similar to: [LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: proposals!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: proposals!"

2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Hi Manuel, Thanks for the help. Still persists for me too. Instead of waiting indefinitely, now I get this error: Unhandled Exception ("AphrontDeadlockQueryException") #1205: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:26 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > The problem still persist :( > > On 12/11/14, Manuel Klimek
2011 Sep 16
2
[LLVMdev] problem with sgt's on Sparc machine
Hi Christine, > I am using LLVM 2.8 and llvm-gcc 4.2. Could you please try svn top-of-tree? Clang is also a better choice here. > The assembly files are attached. In the assembly file, the erroneous result > is associated with 'subcc', while the correct ones are associated with 'or'. -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc
2009 Feb 28
2
[LLVMdev] Removal of GVStub methods from MachineCodeEmitter, ELFWriter, and MachOWriter
I have done a possible cleanup patch for the MachineCodeEmitter, ELFWriter, and MachOWriter classes. It removes the two startGVStub(), and finishGVStub() JIT specific methods. You may remember the following comments :- /// JIT SPECIFIC FUNCTIONS - DO NOT IMPLEMENT THESE HERE! To get rid of these easily turned out to be a semicomplex modification because of the JITInfo classes dependance on
2011 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] Cross compling with LLVM for MIPS
I have installed LLVM on my machine (ubuntu) a while ago. I think my LLVM version is 2.8. is it supported in 2.8 ? When I install i didn't configure LLVM for mips. Do I have to configure it when I build ? Thanks in advance. Really appreciate it. --- On Thu, 9/1/11, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: From: Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com>
2008 Jul 07
5
[LLVMdev] fp_round libcall
Hi, I'm trying to emit FP_ROUND f64 -> f32 considering a mips target that only supports single float point operations. The problem is that f32 is considered legal on this target but f64 doesn't and the only way I can codegen this instruction is using setConvertAction(MVT::f64, MVT::f32, Expand), which issues a EmitStackConvert. What if I want a libcall instead? What should I do? The
2011 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] Cross compling with LLVM for MIPS
Hello All, I am trying to cross compile for MIPS on x86 architecture. I want to do it using LLVM ? How can I do it ? Thanks in advance. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110901/b4e68ea3/attachment.html>
2008 Jul 21
1
[LLVMdev] small bss and data support for elf asm
Basic support for Small bss and data. The rest is implemented with target specific logic and will be commited as soon as it's ok to commit this patch. -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc "When faced with untenable alternatives, you should consider your imperative." -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smallsections.patch
2010 Nov 17
3
[LLVMdev] Is it possible to run llvm on mips machine?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Michael.Kang <blackfin.kang at gmail.com> wrote: >> I like to get the support of llvm runtime so that I can run some VM >> that depends on llvm. I googled porting keyword >> and also simply try to cross compile llvm. Just like
2009 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] Removal of GVStub methods from MachineCodeEmitter, ELFWriter, and MachOWriter
I'll look at these. First scan looks good. Are you able to run some tests? Evan On Feb 28, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > I have done a possible cleanup patch for the MachineCodeEmitter, > ELFWriter, and MachOWriter classes. It removes the two > startGVStub(), and finishGVStub() JIT specific methods. > > You may remember the following comments :- > >
2011 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] Cross compling with LLVM for MIPS
Using LLVM+CLANG, you can do something like: clang -ccc-host-triple mips-unknown-linux -ccc-clang-archs mips ... On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:15 PM, janarbek <canarbekmatay at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > I am trying to cross compile for MIPS on x86 architecture. I want to do it > using LLVM ? > How can I do it ? Thanks in advance. > > >
2015 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] llvm books
Hi Renato, > This book also sucked a lot from the public documents, which is a shame. We cited the official docs a lot in the book, explicitly saying they are the definitive place to look for updated guidance. Since it's a book for beginners there's likely a lot of intersection with official docs content, but I don't remember I or Rafael sucking directly from them :-) Let us know
2015 Jul 21
3
[LLVMdev] llvm books
On 21 July 2015 at 14:27, Evgeny Astigeevich <evgeny.astigeevich at arm.com> wrote: > The book is exactly what is written in its title: getting started. It give > basics of each major part of LLVM. After reading it you will be able to > build it from scratch. What is most important the book shows in details how > components of LLVM are built into a compiler toolchain: from
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Another php type problem; can you please try again. Thanks! On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 1:37:32 PM Bruno Cardoso Lopes < bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm facing the same problem. > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:16 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am facing problem while submitting patch on phab. All things go smooth > - >
2011 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] Cross compling with LLVM for MIPS
> I have installed LLVM on my machine (ubuntu) a while ago. I think my LLVM version is 2.8. is it supported in 2.8 ? When I install i didn't configure LLVM for mips. Do I have to configure it when I build ? I don't know what's the default llvm configuration for ubuntu! But you can check for mips support using "llc --version". Yes, it's supported in 2.8, although it
2007 Feb 15
4
[LLVMdev] llvm mips backend!
Hello, I'm interested on implementing the MIPS backend as a student in a compiler course on my university, starting in 2 weeks from now!! I've seen on the mailing list history no one has done it so far (although a lot said they would)! am i right? Thanks! -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.org "The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and
2010 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Is it possible to run llvm on mips machine?
I like to get the support of llvm runtime so that I can run some VM that depends on llvm. I googled porting keyword and also simply try to cross compile llvm. Just like to know is it possbile ? Does any modification needed? Thanks MK -- www.skyeye.org
2012 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Calling conventions for YMM registers on AVX
Hi, What is the calling conventions for YMM. According to documents I saw till now, the YMMs are scratch and not saved in callee. This is also the default behavior of the Intel Compiler. In X86InstrControl.td the YMMs are not in "defs" set of call. - Elena --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments
2011 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] problem with sgt's on Sparc machine
I can't reproduce this problem with the recent svn trunk. LLVM 2.9 has lots of fixes for Sparc back-end. So, please at least try with LLVM-2.9. Thanks, On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Christine, > >> I am using LLVM 2.8 and llvm-gcc 4.2. > > Could you please try svn top-of-tree? Clang is also a better
2010 Feb 03
2
[LLVMdev] Does mips backend support variable arguments in release version(llvm-2.6)?
Hi everyone, It seems variable arguments is not support by mips backend in llvm-2.6. int func(int i, ...) { return 0; } llvm-gcc func.c -emit-llvm -c -O3 -o func.bc llc func.bc -relocation-model=static -march=mips -O0 -o func.s Command llc fails: llc:SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp:6440:void llvm::SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments( llvm::BasicBlock):Assertion 'Invals.size() ==
2014 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] Recent compile time performance regressions
Hi Chandler, On an x86 system, for ToT LLVM: With "Remove support for LLVM runtime multithreading": 23.8788 With patch reverted: 22.5229 That's around 6% regression. Detailed JSON file is at http://paste.debian.net/113238, http://paste.debian.net/113239 -Yi On 1 August 2014 21:56, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:47 PM,