similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-java

Hello, LLVM-Java has been rendered obsolete by http://vmkit.llvm.org/ so look into using VMKit instead. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Andre Tavares <andrelct at dcc.ufmg.br> > To: LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:09:42 AM > Subject: [LLVMdev] llvm-java > > Hello, > > I'm working on a project to remove unnecessary array

Dear Nicolas, I'm curious why you are using ABCD in vmkit. Do you need any features from static array bounds checking? As far as I know, SAFECode has a number of implementation for that. Thanks. Haohui On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 20:48 +0200, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Dear Andre, > > That's great! Thanks for the blog. I am really looking forward into > using ABCD in vmkit!

Dear Community, I'm working on a project for Google Summer of Code, to implement the ABCD and Bitwidth analysis in LLVM. I'm not going to extend the description of the project here, this link shows my proposal http://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~andrelct/projects/gsoc_2009/proposal. I have been in some discussions on this list about Ada and SSI that helped on my decisions up to this

Mai, Haohui wrote: > Dear Nicolas, > > I'm curious why you are using ABCD in vmkit. Do you need any features > from static array bounds checking? As far as I know, SAFECode has a > number of implementation for that. > > Thanks. > > Haohui > > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 20:48 +0200, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > >> Dear Andre, >> >> That's

Andre Tavares wrote: > Can someone tell me how to use ACATS? I have searched for documentation, > but found none. The ACATS is here: http://www.ada-auth.org/acats.html including various documentation. It stands for "Ada Conformity Assessment Test Suite". - Bob

Dear Andre, That's great! Thanks for the blog. I am really looking forward into using ABCD in vmkit! Cheers, Nicolas Andre Tavares wrote: > Dear Community, > > I'm working on a project for Google Summer of Code, to implement the > ABCD and Bitwidth analysis in LLVM. I'm not going to extend the > description of the project here, this link shows my proposal >

Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Andre, > > >> I'm trying to build LLVM-gcc to compile Ada. >> > > excellent! > > But I'm having a few problems. > > Oops :( > > >> Now when I ran make I get an error that for me it seams very weird. >> >> ../../gcc/c-format.c: In function 'set_Wformat': >> ../../gcc/c-format.c:48: error:

I'm developing the ABCD algorithm for LLVM, and I will need to store some information as a digraph. I was thinking of a list of adjacency, implemented with a map<Instruction, Set<Node>>. The node would have an Instruction and a value. I opted for map and set, because I will create the graph once and will search on it a bunch of times, and will never remove a node. Is there

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > >> I should have asked a better question. By "does it work" I meant something >> like >> >> for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) >> System.out.println(a[i]); >> >> > > OK, so no :) VMKit does not know that a[i] is related to a.length. I > believe Andre's

Hi Eric, > I'm having problems building llvm-gcc for Ada, which may or may not be > similar to the trouble Andre was having recently. I'm trying to build > it on Fedora 10 (32-bit), using the instructions on the web site. The > make terminates with a gnatbind error: > > gcc -c -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada > -I../../llvm-gcc-4.2/gcc/ada

By static array bounds checking, I mean eliminating array bounds checking which can be proved ``safe'' at compile-time. Well, even though there are a lot of approaches of doing this, I believe that having an implementation of ABCD would very useful. It would be even more useful if LLVM can have a general framework for doing static array bounds checking -- just like the aliasing framework.

Hi Andre, > In file included from ../../gcc/llvm-backend.cpp:23: > ../../gcc/llvm-internal.h:31: fatal error: vector: No such file or directory > compilation terminated. line 31 of llvm-internal.h is: #include <vector> so if that's failing then your C++ compiler is somehow borked. How did you arrange to use the right gcc for the build? Maybe that's getting in the way of

I'm having problems building llvm-gcc for Ada, which may or may not be similar to the trouble Andre was having recently. I'm trying to build it on Fedora 10 (32-bit), using the instructions on the web site. The make terminates with a gnatbind error: gcc -c -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I../../llvm-gcc-4.2/gcc/ada ../../llvm-gcc-4.2/gcc/ada/gnat1drv.adb -o ada/gnat1drv.o

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Andre Tavares<andrelct at dcc.ufmg.br> wrote: > I was thinking of a list of adjacency, implemented with a > map<Instruction, Set<Node>>. The node would have an Instruction and a > value. I opted for map and set, because I will create the graph once and > will search on it a bunch of times, and will never remove a node. Something like

Dear LLVM Community, I'm a Computer Science master student at UFMG, Brasil. I'm interested in taking part on Google Summer of Codes 2009. My idea is not on the LLVM list, but I have written a project description to make my intentions clear. My project is attached as a pdf file. Regards, -- Andre Tavares Master Student in Computer Science - UFMG - Brasil http://dcc.ufmg.br/~andrelct

Hello, I have written a LLVM pass for strongly typed languages. My pass implements the ABCD algorithm. I'm not going to get into what is ABCD, since it has been discussed here. I would like to test it, and on my proposal Duncan Sands told me to use Ada ACATS. Can someone tell me how to use ACATS? I have searched for documentation, but found none. Thanks, -- Andre Tavares Master

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: >> Right, so that part should be trivial. So, does the array bounds check >> elimination already work? If it does, that will considerably reduce >> the work that Andre needs to do. To say the least... >> >> > > Trivial bounds check elimination already work, such as tab[2] = 1; > tab[1] = 2 (the second

Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Eric, > > >> I'm having problems building llvm-gcc for Ada, which may or may not be >> similar to the trouble Andre was having recently. I'm trying to build >> it on Fedora 10 (32-bit), using the instructions on the web site. The >> make terminates with a gnatbind error: >> >> gcc -c -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata

Why not use SmallPtrSet instead of std::vector? Isn't there something in LLVM I can use? Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Andre Tavares<andrelct at dcc.ufmg.br> wrote: > >> I was thinking of a list of adjacency, implemented with a >> map<Instruction, Set<Node>>. The node would have an Instruction and a >> value. I opted for

Andrew Haley wrote: > > I should have asked a better question. By "does it work" I meant something > like > > for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) > System.out.println(a[i]); > OK, so no :) VMKit does not know that a[i] is related to a.length. I believe Andre's optimizations will take care of that. Nicolas