similar to: [LLVMdev] MachineJumpTableInfo.h Warning

The warning is: R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk\include\llvm/ADT/SparseBitVector.h(58) : warning C4099: 'llvm::ilist_sentinel_traits<llvm::SparseBitVectorElement<ElementSize>>' : type name first seen using 'struct' now seen using 'class' R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk\include\llvm/ADT/SparseBitVector.h(275) : see reference to class template instantiation

Hi, I'm new to Clang / LLVM, and trying to build so that it will run natively on Windows. Used the CMake approach (thanks to whoever created the configs for this). Had to comment out "DbgInfoRemover.cpp" in one of the make files (didn't spend time to figure out why), following which CMake produced a nice working Visual Studio 2008 solution file. I opened this up in VS

Does not seem to be a straight error with LLVM itself, but rather the tools, linking issues, here are the errors: Opt: 30> Creating library R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk_VC8_building\lib\Debug\opt.lib and object R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk_VC8_building\lib\Debug\opt.exp 30>LLVMScalarOpts.lib(IndVarSimplify.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public: bool __thiscall

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Dan, can you add IVUsers.cpp to the appropriate cmakefile? > > -chris > > > On May 12, 2009, at 10:54 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote: > >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On May 12, 2009, at 10:24 PM,

In DataTypes.h starting on line 121 are these lines: #define INT8_C(C) C #define UINT8_C(C) C #define INT16_C(C) C #define UINT16_C(C) C #define INT32_C(C) C #define UINT32_C(C) C ## U #define INT64_C(C) ((int64_t) C ## LL) #define UINT64_C(C) ((uint64_t) C ## ULL) They are conflicting with the cstdint when we have updated headers in our MSVC build. I could have sworn I talked about this

Did someone make a change in MachineFunction and forget to update something? g++ -I/Volumes/data/Wendling/llvm-submission/build/obj/obj-llvm/lib/CodeGen -I/Volumes/data/Wendling/llvm-submission/build/obj/src/llvm/lib/CodeGen -I/Volumes/data/Wendling/llvm-submission/build/obj/obj-llvm/include -I/Volumes/data/Wendling/llvm-submission/build/obj/src/llvm/include

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:58 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:57 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> / * snip */ >> >> Actually, rebuilding it makes "debug tblgen" fail with the errors at >> the

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:57 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >> / * snip */ > > Actually, rebuilding it makes "debug tblgen" fail with the errors at > the end of this email, and as such everything that depends on it, how > odd... > When I get back to that

I am now getting the following link errors on all executables: x86.lib(X86AsmPrinter.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: virtual bool __thiscall llvm::x86::X86ATTAsmPrinter::runOnMachineFunction(class llvm::MachineFunction &)" (?runOnMachineFunction at X86ATTAsmPrinter@x86 at llvm@@UAE_NAAVMachineFunction at 3@@Z) x86.lib(X86AsmPrinter.obj) : error LNK2001:

Hi, Two questions. 1) How are you computing size of the method being jitted? 2) Why not simply add the functionality of allocating emission buffer of specific size to MachineCodeEmitter instead? Thanks, Evan On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi everyone, > > vmkit requires to know the size of a jitted method before emitting > the method. This allows to

OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > If you are curious, the remaining non-pedantic warnings are: > > An actual warning that should be fixed: > 4>r:\sdks\llvm\trunk\utils\tablegen\CodeGenDAGPatterns.h(27) : warning > C4099: 'llvm::Init' : type name first seen using 'class' now seen > using 'struct' [snipped some more

Hi Evan, Evan Cheng wrote: > 1) How are you computing size of the method being > jitted? I add a new pass with addSimpleCodeEmitter, with the emitter being a SizeEmitter. Since the target calls the emitter with functions such as writeByte, writeWord, etc.... the SizeEmitter class implements these function by incrementing a counter. At the end of the pass, the code size of the

On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:50 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi Evan, > > Evan Cheng wrote: >> 1) How are you computing size of the method being >> jitted? > > I add a new pass with addSimpleCodeEmitter, with the emitter being a > SizeEmitter. Since the target calls the emitter with functions such as > writeByte, writeWord, etc.... the SizeEmitter class implements these

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > / * snip */ Actually, rebuilding it makes "debug tblgen" fail with the errors at the end of this email, and as such everything that depends on it, how odd... When I get back to that computer then I will clean its directory, update from SVN (please fix the const thing soon :) ), and rebuild fresh...

Evan Cheng wrote: > On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:50 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > > > That's a hack. :-) It is if you think that code emitter should only be used for actually writing somewhere the data. It is not if you find it another useful utility ;-) > Some targets already have ways to compute the exact > size of a function. See ARM::GetFunctionSize()

Evan Cheng wrote: > > Let's see. ARM has it already. PPC has getNumBytesForInstruction so > you only need to add one to compute function size. Also you only need > to implement it for targets that support JIT right now, which leaves > Alpha and X86. I'm guessing Alpha is using fixed encoding so it should > be pretty easy. Or you can just punt it and let the target

On Apr 4, 2008, at 11:16 PM, Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr> wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: >> >> Let's see. ARM has it already. PPC has getNumBytesForInstruction so >> you only need to add one to compute function size. Also you only need >> to implement it for targets that support JIT right now, which leaves >> Alpha and X86. I'm

Hi Evan, Evan Cheng wrote: > > I don't think the duplication is going to be top much of a problem. If > it is, I'll bug you about refactoring. :) > > I don't mean to show how lazy I can be, but I also need to know the size of the exception table emitted in memory (JITDwarfEmitter.cpp). Reviewing it a little, I can not see how things won't be duplicated.

On Apr 4, 2008, at 5:50 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:50 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: >> >> >> That's a hack. :-) > > It is if you think that code emitter should only be used for actually > writing somewhere the data. It is not if you find it another useful > utility ;-) Except it's pretty slow at it. :-)

In the llvm file include/llvm/Support/DataTypes.h (.in/.cmake), for MSVCit defines some macros that are defined in the cstdint.hpp file in boost (and boost does it better, detailed below): The basic error is: R:\SDKs\boost\built_head\include\boost-1_38\boost/cstdint.hpp(347) : warning C4005: 'INT8_C' : macro redefinition