similar to: [LLVMdev] job opportunity

Hi - I've scoured the mailing list archives as well as other help sources online and haven't figured out what my problem is or what I'm doing wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Scenario: I have a samba 3.5.5 server running on CentOS 5.5. This system is a member of an Active Directory domain. FYI, I am not the domain administrator, but I am an OU admin and can create

On Apr 13, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Anthony Danalis <adanalis at eecs.utk.edu > > wrote: >> How can I use MemoryDependenceAnalysis (or any other analysis for >> that >> matter) to gather that the instructions >> j = N/2 (store i32 %11, i32* %j, align 4) >> and >> N = N+7 (store i32 %12, i32* %n,

Dear All I inserted a frequently used function (subroutine) right into my Rprofile.site which allows me to run it each time-works great. However, this approach is obviously suitable for a short function or a small number of functions. Instead of inserting the lines in Rprofile.site, is there a way to insert one line pointing to (fetching) the function in a local drive, similar to #include

Hello, I have set up an anonymous rsync server that seems to work as expected. However when I try to access the server from several other unix boxes using rsync with a command like this; rsync netlib3.cs.utk.edu::netlib I get the motd and then a line that states client: nothing to do Now I would expect this to give me a directory listing. I do get the directory listing as expected when

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Anthony Danalis <adanalis at eecs.utk.edu> wrote: > How can I use MemoryDependenceAnalysis (or any other analysis for that > matter) to gather that the instructions > j = N/2  (store i32 %11, i32* %j, align 4) > and > N = N+7  (store i32 %12, i32* %n, align 4) > are the ones that define the parameters "j" and "N"

is there a way to do element-by-element multiplication as in Gauss and MATLAB, as shown below? Thanks. --- a 1.0000000 2.0000000 3.0000000 x 1.0000000 2.0000000 3.0000000 2.0000000 4.0000000 6.0000000 3.0000000 6.0000000 9.0000000 a.*x 1.0000000 2.0000000 3.0000000 4.0000000

Dear All, I am a novice user of the R software package. When I try and compute, exp(-1000) or exp(-2000), i get the answer as zero. Is there any way i can get R to compute the answer and give me an actual number ? ( by increasing the precision or any other method). If I cannot get R to give me a number, can anybody give me some advice on how to manually compute this number ? I would greatly

I agree. Being a newbie myself, I can relate to what problems someone new to llvm would have.While I think most of the stuff I have tried will be useful, I wouldn't be entirely sure if its the best way to go about it. Thanks Nipun Arora Columbia University On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Anthony Danalis <adanalis at eecs.utk.edu>wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Jon

Hello, I have a code similar to the following: program test integer i, j, N real B(10) call bar(N, 8) N = N+1 do i = 1, N B(i) = (i+5)/(i+3) enddo j = N/2 N = N+7 call IMPORTANT_F(B, N, i, j) end program and I am trying to use dependence

On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 14:19:28 Vikram S. Adve wrote: >> In principle, having a Wiki like this would be valuable. In >> practice, >> I think there will need to be some sanity checking to make sure >> incorrect or misleading information is not added to it. > > Yes, I think a Wiki would be extremely valuable.

[mailed jointly to maintainers@octave.org, r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch to reach users with relevant experience. watch where your replies go. what would make using LAPACK and ScaLAPACK easier for Octave and R developers? -- ejr, not subscribed] We plan to update the LAPACK and ScaLAPACK libraries and would like to have feedback from users on what functionalities they think are missing and would

Hi Anthony, 2009/3/30 Anthony Danalis <adanalis at eecs.utk.edu> > Is the user expected to add the calls to spawn/join or the compiler? If > it's the compiler adding them, then you don't need to change the front-end > at all, you can do all that in an optimization pass. If it's the user > adding them, then adding calls to "__spawn()" that the compiler

Hello, I am currently using R to run an external program and then read the results the external program sends to the stdout which are tsv data. When R reads the results in it converts it to to a list of strings which I then have to maniuplate with a whole slew of commands (which, figuring out how to do was a reall challenge for a newbie like myself)--see below. Here's the code I'm

Hi - I'm having some problems with network browsing using a Samba PDC (3.0.22) and I'd appreciate any hints that might push me in the right direction. One of the problems is that I am on a very crowded subnet that is being used by several different groups. There are a two separate WinNT/2000-style domains active on this network as well as an AD domain controller. Here are the

Hi All, I'm perplexed by the way the unclass function displays a factor whose labels have been swapped with the relevel function. I realize it won't affect any results and that the relevel did nothing useful in this particular case. I'm just doing it to learn ways to manipulate factors. The display of unclass leaves me feeling that the relevel had failed. I've checked three books

I feel like a complete dolt, as I know this question has been asked by others on a fairly regular basis, but I'm going in circles trying to get the following to work: id.prob<-function (tt) { library(mvtnorm) #============================ Makeham<-function(tt) { a2=0.030386513 a3=0.006688287 b3=0.039047537 t<-tt-20 h.t<-a2+a3*exp(b3*t) S.t<-exp(-a2*t+a3/b3*(1-exp(b3*t)))

I agree too. I'm working on an analysis pass and I could be adding info to a wiki as I discover how to do things. Anthony On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:22 AM, someguy wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm pretty new to LLVM and am slowly learning the code-base and > architecture, mostly as a result of my efforts to implement a target > backend. > > There are a number of resources

Hi I am new to writing C code and am trying to write an R extension in C. I have hit a wall with F77_CALL(dgemm) in that it produces wrong results. The code below is a simplified example that multiplies the matrices Ab and Bm to give Cm. The results below show clearly that Cm is wrong. Am= 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Bm= 1 1 1 1 1

I would like to open a console application from within R and then send input to the newly opened console. I can use the following to open the application ... setwd(path) system(paste(path,"icl.exe",sep="")) This allows me to type in what want, but I would like to do something like this setwd(path) system(paste(path,"icl.exe",sep=""),input=c("icl

I think your idea is very interesting. However, some of the issues that concern you might not be as bad as you think. On Mar 30, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Milos Puzovic wrote: > 2009/3/30 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> > Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? > Insert function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead? > It would