similar to: [LLVMdev] Type operator defenition

I've made all the suggested changes - however, I'm having a bit of problem running the tests. I started "make check" and several hours later it had only made it through about 1/3 of the tests. I'm not sure what the deal is. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > > OK

OK here's a new version of the patch - and the unions.ll test actually passes :) On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > > OK here's the patch for real this time :) >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >> Here's a work

On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > OK here's the patch for real this time :) > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a work in progress of the union patch. Note that the test > "union.ll" does not work, so you probably don't want to check this > in as is. However, I'd be interested in any

Dear UseRs, Setting methods for groups ("compare" in this case) does not work properly. Once one method is set ,redefining it or even removing does not change the behavior: setClass("foo" ,representation(range="numeric") ) #[1] "foo" setMethod("Compare",c(e1="ANY",e2="foo"), function(e1,e2){ browser()

Dear all, Since many years the following C++ code does compile on ALL Bioconductor servers (Linux, Windows, Mac) without any warnings: Int_t numsels = 0; //number of selected entries ... for (Int_t i=0; i<size; i++) { numsels = (arrMask[i] == 1) ? ++numsels : numsels; }//for_i Even on the recently added release server 'zin2' Linux (Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS) the

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Cc: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 2:52 PM > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Dale Johannesen

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 4:17 PM > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Kasra > <kasra_n500

--- On Fri, 1/30/09, Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [LLVM][g++] A helping hand > To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc..edu> > Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 8:29 AM > On 2009-01-30 18:19, Kasra wrote: > > Hi All, >

libswfdec/swfdec_as_strings.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_initialize.as | 3 libswfdec/swfdec_initialize.h | 306 ++-- libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c | 4 libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.h | 3 libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie_as.c | 83 + test/trace/Makefile.am | 20

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > From: Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 4:20 PM > On Feb 3, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Kasra wrote: > > I guess the

libswfdec/swfdec_as_string.c | 31 +++--- libswfdec/swfdec_color_as.c | 9 - libswfdec/swfdec_interval.c | 2 test/image/.gitignore | 2 test/trace/Makefile.am | 27 +++++ test/trace/array2-8.swf |binary test/trace/array2-8.swf.trace | 40 ++++++++

libswfdec/swfdec_as_internal.h | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 28 libswfdec/swfdec_as_types.c | 33 libswfdec/swfdec_as_types.h | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie_as.c | 44 test/trace/Makefile.am | 18 test/trace/localToGlobal-propflags-5.swf |binary

configure.ac | 3 swfdec-gtk/swfdec_gtk_loader.c | 6 swfdec-gtk/swfdec_playback_alsa.c | 10 swfdec/.gitignore | 2 swfdec/Makefile.am | 13 swfdec/swfdec.h | 1 swfdec/swfdec_as_string.c |

libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 3 test/trace/Makefile.am | 18 ++++ test/trace/callmethod-this-5.swf |binary test/trace/callmethod-this-5.swf.trace | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ test/trace/callmethod-this-6.swf |binary test/trace/callmethod-this-6.swf.trace | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ test/trace/callmethod-this-7.swf

libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 65 ++------- libswfdec/swfdec_sound.c | 24 --- libswfdec/swfdec_sound.h | 4 test/trace/Makefile.am | 27 +++ test/trace/enumerate-5.swf |binary test/trace/enumerate-5.swf.trace | 6 test/trace/enumerate-6.swf |binary test/trace/enumerate-6.swf.trace | 6

libswfdec/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 10 libswfdec/swfdec_as_date.c | 4 libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.as | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.h | 183 libswfdec/swfdec_as_strings.c | 2

libswfdec/swfdec_as_function.c | 55 +++++ libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.as | 4 libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.h | 288 ++++++++++++++--------------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 57 +++-- libswfdec/swfdec_as_strings.c | 1 test/trace/Makefile.am | 14 - test/trace/function-apply-5.swf

libswfdec/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_boolean.c | 113 +++++++++++ libswfdec/swfdec_as_boolean.h | 55 +++++ libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 4 libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.h | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.c | 11 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.h

libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.c | 88 +- libswfdec/swfdec_xml.c | 17 libswfdec/swfdec_xml_node.c | 23 test/trace/Makefile.am | 28 test/trace/array-no-object-5.swf |binary test/trace/array-no-object-5.swf.trace | 14 test/trace/array-no-object-6.swf |binary test/trace/array-no-object-6.swf.trace | 14

ping... On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > OK here's a new version of the patch - and the unions.ll test actually > passes :) > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: >> >> OK here's the patch for real this