similar to: [LLVMdev] New Wiki 'section': projects

Daniel, Can we add the relevant plugins for pretty printing of source code? On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > >Done > > Yay, we got Wiki, now I can do some wicked UML diagrams for LLVM, he, he, > he > :) > > Many thanks, > > Aaron > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at

As soon as i get out of this meeting I will On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: > Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: >> John Criswell wrote: >>> someguy wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>>

>Done Yay, we got Wiki, now I can do some wicked UML diagrams for LLVM, he, he, he :) Many thanks, Aaron On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > As soon as i get out of this meeting I will > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: >> Daniel, can you set up the virtual

I'll see which plugins others use. Which wiki's pretty printing are you thinking of in particular? 2009/3/23 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com>: > Daniel, > Can we add the relevant plugins for pretty printing of source code? > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Aaron Gray > <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >Done >>

Done On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > As soon as i get out of this meeting I will > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: >> Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu>

John Criswell wrote: > someguy wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've started outlining the notes I'd like to see on the wiki on the >> front page (http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page). >> >> I'll hopefully add a bunch of those as I go along, but feel free to >> both correct my mistakes and fill in the blanks. >> >>

Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please? On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > John Criswell wrote: >> someguy wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've started outlining the notes I'd like to see on the wiki on the >>> front page (http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page).

someguy wrote: > Oh. One more thing: > > Paulo, while your working out how to do what Chris said (making usage > of bigints into library calls), wouldn't it just warm your heart to > document the process on the wiki? > > </wiki pimping> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:16 AM, someguy > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oh. I

Hi all, I'm pretty new to LLVM and am slowly learning the code-base and architecture, mostly as a result of my efforts to implement a target backend. There are a number of resources (read: documents) available which deal with some parts of backend development (and LLVM development in general), but sadly they are not at all comprehensive. I'd like to propose that a wiki be made available

I agree too. I'm working on an analysis pass and I could be adding info to a wiki as I discover how to do things. Anthony On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:22 AM, someguy wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm pretty new to LLVM and am slowly learning the code-base and > architecture, mostly as a result of my efforts to implement a target > backend. > > There are a number of resources

Reid Spencer had set one up at one point, but it never got much traction. It seems to be broken at the moment: http://wiki.llvm.org/ On 2009-03-11, at 02:22, someguy wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm pretty new to LLVM and am slowly learning the code-base and > architecture, mostly as a result of my efforts to implement a target > backend. > > There are a number of resources

someguy wrote: > Hi All, > > I've started outlining the notes I'd like to see on the wiki on the > front page (http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page). > > I'll hopefully add a bunch of those as I go along, but feel free to > both correct my mistakes and fill in the blanks. > > Could someone in a 'position of power' please cname

The reason for my suggestion is that adding intrinsics is also considered to be a breaking change. This is the third question/suggestion in the last week or so where the intrinsics/pseudo-function idea has been raised. Perhaps what llvm really needs is a 'generic' pseudo-intrinsic of some kind? 2009/3/30 Milos Puzovic <milos.puzovic at gmail.com> > 2009/3/30 someguy

In principle, having a Wiki like this would be valuable. In practice, I think there will need to be some sanity checking to make sure incorrect or misleading information is not added to it. The old Wiki below isn't up any more. We can set one up on llvm.org. --Vikram Associate Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve On Mar 11,

On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:20 PM, someguy wrote: > I could be wrong, but I think that you may need to add a 'big-integer' > intrinsic type to llvm. No, please don't. GMP is just another library like libc, your front- end should just generate calls into it like any other library. This is similar to how we handle threading and many other "language features". -Chris

Hi All, I've started outlining the notes I'd like to see on the wiki on the front page (http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page). I'll hopefully add a bunch of those as I go along, but feel free to both correct my mistakes and fill in the blanks. Could someone in a 'position of power' please cname wiki.llvm.org to the google2.osuosl.org server so Daniel can

Thank you. I just downloaded the binaries... Maybe I should compile it in my PC. I'll have a try. Thanks. $ file llvm-gcc llvm-gcc: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, not stripped 2009/3/16 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com>: > How did you compile LLVM? > > Can you please 'file

2009/3/30 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com<just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com> > > Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert > function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead? > It would make LLVM code generation more difficult because instead of building a new instruction (in this case intrinsic) you will be building

Oh. I see. That way the bigints don't need a representation in llvm IR... neat. Sorry for the misdirecton! On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:20 PM, someguy wrote: > >> I could be wrong, but I think that you may need to add a 'big-integer' >> intrinsic type to llvm. > > No, please

On Mar 11, 2009, at 8:43 AM, someguy wrote: > If we get the blessing of one of the old-timers who is willing to > spend a little time reviewing postings, we can deal with the > 'misleading information' issue. I don't consider the possibility of "misleading" information to be a big worry. It is no worse than having out of date "official" docs. Ideally,