similar to: [LLVMdev] problem with analysis required

Kshitiz Garg wrote: > Hello, > I was trying to get the loop info in a module pass to be able to > iterate over the loops int the module itself. Since my pass requires > to make module level changes including adding new types to module > hence a looppass cannot be used here. > I am getting the following error on running opt. > > opt:

Hi, I'm trying to use the function getAnalysis. This is the code I'm using : void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); AU.setPreservesAll(); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(); } I get following error when I try to run my pass : opt:

nitisha warkari wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use the function getAnalysis. This is the code I'm using : > > void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); > AU.setPreservesAll(); > } > > virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { > LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(); > >

Hi, I had a question about this as well. The documentation about writing a pass shows an example like what John wrote, calling a function pass within a module pass on a per function basis. However, if I code it that way, I still get the same error: opt: /x/jeffhao/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:232: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*,

Hello, I have created a ModulePass, that now needs LoopInfo information. The ModulePass registration is taken from [1]. I use clang to directly invoke it (This is also a hard requirement, because I need the fancy output of clang warnings/remarks). The problem is, that the dependency to the LoopInfoWrapperPass does not seem to work. The error is: --- snip --- clang-4.0:

Hi, I wrote tiny ModulePass which iterates over functions and then uses getAnalysis<LoopInfo> in order to get informations about the loop. It compiles smoothly, but whenever I try to run it I got error like this: opt: .. PassAnalysisSupport.h:203: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::LoopInfo]: Assertion `ResultPass &&

Sure. I've attached the code for the test pass I wrote, as well as the code and bitcode for the testcase I'm running. All the functionality has been stripped out of the pass, and the pass compiles without a problem, but the error appears when the pass is run. Jeff On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:06:44 -0800, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff

Hi Tim, > From: Tim Creech <tcreech at umd.edu> > Subject: [LLVMdev] IVUsers (LoopPass) analysis in a ModulePass? > Date: September 1, 2011 11:46:28 AM PDT > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > Hi all, > I have a loadable ModulePass which does transformations, and I would like to > use IVUsers analysis within it. I noticed when I try to do this (via > the usual

On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff Yeong-Peng Hao wrote: > > Hi, > > I had a question about this as well. The documentation about > writing a > pass shows an example like what John wrote, calling a function pass > within > a module pass on a per function basis. However, if I code it that > way, I > still get the same error: > > opt:

Hi, you need something like this in your pass: void YourPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); } because you need to specify which analysis you are using. Tobi

Hi, Migrating from 3.5 to 3.9. There is a module pass that uses alias analysis started breaking at runtime: llvm/lnx64/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:236: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(llvm::AnalysisID) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::AAResultsWrapperPass; llvm::AnalysisID = const void*]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was

But this is already present in my pass. And I am not able to understand the cause for the error: opt: /home/ambika/llvm_3/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:203: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::DominatorTree]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not "

On 08/12/2010 09:41 PM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > Dear guys, > > I am having problems to obtain good information from the LoopInfo. > I am always getting a trip count of 0, even though I am clearly passing > a loop with a constant bound. I am using this pass below: Hi, I would propose to first check if the trip count is calculated correctly. I would do this with opt

Hi, I found an existing pass "CalledValuePropagation" that can solve the problem I raised a few days ago regarding the "callees" metadata ( https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/yjtZVMH_aC4). Now I have difficulty in calling this pass in my own pass. In my own pass, I called "getAnalysis<CalledValuePropagationPass>()" and in the

Thanks John, I modify my code to like this: bool XXX::ModulePass(Module &M){ .... LoopInfo &li = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(fi); .... } Here fi is a Function* pointing to main(). Now when I run the pass, another error shows up: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = llvm::LoopInfo]: Assertion `ResultPass

ambika wrote: > But this is already present in my pass. > And I am not able to understand the cause for the error: > Can you send a copy of your getAnalysisUsage() method for your pass? There are some funny errors that can occur when you do things that the PassManager cannot handle. For example, if you're requiring a transform pass, that can cause strange assertions from the

I have a transformation where I'd like to use both DominatorTree (for ExtractCodeRegion), and DemoteRegisterToMemory (i.e., reg2mem). The transformation is phased, so all occurrences of getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(Function) happen before any occurrence of getAnalysisID<FunctionPass>(&DemoteRegisterToMemoryID, Function). If I register these two passes with DominatorTree first, I

Hey all, We have been working on a pass that uses another pass to count loads and stores prior to performing its own instrumentation. The second pass adds the first as required via the usual getAnalysisUsage function. On one machine, it has been tested and proven to function correctly. On another machine, whenever the second pass is run, it consistently fails the assertion: opt:

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Tobias Grosser <grosser at fim.uni-passau.de>wrote: > On 08/12/2010 09:41 PM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > >> Dear guys, >> >> I am having problems to obtain good information from the LoopInfo. >> I am always getting a trip count of 0, even though I am clearly passing >> a loop with a constant bound. I am using

Dear All, The attached code (which is a contrived test case) hits the following assertion: test: /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:226: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = Pass1]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not "