similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 2.5 libexec installed without program-prefix

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 2.5 libexec installed without program-prefix"

2009 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 2.5 libexec installed without program-prefix
OK, let me rephrase this. What is the preferred way to install llvm + llvm- gcc onto a fedora system? Here is what I used: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program- prefix=llvm make make install ../llvm-2.5/configure --enable-optimized --prefix=/usr/local make make install
2009 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 2.5 libexec installed without program-prefix
> /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1/ > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 25179621 2009-03-25 09:15 cc1 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27917074 2009-03-25 09:15 cc1plus > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 359307 2009-03-25 09:15 collect2 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2009-03-25 09:15 install-tools > > No llvm-prefix. That's correct and not a llvm-gcc problem. This is how
2009 Mar 25
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 2.5 libexec installed without program-prefix
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote: > OK, let me rephrase this. What is the preferred way to install llvm + > llvm- > gcc onto a fedora system? The preferred way to install LLVM and LLVM-GCC is the same on pretty much any Linux system and described here: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#starting > Here is what I used: >
2008 Nov 12
1
[LLVMdev] hello compiles with -O3 but not -O4
Trivial hello world program compiles with -O3, but with -O4: (BTW, is there a guide to what different -On mean?) llvm-g++ -O4 Hello.cc -o Hello -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.4.source/configure --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/nbecker/llvm-2.4 --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc.
2009 Feb 12
4
[LLVMdev] problems running test suite (-mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns)
I'm trying to run some of the test suite using the instructions here: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#quicktestsuite I've built llvm myself, but I'm using pre-built binaries of llvm-gcc (from http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/llvm-gcc4.2-2.5-x86-linux-RHEL4.tar.gz). Here's what happens: foad at debian:~/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk$ ./configure
2008 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc fails to build libgcc when built with itself
Can you bootstrap llvm-gcc (configure with --enable-bootstrap)? Ciao, Duncan.
2008 Nov 11
3
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc fails to build libgcc when built with itself
Hello, I’m trying the following thing: • build and install llvm with mgcc (system compiler) • build and install llvm-gcc with mgcc • build llvm with llvm-gcc • deinstall llvm(old), install llvm(new) • build llvm-gcc with llvm-gcc(old) • deinstall llvm-gcc(old), install llvm-gcc(new) However, I have the problem that the llvm-gcc(new) does not work: after it is compiled, it tries to build libgcc2
2009 Feb 12
0
[LLVMdev] problems running test suite (-mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns)
Hi, > I'm trying to run some of the test suite using the instructions here: > > http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#quicktestsuite > > I've built llvm myself, but I'm using pre-built binaries of llvm-gcc > (from http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/llvm-gcc4.2-2.5-x86-linux-RHEL4.tar.gz). > > Here's what happens: the llvm testsuite (from svn, right?) uses
1999 Jun 15
7
quotas: documentation? Properties?
System: samba 2.0.4b on Solaris 2.x Starting point: PC's "Properties" window on a share of home directories; diskspace Used/Free "pie-chart" and figures. A colleague asked me yesterday whether this properties window could display the diskspace information, using the user's UNIX quota rather than the physical space on the disk. Our environment has potentially 14,000
2009 Mar 13
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4.2-2.5 front-end build problems on SunOS
Hello all, I am trying to install the llvm-gcc front end to use it in one of my projects, but I got stuck.. I am working on a Sun workstation: SunOS xxx 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240 and I have gcc version 3.4.6: Reading specs from /sw/gcc-3.4.6/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.4.6/specs Configured with: /.scratch/andjo/lsw/src/gcc/gcc-3.4.6/configure
2009 Feb 20
7
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release2 available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release2 is finally available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run
2007 Oct 31
2
R GUI for Linux
I have downloaded and tried to install JGR - Java GUI for R - Version 1.5. I followed all the instructions (at least in my best resolution) and installed Java latest version. R installation complete fine. Has anyone succeded in installing JGR on SuSE 10.3 ? In the following I hade detailed the failed installation, As root /i did the following: linux-Mimin:/usr/local/bin # ./R R version 2.6.0
2008 Apr 14
14
[Bug 15502] New: Unknown LVDS configuration bits
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15502 Summary: Unknown LVDS configuration bits Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: low Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: pee at
2009 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] Problem when build llvm-gcc using llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source.tar.gz
Hi, The gcc version in my system is 3.4.6 During make display error message and stop cc1plus:error: unrecognzied command line option -Wno-variadic-macros Must i update gcc to version 4.2.0 or above to resolve the problem? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2009 Mar 02
6
[LLVMdev] Please review the 2.5 release notes
Hi All, Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Let me know if you have any additions, improvements, or see any oversights. If you have commit access, please just directly change the document. The release is planned to go out in about 24 hours from now! Thanks! -Chris
2009 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] Please review the 2.5 release notes
Chris Lattner wrote: > Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Here are two typos I noticed: s/improvmenets/improvements/ s/GFortan/GFortran/ -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag
2011 Jan 18
3
[LLVMdev] About test suits Cont1
*1. I have searched the access/setting of LLVMCC_EMITIR_FLAG in the build directory, recursively, and all the output is what I pasted in last email (just the same to the that in source directory). Maybe the configure failed to do it. My command list for building the test suit is as followings:* *(1) cd ~/SRC_DIR/llvm/projects* *(2) svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk
2009 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] Problem when build llvm-gcc using llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source.tar.gz
On Oct 20, 2009, at 8:29 PM, Heyu Zhu wrote: > Hi, > > The gcc version in my system is 3.4.6 > During make display error message and stop > > cc1plus:error: unrecognzied command line option -Wno-variadic-macros > > Must i update gcc to version 4.2.0 or above to resolve the problem? That is a sign that your native GCC is not new enough, upgrading to 4.2 or later should
2009 Sep 25
6
[LLVMdev] JIT on ARM
Hello. My goal is to use LLVM with JIT compiler for ARM on Android device. Currently I have successfully built and executed LLVM bitcode with interpreter on Android. Speed is not so great, that is why I want to use JIT. I tried building bitcode on windows with llvm-gcc that is provided on llvm home page. Resulting bitcode runs great in interpreter, but it doesn't use JIT. From what I
2009 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] JIT on ARM
Forgot to mention. I don't know how well the canadian cross compile stuff works in 2.5. We made some improvements in that area for 2.6. If you have trouble with it, I'd suggest trying 2.6 (or even better, ToT svn) and seeing if things are improved there. -Jim On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Martins Mozeiko wrote: > Hello. > > My goal is to use LLVM with JIT compiler for ARM