis, and that's it. Correct. However, I want a fair comparison between LLVM performance and the native x86 codegen. If I don't give LLVM the same information the x86 codegen has, it's an unfair comparison.

Hi, how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are sending queries, be increased? Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several servers all providing DNS services which is reachable under a single IP address known to the clients? Just setting up several name servers and making them known to the clients for the clients to automatically switch isn't

On Sunday 14 June 2009 14:09:33 Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Florian Weimer<fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > > Is this really a problem for MLton?  I think you only get less precise > > alias analysis, and that's it. > > Correct. However, I want a fair comparison between LLVM performance > and the native x86 codegen. If I don't

On 10/18/2016 4:54 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > Unfortunately, we don't have a C-only front-end, nor you can select > some C-only libraries in LLVM to compile C-only code. Such a goal > should have been set from the beginning, and honestly, it would have > made LLVM's code horrendous to work with. An option would be to have a C backend again, and then cross-compile

I'm about to do an overhaul of the DNS service at work and my plan is to use powerdns recursor + dnsdist + keepalived. --- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! On 2019-07-25 14:28, Leroy Tennison wrote: > If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a > master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set > up (I'm

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 13:42, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > > Previous generation languages like OCaml compile this into a completely > generic representation where polymorphism is handled at run-time. > Consequently, even though the polymorphism is buried in the fold function > (not visible at all in our "sum" function) it still incurs massive >

* Wesley W. Terpstra: >> Logically, what you want is a distinct LLVM type for every ML union type >> and each of its constructors.  Unfortunately, LLVM does structural >> uniquing of types, so that won't work. > > Is there absolutely no way to generate a new type? Not even an > 'opaque' one? Is this really a problem for MLton? I think you only get less

If I have a board that supports hot swapping SATA drives, what do I need to have in terms of installed utilities for it to work with CentOS 4? (There's all kinds of information from the board's manual for things like Windows flavors, but nothing on unix, as to always...) -- W | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature.

Every post I do to this mailinglist is followed by a bounce message from "centos.5.warren at recursor.net". I have no clue why this is being send to me, afaics some IP address is being blacklisted but I am not related to it. Am I the only one who gets this and can we remove this person from the mailinglist ? Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > > No worries, thanks for the update. Teresa > > 2048 wasn't enough. Bumped to 4096. Only 1300 ninja targets left. > > Once I've been successful with this, I might try building a

I have been working with Antti Kantee on running scripting languages directly on Xen, and have got LuaJIT running. Essentially this is a build of a modified version of the Xen "Mini-os" which provides a small stub to handle basic Xen functions like memory allocation, combined with NetBSD kernel components to provide networking and file system access if required, plus NetBSD libc to

>On Sunday 14 June 2009 14:09:33 Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Florian Weimer<fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: >> > Is this really a problem for MLton? I think you only get less precise >> > alias analysis, and that's it. >> >> Correct. However, I want a fair comparison between LLVM performance >> and the native x86

Hi All: For whatever reason I can not get dns caching to work on any of my centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig using itself as the resolver the queries fail (See below). Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ed [root at qmail ~]# ps -aux | grep pdns-recursor Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a

Good afternoon! I'm trying to write an LLVM codegen for a Standard ML compiler (MLton). So far things seem to match up quite nicely, but I have hit two sticking points. I'm hoping LLVM experts might know how to handle these two cases better. 1: In ML we have some types that are actually one of several possible types. Expressed in C this might be thought of as a union. The codegen only

Hi Nikolay, I poked at src/lib/virtio/virtq.lua a bit - I was surprised to find no explicit CPU memory barriers in the virtq implementation. These are typically required when using virtio on smp machines - the spec actually mention where barriers are necessary. Are the barriers implicit somehow for lua? I'd be curious to learn. Thanks, -- MST

Hi Nikolay, I poked at src/lib/virtio/virtq.lua a bit - I was surprised to find no explicit CPU memory barriers in the virtq implementation. These are typically required when using virtio on smp machines - the spec actually mention where barriers are necessary. Are the barriers implicit somehow for lua? I'd be curious to learn. Thanks, -- MST

Hi guys, is that a genuine email from the list, I'm getting it rejected as it's missing reverse hostname: May 2 21:21:41 postfix/smtpd[18033]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[194.89.34.45]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [194.89.34.45]; from=<dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> to=<voytek at sbt.net.au> proto=ESMTP

Hi Friends, I have an Excalibur 4GB USB Pen Drive Model Number EXC4. I think it is getting detected by the Centos but I am not sure about the mount point or the device point it is taking /dev/s?? Logs from /var/log/messages. Mar 11 11:30:06 l_l_box kernel: usb 1-1: USB disconnect, address 3 Mar 11 11:30:22 l_l_box kernel: usb 1-1: new high speed USB device using address 4 Mar 11 11:30:22

Hello All (to Ocaml List & CC LLVM list) As some might probably know, the LLVM compiler http://llvm.org/ has (at least in its latest SVN snapshot) a binding for Ocaml. This means that one could code in Ocaml some stuff (eg a JIT-ing compiler) which uses (and links with) LLVM libraries. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-November/011481.html