similar to: [LLVMdev] PIC

Is there any overview or detailed socumentation on LLVM PIC ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090613/8b6b5719/attachment.html>

Anton, Sorry I have not replied earlier. Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF and MachO backends. Thanks, Aaron 2009/6/15 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Hello, Aaron > > > Is there any overview or detailed socumentation on LLVM PIC ? > Did you

Hello, Aaron > Is there any overview or detailed socumentation on LLVM PIC ? Did you mean Position Independent Code? If so - there is nothing special here, LLVM just implements (when this is implemented) what is defined in platform ABI. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Aaron Gray wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > Please try this patch. I tried to copy exactly what libtool would do > on Cygwin by reading the libtool source. > > > Hi Nick, > > Working fine on Cygwin :) Great to hear! I've committed the fix in r65922.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value >> >> of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if >> >> that's

Aaron, > Maybe we should collect references and do some LLVM PIC documentation and > put it on LLVM website ? What you mean as "LLVM PIC documentation"? What should be included there? > Okay. We need documentation, what is the difference between DynamicNoPIC and > full PIC ? >From TargetMachine.cpp (actually this is show in llc --help): cl::values(

Anton, >> Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? > I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. Right. Maybe we should collect references and do some LLVM PIC documentation and put it on LLVM website ? >> I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF >> and MachO backends. > ABI is normally induced

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > > > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > >

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: Please try this patch. I tried to copy exactly what libtool would do on Cygwin by reading the libtool source. Hi Nick, Working fine on Cygwin :) Aaron Nick Aaron Gray wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com <mailto:aaronngray.lists at

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value > >> of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if > >> that's erroneously false. > > This works for me: > > Index: Makefile.rules >

> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Aaron > Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: >> Jon, >> >> LLVM seems to be now dependant by default on OCAML and ocamldoc. Can you >> please change this so OCAML is only built and enabled when an >> '--enable-ocaml' flag is set on 'configure'. As I cannot do 'make >> install'

On 6 March 2010 11:16, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 6 March 2010 10:47, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 6, 2010, at 2:44 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> >> > >> > clang fails with a dynamic linking problem. >> >> What's the problem? and if you would please file a bug that

On 6 March 2010 10:47, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2010, at 2:44 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > > > > clang fails with a dynamic linking problem. > > What's the problem? and if you would please file a bug that would be > awesome :) > > thanks! > > Eric, Neither Cygwin nor MinGW support Dynamic Linking. I am getting

2009/8/28 Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> > 2009/8/28 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > >> Hello, Aaron >> >> > -c /home/ang/svn/llvm-gcc-coff/gcc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/./_popcountsi2.o >> > assertion "V == V2 && "Didn't find key?"" failed: file >> >

On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:17 PMPDT, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Aaron > >> Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? > I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. > >> I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the >> COFF and MachO backends. > ABI is normally induced by platform, not by

On Jul 2, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Aaron >> Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Jon, >>> >>> LLVM seems to be now dependant by default on OCAML and ocamldoc. >>> Can you >>> please change this so OCAML is only built and enabled when an >>>

Hello, Aaron > Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. > I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF and MachO backends. ABI is normally induced by platform, not by architecture or object file format (however they can influence on it). 1. Windows is PIC by design. Google for

2009/8/28 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Hello, Aaron > > > -c /home/ang/svn/llvm-gcc-coff/gcc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/./_popcountsi2.o > > assertion "V == V2 && "Didn't find key?"" failed: file > > "/home/ang/svn/llvm-coff/ > > This is familiar but I cannot remember whether it got fixed or not now. I >

On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have

Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com<mailto:aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com<mailto:dalej at apple.com>> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with