Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] RFA: Alignment of Strings"
2009 Jan 09
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Store alignment should be LValue alignment, not source alignment
Hi Evan,
> LValue LV = EmitLV(lhs);
> bool isVolatile = TREE_THIS_VOLATILE(lhs);
> unsigned Alignment = expr_align(exp) / 8
>
> It's using the alignment of the expression, rather than the memory
> object of LValue.
can't you just use expr_align(lhs) instead?
> The patch saves the alignment of the memory object in LValue returned
> by EmitLV().
2009 Jan 09
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Store alignment should be LValue alignment, not source alignment
Hi all,
Please review this patch. It's fixing PR3232 comment #8. Function bar
from 2008-03-24-BitFiled-And-Alloca.c compiles to:
%struct.Key = type { { i32, i32 } }
...
define i32 @bar(i64 %key_token2) nounwind {
entry:
%key_token2_addr = alloca i64 ; <i64*> [#uses=2]
%retval = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2]
%iospec =
2007 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: llvm-convert.cpp Patch
Hi all,
The patch below is to fix a problem with unaligned memcpys. This program:
void Bork() {
int Qux[33] = {0};
}
will currently produce this LLVM code on PPC64:
@C.0.937 = internal constant [33 x i8] zeroinitializer
define void @Bork() {
entry:
%Qux = alloca [33 x i8]
%Qux1 = bitcast [33 x i8]* %Qux to i8*
call void @llvm.memcpy.i64( i8* %Qux1, i8* getelementptr ([33
x i8]*
2007 Feb 25
2
RFA and nsRFA
Dear Sir
There are two packages of regional frequency analysis RFA and nsRFA. Are
both give us same results if not then what you will suggest.
I am confused about this.
Please guid me in this regard
AMINA
--
AMINA SHAHZADI
Department of Statistics
GC University Lahore, Pakistan.
Email:
amnakhan493@gmail.com
amna_989@hotmail.com
amna_989@yahoo.com
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Feb 25
2
RFA
Dear Sir in the following example,is the vector lmom a l-moment ratios
vector? What is meant by size = northCascades[,1]? And what are the values
in c(0.0104,0.0399,0.0405)?
Please help me I am unable to understand these from help manual.
Best Regards
AMINA
data(northCascades)
lmom <- c(1, 0.1103, 0.0279, 0.1366)
kappaParam <- kappalmom(lmom)
heterogeneity(500, 19, size =
2009 Jun 21
0
[PATCHv6 04/12] qemu/pci: check constant registers on load
Add "cmask" table of constant register masks: if a bit is not writeable
and is set in cmask table, this bit is checked on load. An attempt to
load an image that would change such a register causes load to fail.
Use this table to make sure that load does not modify registers that
guest can not change (directly or indirectly).
Note: we can't just assume that read-only registers never
2009 Jun 21
0
[PATCHv6 04/12] qemu/pci: check constant registers on load
Add "cmask" table of constant register masks: if a bit is not writeable
and is set in cmask table, this bit is checked on load. An attempt to
load an image that would change such a register causes load to fail.
Use this table to make sure that load does not modify registers that
guest can not change (directly or indirectly).
Note: we can't just assume that read-only registers never
2007 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: Problem with Exceptions
Duncan,
> Hi Bill, is this a 64 bit machine? If so, did you make
> any adjustments based on
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-August/010489.html ?
This is 32 bit machine. 64 bit will definitely won't work due to bunch
of stuff unimplemented: dwarf builtins, stack layout description, etc.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics &
2007 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: Problem with Exceptions
Hi Bill, is this a 64 bit machine? If so, did you make
any adjustments based on
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-August/010489.html ?
Thanks,
Duncan.
