similar to: [LLVMdev] Rebuild DDG

Hi, I believe that my question isn't clear. So, please let me rephrase : I am running a basic block pass (and iterating through each instruction). Is it possible to convert the basic block instruction form llvm IR to x86 IRWITHIN the path ? I mean: is LLVM API exists for this purpose ? Again, thanks. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM, me22 <me22.ca at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun,

I will start with that i am vary grateful for your time.And continue with, i am sorry if my Qs aren't quite accurate( i just started with the LLVM compiler). On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > > I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM

Thank you you answer. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > > Its not x86 IR nor x86 assembly. I have x86 IR "like" instructions ( add > > R1, R2, R3 and so...) > >> > >> If it's really > >> x86

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > Its not x86 IR nor  x86 assembly. I have x86 IR "like" instructions ( add > R1, R2, R3    and so...) >> >>  If it's really >> x86 assembly, you can use LLVM's code generator to get x86 assembly, > > Do you mean the "llvm-gcc -S file.c" , or can i have the

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 15:17, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > I am running a basic block pass (and iterating through each instruction). > Is it possible to convert the basic block instruction form llvm IR to x86 IR > WITHIN the path ? > It seems to me that phi nodes would mean that you can't convert any unit smaller than a function to native code. ~ Scott

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM compiler. Knowing what the optimization does would be very helpful here. > The optimization ALREADY written for x86 IR (i mean that the code that > handles the optimization is designated to work on assembly 86) . It's designed to work on x86 assembly, or

Hi, I am running a basic block pass (and iterating through each instruction). Is it possible to convert the basic block instruction form llvm IR to x86 IRWITHIN the path ? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090510/9c636a9a/attachment.html>

Hi, I am a student (software engineering), and i am using the LLVM in my project (I am sorry of the lack of details, but i want to take the minimum of your time, if you want more details don't hesitate...). I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM compiler. The optimization ALREADY written for x86 IR (i mean that the code that handles the optimization is designated to work on assembly 86)

I believe Dan has added a pass to compute livein / liveout values. Evan Sent from my iPhone On May 30, 2009, at 5:03 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you. > > Is it possible to determine the liveout of the operands (see example > bellow) ? > > %5 = add i32 %4, %3 > > For '%5': i can simply use "

The pass you're referring to is in include/llvm/Analysis/LiveValues.h and lib/Analysis/LiveValues.cpp. It computes conservative approximations for specific liveness queries, rather than full livein/liveout information. It's intended to be used as a heuristic. Dan On May 30, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > I believe Dan has added a pass to compute livein / liveout values. >

Thank you. Is it possible to determine the liveout of the operands (see example bellow) ? %5 = add i32 %4, %3 For '%5': i can simply use " i->isUsedOutsideOfBlock() " For '%3' and '%4' : this is the question ... >From your answer, is it possible to determine *which* value is liveout ( in binary instruction)? On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:57 AM,

Hi, How can i know, if a value have uses outside of the current basic block (liveout), without iterating through all the basic block ? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090530/71681bc2/attachment.html>

Hi, I am new in the "Linux business" and i need to add an optimization to the LLVM compiler. I would like to know what is the bast way to debug (IDE) the LLVM compiler ? To be more precise, what is the equivalent to Microsoft visual studio on Linux platform? is it eclipse? I want features like: syntax highlight, go to def, etc. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi all, Apparently some people had trouble joining today. I also had trouble using the attendee ID provided by webex. I've canceled the meeting series and will be scheduling a new one with an updated link. Please remember to update your calendars with the new invite. My apologies to those who couldn't join today, and to everyone for the churn. Today's Meeting Minutes:

Hi, Thank you for your answer. But let me get it straight, when i compile code with the llvm compiler, and my basic block pass is being processed, other passes are concurrently being processed ? Thanks. On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:01 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Rotem Varon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there an API for getting (within a basic block

We just upgraded Cent from 5.3 to 5.5 on a bunch of servers with little to no issues (kudos to you guys) except on a few servers where it appears we are having a problem w/ the Tomcat upgrade. Previously our application server was working fine under 5.3 with Tomcat/Java installed as such: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp.115 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5

Hi, I am writing a new transformation (Basic block pass). In the "\llvm-2.5\lib\VMCore\AsmWriter.cpp " file there are some of function i want to use. What do i need to add to the transformation code, so i will be able to use those functions? I tried to use a function and got this error : 'AssemblyWriter' was not declared in this scope. Thanks. -------------- next part

----- Mensagem Original -----=20 Eu boicotaria estas empresas s=F3 pelo fato de financiarem os enjoativos e = rancentos Cassetas, mas me surpreendi ao descobrir que tantos produtos que = eu costumo comprar s=E3o transg=EAnicos. Fui conferir no site do greenpeace= e =E9 verdade!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boicote neles! ----- Original Message -----=20 C A M P A N H A=20 N A T A L S E M B A I X A R I A

Conditionally rebuilding the transfer iso saved relatively little execution time, and was a trickling source of bugs. This change simply removes the shortcut code, which means that the transfer iso will always be rebuild. Resolves RHBZ#618965 --- lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Config.pm | 45 +-------------------------------------------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git

Due to some XML issues, we installed *1.6 from Sun jdk-6u20-nb-6_8-linux-ml.sh on Centos. * ** *below is the output from *[root at www2 tmp]# alternatives --config java There are 3 programs which provide 'java'. Selection Command ----------------------------------------------- 1 /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.4.2-gcj/bin/java * 2