similar to: [LLVMdev] Int1 to Double Type Conversion

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Nyx<mcheva at cs.mcgill.ca> wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to know if there is an instruction to convert values from the > Int1 type to the Double type in LLVM. I would like to achieve the equivalent > of casting a bool value to a double value in C++. Doing the simple > CreateSIToFP or CreateUIToFP does not work, it throws an assertion

Hi all, I'm playing with intrinsics and I was wondering how to lower an intrinsic that should return, for example, an int1? More precisely, how to return the value when working with MachineInst? First, I have defined an instrinsic in "Intrinsics.td": _def int_antivm : Intrinsic<[llvm_i1_ty], [], [], "llvm.antivm">;_ Then I want to lower it in the X86 backend,

Hi guys! I have to compute something and i don't know what i'm doing wrong. my code is a bit complex, but imagine that is something like this: a = c(1,2,3,4) ia = length(a) x = seq(1,100,length=0.1) ib = length(x) int1 = numeric(ib) b = numeric(ib) for(j in 1:ia) { H = function(x) {sin(x + a[j])} for(i in 1:ib) { int = integrate(H, lower = 0, upper

Hi guys! I have to compute something and i don't know what i'm doing wrong. my code is a bit complex, but imagine that is something like this: a = c(1 2 3 4) ia = length(a) x = seq(1,100,length=0.1) ib = length(x) for(j in 1:ia) { H = function(x) {sen(x) + a[j]} for(i in 1:ib) { int = function(x) { integrate(H, lower = 0, upper = x[i])} int1[i] = int(1) } end

Please start a new thread for a new topic and use a meaningful subject for sake of the archives and everyone trying to follow. Using your Int1, correcting your Int2 and using your Y (which goes to Jul not Aug as per the comment): library(zoo) > as.ts(with(merge.zoo(Int1, Int2, Y, fill = 0), pmax(Int1, Int2))) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1992

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:46 PM, sarath chandra <sarathcse19 at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi James, > > First i converted the void * to int* and then did FPToSI...then did SHL...( > because CreateShl only accepts integers... i pointer casted it to int64 type > first)... Below is the code snippet.... > > > lhs = mBuilder.CreateStructGEP(firstArg, 0); > lhs =

Hi, I'm pursuing M.Tech course. As a part of the project work i'm using LLVM as back-end. My project area is "Enhancing the performance of V8 javascript engine using LLVM as a back-end". Now i'm writing code for shift left(SHL) operator. I had my own Value Structure .. it's like this Struct Value { void *val ; char type; } The "char type" holds

Hi Sarath, It would have really helped if you had removed the commented out code and inlined the calls to your homemade helper functions before sending it... You are doing this, in LLVM IR: %0 = getelementptr %Value* %firstArg, i32 0 ; i8** %1 = load i8** %0 ; i8* %2 = bitcast i8* %1 to i64* %3 = getelementptr %Value* %secondArg, i32 0 ; i8** %4 = load i8** %3; i8* %5 = bitcast i8* %4 to i64*

Hi, I want to compute the bitwise 'and' between two values of type int1:  %x = and %a, %b  . Which is the LLVM instruction that creates this? I only found the APInt class, whose constructor is:  APInt(unsigned numBits, uint64_t val, bool isSigned = false) and which provides the bitwise AND operation: APInt  llvm::APIntOps::And (const APInt &LHS, const APInt &RHS)   Bitwise

Yeah, that's the fault...got the answer...... Thanks James for the help... Struggling with this for so many days....... On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:02 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Sarath,**** > > ** ** > > It would have really helped if you had removed the commented out code and > inlined the calls to your homemade helper functions before

Hi all, there appears to be something strange with the plotting of tables of 1 dimension; if I attempt to make a plot of a table of characters with only 1 value I get an error (Error in xy.coords(x, y, xlabel, ylabel, log) : 'x' and 'y' lengths differ). With more than one value I don't get errors, neither with integers (even if only 1 value): tbl.char1 <-

Hi all, there appears to be something strange with the plotting of tables of 1 dimension; if I attempt to make a plot of a table of characters with only 1 value I get an error (Error in xy.coords(x, y, xlabel, ylabel, log) : 'x' and 'y' lengths differ). With more than one value I don't get errors, neither with integers (even if only 1 value): tbl.char1 <-

Hi all, We noticed a lot of unnecessary ptrtoint instructions that stand in way of some of our optimizations; the code pattern looks like this: bb1: %int1 = ptrtoint %struct.s* %ptr1 to i64 bb2: %int2 = ptrtoint %struct.s* %ptr2 to i64 %bb3: %phi.node = phi i64 [ %int1, %bb1 ], [%int2, %bb2 ] %ptr = inttoptr i64 %phi.node to %struct.s* In short, the pattern above arises due to: 1.

I used &Idx[0]. In future, please avoid tabs in your patch. I applied your patch. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20071217/056403.html - Devang On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:57 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: > Devang Patel wrote: >> On Dec 15, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Richard Pennington wrote: >>> I got the current version of LLVM via svn yesterday and

http://lisas.de/~patrick/temp/rtp-optimierung.png Everything is working fine in my Setup, but I want Extern1 to talk to Extern2 directly whitout going over Asterisk as the uplink is slow. When I set for Extern1/2 canreinvite=yes it works, but "Intern-2-Extern" doesn't work because Asteisk gives out the private IP-Adresses of Int1/2 I defined localnet=10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 (Private

I have a function that manipulates a list of numeric and character components of equal length and wants to return a data.frame. EG, f<-function() { a<-list(Int1=1:5,Char1=letters[1:5],Char2=letters[6:10]) b<-data.frame(a) } How can I get the columns Char1, Char2, (...CharN) returned coerced to character and not factor? It appears that I could coerce individual columns by

Devang Patel wrote: > On Dec 15, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Richard Pennington wrote: > >> I got the current version of LLVM via svn yesterday and modified my >> code to >> use the LLVMFoldingBuilder. Very nice! >> >> My question is this: I noticed that the folding builder doesn't fold >> some >> operations, e.g. casts. Is there some reason why? If

Dear List: A few weeks ago I posted some questions regarding data simulation and received some very helpful comments, thank you. I have modified my code accordingly and have made some progress. However, I now am facing a new challenge along similar lines. I am attempting to simulate 250 datasets and then run the data through a linear model. I use rm() and gc() as I move along to clean up the

My general feeling is this: No optimizations should be creating int2ptr/ptr2int. We really need to fix them all. They should use pointer casts and i8* GEPs. This has, unfortunately, been a problem for a long time. As Johannes says, optimizing int2ptr/ptr2int is very tricky. In part, becaue all dependencies, including implicit control dependencies, end up being part of the resulting aliasing

> I think pseudo-instructions should also define isPseudo = 1 Ah yes, thank you. > I expect that before your custom inserter, the value produced by your pseudo instruction was in a vreg. You just have to reuse this vreg to put the result of your "stuff". > If you run llc with --print-before-all, you should be able to see the actual sequence. That's exactly my problem.