2007 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: Problem with Exceptions
Hi Bill,
> I'm compiling this trivial program on Darwin:
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> try {
> throw argc;
> } catch(int i) {
> return i;
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> However, it segfaults when I run it. I've attached the .s files
> generated by LLVM and GCC, but it looks as if LLVM isn't generating a
>
2007 Sep 03
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: Problem with Exceptions
Duncan,
> I see a call to terminate in the llvm assembler. Where did that
> come from? I compiled with llvm-gcc-4.0 and llvm-gcc-4.2 and
> didn't see such a call.
std::terminate() is called by __cxa_throw, if unwinding fails. I think
the source of problem was my frame_to_args_offs patch. So, let's wait
for retest :)
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of
2008 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] RFA: tree-nested.c
I'm getting a crash with some Objective-C code that involves "blocks".
Basically, it gets to this "walk_all_functions" call and fails:
lower_nested_functions (tree fndecl, bool skip_outermost_fndecl)
{
...
#ifdef ENABLE_LLVM
walk_all_functions (construct_reverse_callgraph, root);
propagate_chains (root);
#endif
...
}
The construct_reverse_callgraph calls
2008 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: tree-nested.c
> What are the assumptions going into this "walk_all_functions" call?
> Should the code have been placed into some nesting info slot or
> something?
Hi Bill, should I think about this or is it fixed already?
D.
2009 Jan 04
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: TREE_READONLY in LLVM-GCC
On Jan 4, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Hi LLVM-GCC hackers!
>
> I have a global variable that I want to mark as "TREE_READONLY" so
> that it will become a "constant" in LLVM IR. This is for the new
> blocks-related stuff, but that's not necessarily important for this
> question. In particular, I want to mark the "block_holder"
2009 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] RFA: TREE_READONLY in LLVM-GCC
Hi Chris,
> I think this change is fine and should go into the normal apple GCC as
> well. Setting TREE_READONLY means that it can go into the "constant"
> section of the executable, go in ROM, etc. This is the same as the
> llvm constant bit on globals.
for this I think it has to be static as well as readonly.
Ciao,
Duncan.
2009 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: TREE_READONLY in LLVM-GCC
I did mark it as TREE_CONSTANT. Is that enough?
-bw
On Jan 5, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>> I think this change is fine and should go into the normal apple GCC
>> as
>> well. Setting TREE_READONLY means that it can go into the "constant"
>> section of the executable, go in ROM, etc. This is the same
2009 Jan 05
1
[LLVMdev] RFA: TREE_READONLY in LLVM-GCC
On Monday 05 January 2009 12:42:16 Bill Wendling wrote:
> I did mark it as TREE_CONSTANT. Is that enough?
No idea - if it works I guess it was enough :) I was
actually thinking of TREE_STATIC:
/* In a VAR_DECL, nonzero means allocate static storage.
In a FUNCTION_DECL, nonzero if function has been defined.
In a CONSTRUCTOR, nonzero means allocate static storage.
??? This is also
2009 May 08
3
[LLVMdev] RFA: flag_objc_abi on Non-Darwin Platforms?
Is the flag_objc_abi variable available on non-Darwin platforms in
llvm-gcc? I want to use it in llvm-backend.cpp to conditionalize a
test. But I don't want to break Linux, Ada, Fortran, etc.
-bw
2009 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] RFA: flag_objc_abi on Non-Darwin Platforms?
On May 8, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Is the flag_objc_abi variable available on non-Darwin platforms in
> llvm-gcc? I want to use it in llvm-backend.cpp to conditionalize a
> test. But I don't want to break Linux, Ada, Fortran, etc.
If not, you can define it in objc-stubs.c
-Chris
2009 Jan 21
2
[LLVMdev] RFA: Constant String c"\000"
The Constants.cpp file returns a ConstantAggregateZero object when you
pass it a c"\000" string. Here is the code:
Constant *ConstantArray::get(const ArrayType *Ty,
const std::vector<Constant*> &V) {
// If this is an all-zero array, return a ConstantAggregateZero
object
if (!V.empty()) {
Constant *C = V[0];
if (!C->isNullValue())