similar to: [LLVMdev] IDE for llvm

Hello, Eclipse is pretty good. If you want something with a smaller memory footprint there's always Code::Blocks for C++. It isn't as advanced as Eclipse though. I don't know if anybody has done the configuration files for LLVM-GCC on those IDEs yet but it should definitely be possible to modify from the standard GCC profiles. If you find something better, let us know. --Sam

Hi, I am running a basic block pass (and iterating through each instruction). Is it possible to convert the basic block instruction form llvm IR to x86 IRWITHIN the path ? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090510/9c636a9a/attachment.html>

Thank you. Is it possible to determine the liveout of the operands (see example bellow) ? %5 = add i32 %4, %3 For '%5': i can simply use " i->isUsedOutsideOfBlock() " For '%3' and '%4' : this is the question ... >From your answer, is it possible to determine *which* value is liveout ( in binary instruction)? On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:57 AM,

Thank you you answer. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > > Its not x86 IR nor x86 assembly. I have x86 IR "like" instructions ( add > > R1, R2, R3 and so...) > >> > >> If it's really > >> x86

I believe Dan has added a pass to compute livein / liveout values. Evan Sent from my iPhone On May 30, 2009, at 5:03 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you. > > Is it possible to determine the liveout of the operands (see example > bellow) ? > > %5 = add i32 %4, %3 > > For '%5': i can simply use "

I will start with that i am vary grateful for your time.And continue with, i am sorry if my Qs aren't quite accurate( i just started with the LLVM compiler). On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > > I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM

The pass you're referring to is in include/llvm/Analysis/LiveValues.h and lib/Analysis/LiveValues.cpp. It computes conservative approximations for specific liveness queries, rather than full livein/liveout information. It's intended to be used as a heuristic. Dan On May 30, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > I believe Dan has added a pass to compute livein / liveout values. >

Hi, How can i know, if a value have uses outside of the current basic block (liveout), without iterating through all the basic block ? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090530/71681bc2/attachment.html>

Hi, I am a student (software engineering), and i am using the LLVM in my project (I am sorry of the lack of details, but i want to take the minimum of your time, if you want more details don't hesitate...). I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM compiler. The optimization ALREADY written for x86 IR (i mean that the code that handles the optimization is designated to work on assembly 86)

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 15:17, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > I am running a basic block pass (and iterating through each instruction). > Is it possible to convert the basic block instruction form llvm IR to x86 IR > WITHIN the path ? > It seems to me that phi nodes would mean that you can't convert any unit smaller than a function to native code. ~ Scott

Hi, I believe that my question isn't clear. So, please let me rephrase : I am running a basic block pass (and iterating through each instruction). Is it possible to convert the basic block instruction form llvm IR to x86 IRWITHIN the path ? I mean: is LLVM API exists for this purpose ? Again, thanks. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM, me22 <me22.ca at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun,

I have been going through all the Wikis and various Google searches to try to solve my problem, all to no avail. I can mount a Samba share, but whenever I try to login using a domain account, I receive an error about "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed." What I have done so far, all to no avail. - Upgraded from Samba 3.4.2 to Samba 3.4.4

Get the latest code and look at mdf.c. This module is the echo canceller. Tom bast@sirrix.com wrote: > > Hello MailingList! > > I'm searching a Echo Cancellation to implement it in my own project. I > found > in a newsgroup a posting that you've programmed an open-source > EC-Algorithm. > > My Question: > Is it possible to get the source code of the

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM compiler. Knowing what the optimization does would be very helpful here. > The optimization ALREADY written for x86 IR (i mean that the code that > handles the optimization is designated to work on assembly 86) . It's designed to work on x86 assembly, or

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > Its not x86 IR nor  x86 assembly. I have x86 IR "like" instructions ( add > R1, R2, R3    and so...) >> >>  If it's really >> x86 assembly, you can use LLVM's code generator to get x86 assembly, > > Do you mean the "llvm-gcc -S file.c" , or can i have the

I am having problems with putting users into LDAP I am getting a message about 'parent does not exist'. Does anyone know what this means?? --- Debug Level 10 output of 'smbpasswd -a -m jeff-w$' --- [root@bast samba]# bin/smbpasswd -a -m jeff-w$ -D 10 Netbios name list:- my_netbios_names[0]="BAST" Trying to load: ldapsam:ldap://bast.picotech.net/ Attempting to register

Hi, I am writing a new transformation (Basic block pass). In the "\llvm-2.5\lib\VMCore\AsmWriter.cpp " file there are some of function i want to use. What do i need to add to the transformation code, so i will be able to use those functions? I tried to use a function and got this error : 'AssemblyWriter' was not declared in this scope. Thanks. -------------- next part

Hi, I am trying to set loop unrolling as a required pass. AU.addRequired<LoopUnroll>(); should I include any header file? How can I be possessive that "LoopUnroll" is the name I need ? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090606/aaab7bd1/attachment.html>

Hi there ! I came across the NetBeans IDE and also the screencasts. Here are the links for screencasts: http://blogs.sun.com/roumen/entry/two_demos_jruby_on_rails D/L Link : http://nbi.netbeans.org/m11/download.html I''m now on Kdevelop and not yet tried NetBeans and its ~80 Mb of D/L. If any of you had tried it out, do post your views. -- Arjun.

Bast, the way I understand it is that Let's Encrypt is not a Root Certificate Authority, it's an intermediate. The root CA of Let's Encrypt is " DST_Root_CA_X3.crt", you should find it in /etc/ssl/certs/. I have sucessfully installed a Let's Encrypt certificate on a debian machine by Octobre 2016th too and it worked just fine. -- Yassine.