similar to: [LLVMdev] Porting a VM to LLVM

Hi guys, first of all let me say "hello" to everyone. Its the firt message for me in this list and I'm pretty happy that I'll be able to finally start working with LLVM. I've a question for you all if you can help me: a few years ago I've implemented a simple VM for a language we're using in my company. The VM JIT compiles a simple bytecode and executes it.

On Saturday 04 April 2009 09:20:21 Gabriele Farina wrote: > - generate IR from my complier; > - build a VM that converts at runtime my bytecode to IR and executes it; > > I largely prefer the second option because it would be great if I can > continue to use to old programs without having to recompile them. > > Which approach do you suggest ? are there any alternatives ?

Hi Jon, I've read your articles about HLVM, and that was one of the reasons that convinced me to try out LLVM. Actually my VM has been implemented in C++, but as long as it is not extremely complex, I might port it to OCaml that sounds more compact for this kind of programs. Did you find any significant performance loss when using OCaml over C++ ? Runtime performance is quite

Well, you are right :) In fact I've started porting the VM in the spare time and it is working fine. I'm still having some issues to understand the garbage collector, but I'll delve more into it as soon as the other features will be complete Gabriele Il giorno 07/apr/09, alle ore 08:22, someguy ha scritto: > Gabrielle, > > The way I see it, its pretty much the same

Gabrielle, The way I see it, its pretty much the same thing... Conversion to LLVM-IR of a custom bytecode is the same as conversion to LLVM-IR of a custom language. The syntax of the 'custom language' just happens to be binary bytecode. On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Gabriele Farina <gabriele at sephiroth.it>wrote: > Hi, > > Isn't it intended to explain how to build

Hi, Isn't it intended to explain how to build a compiler for a custom language that targets LLVM-IR ? Is it useful also to understand how to build a VM that is meant to execute custom bytecode (converting it to LLVM-IR previously) ? Thanks, Gabriele Il giorno 05/apr/09, alle ore 11:36, Anton Korobeynikov ha scritto: > Hello, Gabriele > >> thanks for the suggestion. Do you

Hi Mike, thanks for the suggestion. Do you know if there are any articles around that explains how to use LLVM to build a VM that should work like mine ? I've read something around (mostly source code) but a good article/doc will be perfect Gabriele Il giorno 04/apr/09, alle ore 19:23, Mike Stump ha scritto: > On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Gabriele Farina wrote: >> Which

On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Gabriele Farina wrote: > Which approach do you suggest ? are there any alternatives ? My take, do the second one first, gain some experience and have some fun. You can use this to double check the performance and suitability. But mid-term, I'd say, do both. This allows you to compare the performance of each solution against the other, compile time,

Hello, Gabriele > thanks for the suggestion. Do you know if there are any articles > around that explains how to use LLVM to build a VM that should work > like mine ? > I've read something around (mostly source code) but a good article/doc > will be perfect Have you read the 'Kaleidoscope' tutorial? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and

"Rajesh M" <24x7server at 24x7server.net> writes: > during peak times here are the results for connections > > [root at ns1 domains]# doveadm who |grep imap |wc -l > username # proto (pids) (ips) > 631 > [root at ns1 domains]# doveadm who |grep pop3 |wc -l > username # proto (pids)

Here's what I'm trying to do. I have a spam filtering operation as a front end for other servers. I've created a virtual server for spam storage where the user will be able to log in using squirrelmail/dovecot to review and release their spam. The email is stored in maildir format. Piecing it together I can use squirrelmail to pipe the email into something so that if a use finds a

Hello There is no reply about this demand since the firt proposition has if nobody in dev team cares about it :( Strange ... Le 14 mars 2018 20:39:53 GMT+01:00, "Johannes L?thberg" <johannes at kyriasis.com> a ?crit : >Quoting Johannes L?thberg (2017-01-06 02:34:43) >> >this change request is already tracked as a bug #2063 [1] (with the >> >related

Gents, My TI C55xx complier is complaining about (in opus_encoder.c, opus_encode()): st->silk_mode.payloadSize_ms = 1000 * frame_size / st->Fs; where .payloadSize_ms is opus_int, frame_size is an int, and Fs is a long. Should one of these be cast differently? Thx, MikeH -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi R users Which version of S does the current R version use? Venables and Ripley's book (2000) says R is version 3 of S language. Is there any change since 2000 ? I searched R-help archive for using C or C++ with R. Although there are some postings, I am looking for up-to-date answers. Which one ( C and C++) works better with R? What complier is the best suited for R ( gcc or visual

Daniel Lopes wrote: > Ping a client you surely know should be connected to the switch. ARP > will take the part to find out the hardware address so the packet can be > delivered. If the switch is on it should find a hardware address and ARP > should put it in your ARP cache. It´s independet from ICMP blocks and > similar. So after trying to ping you should have an entry in your ARP

Hi All, I have already used gcc to creat a library, for example, it is called "test.a", which includes many c objects. How to link my main "a.c" function to this library when I used Rcmd SHLIB to complier my main c program? I tried "Rcmd SHLIB a.c test.a". It does not work this way. Does anyone have idea about this? Thanks, Xiaoping

Jean-Marc Liger <jean-marc.liger at ...> writes: > > Le 15/05/2016 ? 20:42, Le Nucksi a ?crit : > > > On 05/14/2016 07:16 AM, Le Nucksi wrote: > >> Hello list, > >> > >> is there a way to get more recent libvirt builds for CentOS 7 that include > >> support for the xl (modern Xen) toolstack? > > Hy, > > I am maintening the

Hi, I was trying to install package glmnet in R, but failed and it show such messages: * Installing *source* package glmnet ... This package has only been tested with gfortran. So some checks are needed. R_HOME is /home/username/R/R-2.9.0 Attempting to determine R_ARCH... R_ARCH is Attempting to detect how R was configured for Fortran 90.... Unsupported Fortran 90 compiler or Fortran 90

Hi Everyone, I'm trying to load some C++ code using dyn.load but I'm getting unresolved symbols associated with some external libraries (CSparse). I gather this is something to do with linking as the the code compiles fine. However, I've passed -L/home/jarrod/My_Programs/SuiteSparse/CSparse/Lib -lcsparse to the complier (g++), either directly using R CMD SHLIB or as

can you give a detail description about the target architecture? ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "XU Xinfeng"<xu.xinfeng at gatech.edu>; Date: 2009年9月15日(星期二) 上午7:34 To: "llvmdev"<llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>; Subject: [LLVMdev] Dear LLVM, Dear LLVM, Now, I have to design special complier for my own multicore microprocessor with cusomized