similar to: [LLVMdev] problem when compiling to llvm bitcode

Dear R experts, we are preparing an R-package to compute the Oja Median which contains some C++ code in which random numbers are needed. To generate the random numbers we use the following Mersenne-Twister implementation: // MersenneTwister.h // Mersenne Twister random number generator -- a C++ class MTRand // Based on code by Makoto Matsumoto, Takuji Nishimura, and Shawn Cokus // Richard J.

Hi there, I am trying to interface c++ code in R and make a package. With R CMD SHLIB the dll was created, but when I try R CMD check, I am getting 'undefined reference to..' linkage error messages. The relevant c++ source from conf-infomap.cpp: #include "conf-infomap.h" #include "R.h" // R functions #include "Rinternals.h" #include "Rmath.h" //

Hi there, I'm sorry if I a send it for second time, I've just subscribed for the list. I am trying to interface c++ code in R and make a package. With R CMD SHLIB the dll was created, but when I try R CMD check, I am getting 'undefined reference to..' linkage error messages. The relevant c++ source from conf-infomap.cpp: #include "conf-infomap.h" #include

Hi there, I am trying to interface c++ code in R and make a package. With R CMD SHLIB the dll was created, but when I try R CMD check, I am getting 'undefined reference to..' linkage error messages. The relevant c++ source from conf-infomap.cpp: #include "conf-infomap.h" #include "R.h" // R functions #include "Rinternals.h" #include "Rmath.h" //

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > Patrick, > > On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >> files to all the pieces I want to merge.  These are blackscholes, >> canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions.  I >>

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > >> Patrick, >> >> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> >>> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >>> files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, >>> canneal,

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Patrick, >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> It is open-source and

From here: http://parsec.cs.princeton.edu It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them. May I please commit my

It's not *that* big. The patch is 634K uncompressed. I'd say it would be annoying to have that attached to an email message, but it's no bigger than existing MultiSource tests. --Patrick On 07/21/2010 08:13 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell<criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>

Patrick, On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: > It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT > files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, > canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I > will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test > thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before

I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite infrastructure? The patch is available at [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? Best regards, --Patrick

Has anyone ever used pool allocation on PARSEC? If not, has anyone ever compiled PARSEC to whole-program LLVM bytecode executables? If you have done either of these things, would you please email me your .bldconf files? Thanks, --Patrick

Would someone please merge this for me? --Patrick On 08/05/10 13:43, Patrick Alexander Simmons wrote: > I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite > infrastructure? The patch is available at > [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no > objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? > > Best regards, > --Patrick

There was some talk a year ago about a patch that merges PARSEC into the test suite. Here is a link to the thread: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-August/033877.html Has this just fallen through the cracks? Any help on this subject is welcome. Thanks! -- Wonsun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Chad, Looking back at the old email thread, I believe John Criswell had volunteered to review Patrick's patch (though Patrick is no longer working on this). John, can you take a quick look to see what might be needed to add that patch? Wonsun Ahn just asked about it so perhaps he'd be willing to make any fixes that are needed, if they are simple. --Vikram Professor, Computer Science

Refer to this: https://legacyos.org/vsi-introduces-new-samba-release/ I noticed that VSI, the new owners of VMS, have created a package for Samba4 under OpenVMS. I also notice the samba-vms list appears to be abandoned (for years). So, I apologize for posting here on the general list, but it seemed fruitless trying the dedicated list. I am under the impression that the GPL v3 compels all

Hello, I'm testing the performance of Samba share when a windows client copy a directory that contains many small files (8-18KB). From the windows client during the transfer the speed goes up and down to 0KB/sec, so it's not stable. I have run the same test on a Windows server share (on the same hardware as the Samba share) and the transfer speed is stable, about 404KB/sec which is

Hello, I'm trying to add some tests from PARSEC to MultiSource, and I can't figure out how to disable the lli and cbe backends. Because the code uses inline assembly, only the llc backend works. Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, --Patrick -- If I'm not here, I've gone out to find myself. If I get back before I return, please keep me here.

On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Andrea Cucciarre' via samba wrote: > I have run the same test on a Windows server share (on the same hardware as > the Samba share) and the transfer speed is stable, about 404KB/sec which is > three time quicker then the overage speed in the Samba share. Are you doing it on the same hardware, same drive, same everything? Even if you are, keep in mind that one

I've recently played with the GCC implementation of pointer checker on a real hardware, my recent impressions are here: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerIntelMemoryProtectionExtensions (there is also some old pre-hardware content). In short, I totally agree with what David says above: MPX is a disaster. (Usual disclaimer: my opinion here is too biased) I am glad