similar to: [LLVMdev] Problem with llc and ppc64

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Is there something wrong with my cross-compiler or is the llc-generated code bad? Most likely the latter, the powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu target is not officially supported by LLVM. In fact there is no support for the 64-bit PowerPC Linux ABI in the PPC backend at all. The generated assembly is

Hi, Tilmann Scheller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andreas > Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> Is there something wrong with my cross-compiler or is the llc-generated code bad? > Most likely the latter, the powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu target is not > officially supported by LLVM. In fact there is no support for the > 64-bit PowerPC

Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this > case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? Hmm, that one has its left wing cut off, that wreaks havoc on the symmetry. The 136x136 version at http://llvm.org/Logo.html seems perfect for websites, though. It only lacks the text. What font did you use? Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) Okay, here comes the next one. I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of the next patches so that you can work on them as you have time. Greetings, Andi - --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Albert Graef wrote: > Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this >> case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? > > Hmm, that one has its left wing cut off, that wreaks havoc on the symmetry. > > The 136x136 version at http://llvm.org/Logo.html seems perfect for

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:40:45AM +0200, Sebastian Redl wrote: > I think it would be best to use Mozilla's way for this. If we have any > skilled vector artists, they could try to recreate the image as a vector > graphic (it is not so complex as to prevent this) which would allow for > free scaling. Actually even if you had an SVG source it would be best to simplify the drawing

Felipe Lessa wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:40:45AM +0200, Sebastian Redl wrote: >> I think it would be best to use Mozilla's way for this. If we have any >> skilled vector artists, they could try to recreate the image as a vector >> graphic (it is not so complex as to prevent this) which would allow for >> free scaling. > > Actually even if you had an

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Andreas Neustifter wrote: > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > > > I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, since I'm planing on a whole bunch of changes in the area of the Profiling Infrastructure I would like to ask humbly if it is possible to have approve-after-commit permission for the following files: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfoLoader.h include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfoTypes.h

Sorry, forgot attachment. On 23.07.09 07:40), Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Good Morning. > > On 22.07.09 14:47), Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >>> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >>> with the rest of this patch is that it

Hi! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Sorry for the lag time... No problem. As long as I know that you get to it sometime its fine for me... > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas > Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> Hi Daniel! >> >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of > the next patches so that you can work on them

Hi Daniel! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached > patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have > with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regression in > llvm-prof's behavior. I tried running edge profiling on the > MultiSource/Applications/aha benchmark in the llvm test-suite, and >

Andreas Neustifter wrote: > I'm not an artist, so the simplifying is not so easy for me, but its > true that that is the really hard part. So I did two full-scale sketches > with different texts. Looks nice, even at 256 pixels. Just for the fun of it I sticked it on http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/ (scaled to 128 pixels, though, to make it fit). -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of

On 2009-07-31 11:17, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Hi, > > Albert Graef wrote: > > Andreas Neustifter wrote: > >> Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this > >> case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? > > Hmm, that one has its left wing cut off, that wreaks havoc on the > symmetry. > > > The 136x136 version at

Good Morning. On 22.07.09 14:47), Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >> with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regression in >> llvm-prof's behavior. I tried running edge profiling on the >>

Hi Andreas, Sorry for the lag time... On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Hi Daniel! > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >> with the rest of this patch is that it causes a

Albert Graef wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> I'm happy to announce that Apple has agreed to let llvm.org (and >> anyone else) use the great LLVM logo they designed for WWDC. If >> you're interested, you can see the full version of the logo on this >> page: >> http://llvm.org/Logo.html > > Looks cool! > > I'm awful at this kind of

Hi! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Applied as r78477. > > I do have a few comments on the patch, below, but I'll wait to see > where things are going before acting on them. :) > > -- > >> Index: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h >> =================================================================== > >> + // MissingValue - The value that is returned

Hi, I have a problem with the following scenario: I use the ProfileEstimatorPass to get ProfileInfo and verifiy this info with the ProfileVerifierPass. (Please bear with me, its not about the profiling but about the Pass interaction.) Then the LowerSetJumpPass is executed and I want to verify that the esimtated ProfileInfo survives this pass by calling again the ProfileVerifierPass. This is what