similar to: [LLVMdev] Structure alignment

%FIRSTSTRU = type { i32, double, i32, i8* } struct { int var1; double var2; int var3; char *var4; }firstStru ; Could someone help? If, running a application in windows with MSVC, I allocate a memmory buffer and call a LLVM function with such buffer, there's a structure alignment problem. If the LLVM function call a C function using the same buffer, it runs fine. Any ideas?

struct xfirstStru { int var1; double var2; int var3; char *var4; }; %FIRSTSTRU_PLUSPLUS_TOTVS. = type { i32, double, i32, i8* } Hi, I had not applied the layout at run time, only during the emission of the .bc. Now it's running ok when I allocate the structure point at LLVM side, but, when I allocate the structure pointer in the C

Hi, I have a problem using structs, when calling a function written in C from a LLVM function or calling a LLVM function from a C one. I noticed that the LLVM align double with 4 bytes and our run time routines use 8, in MS Windows. If a use #pragma pack(4) in my C programs, the routines run fine, but I must ensure that all external call should use the #pragma directive. If I change the llvm

The following C code : #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int TESTE2( int parami , int paraml ,double paramd ) { int varx=0,vary; int nI =0; //varx= parami; if( parami > 0 ) { varx = parami; vary = varx + 1; } else { varx = vary + 1; vary = paraml; } varx = varx + parami + paraml; for( nI = 1 ; nI <= paraml; nI++) { varx =

1. Re: LLVM optmization (Bill Wendling) Hi, The IR is not wrong. I said that the assembler generated by MSVC is quicker. We can see that the for loop, in the TESTE function, is done without jump's in the MSVC and with jumps in LLVM. I think thats the point. If we don't use threads, the result is the same. My test were done with one billion interactions in the for loop. The MSVC

Hi, I'm trying to use exception control by LLVM. In the demo page, I got : declare i8* @llvm.eh.exception() nounwind But, when a try to emit the code by llvm engine, the name is generate with the sufix .132 ( llvm.eh.exception.132 ) and the Function::getIntrinsicID abort the program. It was so : Intrinsic::getDeclaration(llvm_module,Intrinsic::memset,&Tys,1); Now, it's

I tried to compile LLVM + stdcxx and I got a lot of compiling errors. Did anyone got that? Manoel Teixeira

The following C test program was compiled using LLVM with -O3 option and MSVC with /O2. The MSVC one is about 600 times faster than the one compiled with the LLVM. We can see that the for loop in MSVC assembler is solved in the optimization pass more efficiently than that in LLVM. Is there an way to get a optimization result in LLVM like that of the MSVC? Manoel Teixeira #include

Dear All,   Here's my problem. I have two lists:   > v [[1]] [1] "five" [[2]] [1] "four" [[3]] [1] "three" [[4]] [1] "two" [[5]] [1] "one" [[6]] [1] "six" [[7]] [1] "five"  "four"  "three" "two"   "one"   "six"  [[8]] [1] "four"  "three"

Is there some preprocess directive to compile LLVM using stdcxx in Windows + MSVC 2005? Manoel Teixeira

Hi, When I try to use va_start(ptr), I got the following problem : Type *Tys = PointerType::get(IntegerType::get(8), 0); return Intrinsic::getDeclaration(llvm_module,Intrinsic::vastart,&Tys,1); ............... The Name generated is "llvm.va_start.p0i8", so, it's not found, abending the process. and Len = 18 In intrinsics.gen : if (Len == 13 && !memcmp(Name,

Hi, When I try to use va_start(ptr), I got the following problem : Type *Tys = Type::VoidTy; Or Type *Tys = PointerType::get(IntegerType::get(8), 0); return Intrinsic::getDeclaration(llvm_module,Intrinsic::vastart,&Tys,1); ............... The Name generated is "llvm.va_start.p0i8", so, it's not found, abending the process. and Len = 18 In intrinsics.gen : if (Len == 13

I'm trying to use exception control by LLVM. In the demo page, I got : declare i8* @llvm.eh.exception() nounwind But, when a try to emit the code by llvm engine, the name is generate with the sufix .132 ( llvm.eh.exception.132 ) and the Function::getIntrinsicID abort the program. Could some one help me? Manoel Teixeira

Hi Sometimes mutt freezes saying "Closing connection to imap.impa.br...". Any clue? Thanks Manoel === My configuration: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) # dovecot -n # 2.0.8: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5xen x86_64 CentOS release 5.5 (Final) default_client_limit = 1027 default_process_limit = 512 first_valid_gid = 1000 first_valid_uid = 1001 log_path

I have this model: class Post < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_ferret :fields => { :title => {:boost => 2}, :description => {}, :url => {}, :rank_sort => {:index => :untokenized_omit_norms, :term_vector => :no},

Gents, I successfully installed AAF on my TextDrive OpenSolaris Container, but I''m having some issues with indexing. I have a model called Blogs which has AAF enabled. The first time I tried to find_by_contents for a ''word'' I know was on the Database I got now results. Apparently the index was not ready yet. Then I waited a few hours and checked that the /index

Hi, I'am trying to use heartbeat to start dovecot... It starts but all the login connections are reject with this line on log file: Jul 7 12:47:28 markov dovecot: imap-login: socketpair() failed: Too many open files No username/password are asked (using Thunderbird as client). Outside heartbeat, dovecot runs fine. My environment: # dovecot --version 1.1.1 # uname -a Linux markov.impa.br

There is serious memory leak bug in ferret. I''m having this error on TextDrive Container (aka. Joyent Accelerators) OpenSolaris with Ferret 0.11.4 It happens while searching for some terms with accented or special characters. This makes ferret to allocate lots of memory (usually reaching 3+ GB) and failing if another query like this is executed. Any ideas on that, could this be locale

i wanna compare functions to be simple , let's say i want x^2 and x^5 in same plot ( it's not the case but if i get it i'll understand for others ) how i do it? x<-seq(-10, 10, l=100) > plot(x^2) and? tks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Gents, I installed ferret successfully in my MacOS (rails development) using the gem install. I did some tests and everything worked fine. Then I tried to install it on the same way on my production environment at TextDrive? running OpenSolaris? (container). This time ''gem install ferret'' seems to be completed: [92140-AA:~/web/labs/blogblogs/trunk] root# gem install ferret